Documents

Oral argument — Stoney Lester v. J. v. Flournoy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2018

And that is the pre-Booker sentence, the period that we are talking about. And the issue in our case is whether Mr. Lester's sentence is fundamentally defective. … So today, the government concedes that under the Armed Career Criminal Act, if you have an improper Armed Career Criminal Act enhancement that takes you from a 10-year maximum sentence to above that, that

Oral argument — Garten Trucking LC v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025

And if that's the case, then aren't my colleague's comments, Judge Qualabong's comments, don't they become especially pertinent in terms of the standard of review that we owe to the agency in the NLRB … The timing of the union's comments and the response, the coerciveness inquiry wouldn't necessarily be altered because this was an individual that was a part and he had authority to comment on past wages

Oral argument — Adebowale Ojo v. Loretta Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015

Griffin sir My problem with the adoption argument that you are making at this point Is that it seems to me from reading the Child Citizenship Act? … it's one rule that they work in tandem to know but did but there's the Korygo rule and the Hwang rule and the Hwang rule is narrower Mean they put in some qualifiers you I mean it pulled him out of the air

Oral argument — Crystal Hultz v. Frank Bisignano

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2025

There are comments, for example, on page 763 of fatigue, problems with her eyes, mouth soreness, muscle spasms. These are in Dr. Nassari's notes. … What, did this come out of the air? Oh, I believe she's malingering. What do we do with that?

Oral argument — United States v. Fathia-Anna Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2017

Your Honor, other courts have accepted that view, which is that later voluntary affirmative acts of the defendant can wash clean the manufacture of jurisdiction. … The Travel Act was designed to reach mafia dons and racketeering cases. And this is the most domestic of domestic cases.

Oral argument — United States v. Francisco Villa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2022

the indictment of the for the illegal reentry offense so there's not really a Sixth Amendment analysis but even if there is even if we go through the Barker factors the district court did not clearly air … it's just the period that seems like inappropriate I guess or the period that wasn't the defendants fault I really what I really was pretty confused about what is delay and what it's not the Constitution

Oral argument — Erin Osmon v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

Well, to stop for the Tort Claims Act doesn't have to be within the scope of employment. … So what is happening during the 15 minute period when they will not give me my thing back and they're calling for the person who with the gun, that's not a seizure.

Oral argument — United States ex rel. Cody v. Mantech International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2018

Cody, there were two other senior executives that had been terminated in that same period of time. … And I look at, you know, the case law, the Air Sea Forwarder's case as an example.

Oral argument — Lori Freeman v. Dal-Tile Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014

Freeman talks about, they're in a compacted period of time. … No, you have evidence that over the entire period he came in, he used racial comments. He says he said stuff that was not appropriate, and he used sexual comments the entire time. There is evidence.

Oral argument — United States v. Mark Landersman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

So even if the – How many of the overt acts did the judge find were proven? She made no finding with respect to each and every overt act. … The inference that was drawn, as she went on the record specifically, she had withdrawn as to one particular comment, which is that he had this meeting with Martinage and he aired what he wanted to do

Oral argument — Isaiah Wilkins v. Pete Hegseth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025

We're saying people living with HIV, if you act rationally, meet all of those criteria. … And, and that the Declaratory Judgment Act, I take her argument to be the Declaratory Judgment Act has a similar basis. And so maybe it's the same thing as 706. I'm not sure.

Oral argument — Madison Cawthorn v. Barbara Lynn Amalfi

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2022

Summers commenting on notice-and-comment rulemaking, right? That's a procedural right, a procedural right to raise a challenge. It's not a substantive right. … So that whole question there is still up in the air. Now, we can make it so that anybody can come in with any kind of problem, and a state can't do it.

Oral argument — United States v. Jairo Aguilera Sagastizado

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2026

Guevara was a rogue member prone to random acts of violence and that mr. Canales did not say to kill Unverified Chiavales those were all made during mr. … So we do not believe that there was sufficient prejudice that would warrant relief under a plain-air review To The extent the court has further questions, I'm happy to answer those.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeremy Naughton

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2015

What if we say you are in plain air review? If you disagree with me on that, Your Honor, we still prevail under plain air. … And officers have to act. And officers have to act. Officers have to act when they're faced with an emergency situation. And, you know, Ms. Skelton said there's a question here of probable cause.

Oral argument — First Financial Insurance Comp v. Tonya Brumbaugh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2013

Doesn't that put some obligation on you to act? No, sir, it doesn't under South Carolina law. … And the 30 days notice would have covered the period in question. If Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Jessie Glass, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2025

Seems to be clean. Judge Bell found no that recklessness requires Lawrence be actually aware that the risk would materialize. And that is not the standard for recklessness. … Because a magistrate would say, my gosh, we've had these different investigations of this over a period of years where there's smoke, there must be fire.

Oral argument — Arthur Drager v. PLIVA USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2013

I think applying plain vanilla waiver rules is a very clean way for this court to fulfill that avoidance candidate, and that before the court wades into the thicket created by the mensing and Bartlett … the district court said, and I left out part of the quotation earlier for the sake of brevity, but again, at JA 705 to 706, after the court said, I didn't resolve this on preemption grounds, there's a comment

Oral argument — Bryan Manning v. Donald Caldwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2019

It's prohibited for the select, very, very select, very long period of time. … And I realize the panel opinion is vacated, but we also rely on the panel process to air the issues and formulate them for the in-bank court.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Ka

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2020

I mean, we I think when you look at it fundamentally, we were dealing with this in a clean slate. … If I may just briefly comment on that. Yes, please. Yes.

Oral argument — John Walters v. Michael Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2021

And respectfully, I think it airs both as a matter of fact and as a matter of law. … Walters for not having any counsel during that period? Thank you very much.