Documents

Oral argument — Dome Patent L.P. v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2015

The threshold issue in this appeal is whether Section 282A of the Patent Act constrains the decision-making authority of patent trial and appeal boards in the same way that it constrains the authority … It's about one-third of the oxygen content in the air underneath your eyelid as it is just in the air itself.

Oral argument — Lair v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

There were discussions that took place between me and the agency attorney and it was just sort of left up in the air. … Do you think that he acted appropriately at all times?

Oral argument — A10 NETWORKS v. BROCADE COMM

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2013

Well, you can track the Taiwan Patent Act. If I found, is the Taiwan Patent Act a public document? It is. … Period. Period. The ministry has a number of things that are all based on conditions. They're all conditions.

Oral argument — VAZQUEZ-CLAUDIO v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2013

Vasquez-Claudio's capacity for adjustment during periods of remission. They said that's not the issue for the Board. … Lawton has to make that argument in order to get jurisdiction, but the fact is that the VA acted in conformity with these regulations and, frankly, for...

Oral argument — WALKER v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2012

The continuity is broken if after service you have a period when something didn't happen and it was as a result of an intervening cause. … If someone suffers hearing loss during the period of service, that's service-connected, correct? Under 3.303A. Yes.

Oral argument — Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2014

It's not just these terms in the air. … Your comment on that? Well, let's first look at what has happened.

Oral argument — Pogosyan v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2017

Oral replies are rarely given within the original response period. They're frequently scheduled after the response period has expired. That's the way I've seen it done for the last 15 years. … I've handled cases for Department of Homeland Security, Department of Treasury, Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense. Procedures are similar across the board that I've encountered.

Oral argument — Love v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

I mean, there might be different types of cancers, have different conditions with different implications, different periods of remission, recurrences. … But if the Secretary exceeds his or her authority, the Secretary is acting contrary to 1155, right? Correct. In excess of, and then thus, you have an unhinged executive, Your Honor.

Oral argument — LMK Technologies, LLC v. BLD Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2017

And so when you couple those together, when you have this long period where people skilled in the art are not aware of, are not appreciating, have not recognized that problem, that is where the lapse of … Just to the elbow. ...to that pipe juncture, which you're referring to as the elbow, to provide a discrete hydrophilic band there, which happens to act as a multi-directional water stop.

Oral argument — In Re Power Integrations, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018

But that did affect how quickly the board acted on it because it was waiting to find out whether BRI was even still in play. But now, with respect. … I mean, that's just the whole problem here, is they're pulling this definition out of thin air. It's not required or mandated by the specification.

Oral argument — Arkansas Carpenters v. Bayer AG

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2008

, the only predicate act. … And the court said, well, if the only predicate act that's an unlawful act under RICO is what happened in the patent office, then we're going to hold it to be preempted. Thank you.

Oral argument — Ross v. OPM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2014

Held herself out as married during the period of time up until the time that she was annulled? I would say yes to that answer. … You're putting an awful lot of limitations out of thin air. I don't see anything in any of the statutes that permit that.

Oral argument — Genentech, Inc. v. Immunex Rhode Island Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

So since the statute only requires them to give you notice of the biological product, why would the 180-day time period restart? … In fact, it facilitates discovery by creating that artificial act of infringement. It gets the parties into court faster.

Oral argument — Shure Incorporated v. ClearOne, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2021

Your Honor, the after arising clean construction is what introduced the configured for, the able to be used, the capable of use, the design to allow. … The court's order regarding the bond amount made very clear that the preliminary injunction acted to enjoin the 24-inch MXA 910.

Oral argument — Communications Test Design v. Contec, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

When you say that, you're not saying that the true intent was not, I'm making air quotes, nefarious. That was a double negative. True, true. … I mean, in the briefing, we do take the position that CTDI acted in bad faith, that it had bad faith intent.

Oral argument — Miller v. DOJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2016

Monitoring prison phone calls or cleaning the tables at the mess hall? The collateral duties that were assigned to Mr. Miller were assigned to him by the warden. And there was a period... … For the agency to act dumb and say the warden's testimony, which is unsubstantiated, even though we have the wherewithal to bring in whomever we wish to support or corroborate the warden's testimony.

Oral argument — Metz v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2006

Well, because to get to a conclusion that the Military Pay Act, the underlying act that provides us with the ability to be before the federal court of claims, we have to be able to show that there is an … Skogerby testified at length in her testimony as to what was available during that period of time. That was part of the evidentiary hearing. Her testimony commences at a I think 195.

Oral argument — XPO Logistics Worldwide v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2018

They said your experience in air TDEF, so what are you going to do about it? Crowley comes in with 34 new references and it comes in with more information. … Let me point out as well that there was no change to the RFP here, so we aren't in a blue and gold situation or a comment situation.

Oral argument — Womack v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2020

It boils down to the opinion in Scharf versus the Department of the Air Force, which basically says that it is not necessary for a judge, for an administrative judge, to find that the appellant is intentionally … And third, the resignation was the result of improper acts by the agency. But isn't there something curious? You can't dig it out from the record.

Oral argument — Ruggieri v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2006

There was a period of time, then, that by a stroke of the pen they could have acted. There may have been, but there's no law that. You say there may have been. … You do agree, do you not, that there was a period of time when the agency could have acted?