Documents

Oral argument — Manasco v. Miller v. Acting Administrator

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Was there a policy in place that required that he be checked or looked after on a periodic basis? … Why wouldn't that be a verbal act? How wouldn't it come into evidence as a verbal act? That's what makes it a verbal act. That's what makes it a verbal act.

Oral argument — San_Diego_County_Employees_Retirement_Association v. Johnson_&_Johndon_et_al

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2025

, so that is all corrective— pardon me, that is all information going into the market that is muting, all right, muting the false statements that J&J likes to say is coming out into the market and is acting … They had been aired previously. And the second one was that the tone of a pessimistic Reuters article somehow was what caused the stock, was what drove the price impact that day.

Oral argument — Zimmerman v. Corbett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

However, there was a comment as an aside that probable cause was established. The focus of the hearing was never probable cause, at least at that juncture. … Zimmerman as opposed to the cleaning person or the colleague grabbing a show off for a meeting who picked up the phone in one of the eight other offices within the office that all likely contained the

Oral argument — Toledo Mck v. Mack Trucks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Isn't the rule that if they establish a conspiracy was in existence before the limitations period, if there are overt acts that continue within the limitations period, they're good? No. Okay. … Mather's point, if you would, she says that all the stuff that goes on in that period, Mr. Byer, has to do with Mac comments, and that's independent action, and it doesn't reflect concern.

Oral argument — Bunge SA v. Adm International Sarl

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2023

English law doesn't let you, for example, under the Federal Arbitration Act, you can initiate an arbitration with an arrest of a ship in rem. … kicked up some references to things you're alleging in the – you're out of time, but since you're now raising some specific claims that you're making in the London arbitration that, you know, were not aired

Oral argument — Heraeus Medical GMBH v. Esschem,Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2018

Webb Diet was a court of common pleas case that made the same mistake the district court made in this case, which was to take the comment to the model uniform trade secret acts applying to the second sentence … Act.

Oral argument — Moreno v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

Prohibited sexual act, Your Honor. All right. So the least culpable conduct is prohibited sexual act. … Judge Schwartz's comment. Let me just ask you on the comment because no court has yet, has held that possession of child pornography is not morally turpitude.

Oral argument — Toll Brosvs Century Surety Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Haas did not come out of thin air. … She says, in her order, fine, you HAS have no rights against Essex, period.

Oral argument — USAv.Green

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010

There's a lot of that in this record, which explains why he's acting the way he does on the day of this aborted buy. … They drive for a period of time. Green is venting. He's profane. He's sane, as the Court talked about, the words about that could be construed as an indirect threat.

Oral argument — InRe JevicHoldingCorpPt.4

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2015

We submit that the answer to that clean legal question is no. Going back to Martin and the... Wait, wait, they apply. They're just not mandated. Fair enough, your honor. … You're going full bore with your Warren Act claims and maybe you'll get a big recovery.

Oral argument — 12-3996, 13-1455 In Re Pendleton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2013

Doesn't that put us in a little bit of an awkward spot, speaking into the air, when what really is going to count is what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court says about the retroactivity of Miller? … They said you can't do this, period. As a matter of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, you cannot mandatorily send a juvenile to prison.

Oral argument — Eaglebank v. Virginia Investment

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2016

Why don't you comment on that last point, Mr. Ciardi? Your Honor, the Fox Hill case, and I refer back to that again, even though it is not controlling. I understand. … Your Honor, this is a completely ultra-virous act. If you look at Section 6.5... What's ultra-virus? It means it's completely outside of the authority of this entity.

Oral argument — Siegel v. Atty Gen N J

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2026

We have also evidence that commentators at the time, legal commentators in treatises that were cited in Heller, lay commentators, or actually I don't know who exactly they were, but people writing in newspapers … They could have said we're going to clean up after ourselves entirely. That's not the question.

Oral argument — Brian Fields,etal. v. Speaker of the PA House of Representatives

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

You know, it appears to me that this case comes to us on pretty much a clean slate. We haven't decided this question definitively. … Can you comment on the D.C. Circuit's decision? That is correct, Your Honor. And I would agree that Barker v. Conroy is a very close parallel to this case. It was decided just two months ago.

Oral argument — Handal v. Innovative Industrial Properties Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2025

In there, the makers of the statements are culpable and they act with scienter under a vial. So the question is, does that bad faith that they exhibit between April 14th and May 5th carry back? … Now, putting aside whether recklessness is the standard, which is, I guess, up in the air. Putting aside. Not challenged it. Back to Blue Orca into what you just said.

Oral argument — United States v. Bergrin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2021

And so we're talking now the 2012-2013 time period, and he refused because he was afraid that we would retaliate against him because he was a cooperator. … If ever there were a case where, partly because of the stakes, there should have been a full evidentiary hearing and all this should have been aired out, this is the one.

Oral argument — 21-2439_Gonzalez v. State of NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2023

That's the period where they are involved with this family. … It's individualized knowledge in whether or not the individuals acted reasonably.

Oral argument — Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2026

The Copyright Act is not an anti-competitive act. It's about looking at the specific use. Your Honor, is it? It aimed to serve as a commercial substitute for Westlaw. … But that's not what the Copyright Act has written.

Oral argument — Youngv.Martin, et.al

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014

And the two guards that are next to him over a period of about four minutes seem to be chatting with each other and joking and laughing during that period. Oh, with each other. … It also relates to other bad acts at other places by other people, not my clients. And as a result, it would be unduly prejudicial in the form of the other bad acts evidence.

Oral argument — Lupian v. Joseph Cory Holdings

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018

Supreme Court in Gettysburg, which involved a claim of the breach of duty in good faith and fair dealing, looked to the point of the claim, that is, whether it had a connection to or reference with the air … As I mentioned before, the 1st Circuit and the 7th Circuit both commented favorably on each person's case.