Documents

Oral argument — +Cleo Inc v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2007

Clio and Crystal, during this period of investigation, were part of the domestic industry, but in the last full year of the commission's investigation period, they shut down production because of disruptions … Would you like to comment? Your Honor, we can also review with our clients their own individual data. It's the third party data that's the real.

Oral argument — North Star Alaska Housing v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2009

That investigation delayed resolution of this case by more than a year, during which period Mr. Peterson, Ms. Kaiser, and others continued to abuse Northstar on almost a daily basis. … This is by statute, by statute under the Contract Disputes Act. Under the Contract Disputes Act and FAR, that is a wholly separate situation. What happens is you have a claim, you try to work it out.

Oral argument — NYCAL OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2013

That's the Vaccine Act case, right? Pardon me? That's the Vaccine Act case. Yes, it is. Which is essentially a tort case. Well, that's right. … And so what the trial court did was identify this one necessary step, the need to obtain air permits, emissions permits, air pollution permits, that kind of thing, and analyze whether or not the operator

Oral argument — General Electric Company v. United Technologies Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

In that case, the District of Columbia enacted a statute or an act that addressed a way to control patented drug prices within the district. That act is actually analogous to the 605 patent. … And so we're at the point of conversations with air framers.

Oral argument — Lazare Kaplan v. Photoscribe Tech

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2010

Alcock, I'd like you to get to an act of conduct which you started to get to. And obviously, you're prepared to defend the district court's ruling that there was intent. … Gresser testified, as I indicated, that his machine couldn't do the precision in a normal office environment without being floated on air.

Oral argument — Huntleigh USA v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

So we say the fact that the contracts were for a period of time subject to termination doesn't affect them. … So the airlines couldn't use Huntley after the act. Huntley's gone.

Oral argument — Klees-Wallace v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2015

The government says it's whether her conduct, quote, breached the LCA, period, end quote. All their arguments stem from that. Maybe it's not final. … And would that decision of the board be reviewable by us at that point because the agency had acted, whether you want to call it ultra-virus or functus officio, the MSPB had acted without authority doing

Oral argument — FORD MOTOR CO v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2011

They Resulted In The Problem In This Case Where You Have Customs Not Acting Over A Period Of Several Years. … To Act. There Was Not Communication Between The Agency. And Ford During The Relevant Period. Of Here. 2005. 2008. That'S Discussed At Pages. 10 To 12. Of The Brief. We Haven'T As Much Talked About.

Oral argument — Moczek v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019

He made a comment in his opinion to support his opinion of failure to prosecute when he said for 11 months in this case, the email process worked perfectly. You got every one of some 34 entries. … I could submit those to the court or I could just identify where the court can find the clean document, but that was submitted on February 16th, 2018.

Oral argument — Micron Tech v. Mosaid Tech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2007

The other seven, which we set forth on page 12 of our reply brief, were patents also in the portfolio, which were made the subject of litigation against Micron's major competitors during the period 2001 … Judgment Act.

Oral argument — Aectra Refining v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009

They require claimants to complete their claims within a period of time. That period of time is within three years in the date of exportation. … So in reality, the prospective provision for the effective date allows claimants to look back three years from the 2004 Trade Act to amend or jiggle with claims that are within that three-year period.

Oral argument — Sihota v. IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2018

That issue was not fully aired at the arbitration. … I mean, the Back Pay Act provides back pay for the period from the unlawful removal until the reinstatement. Right.

Oral argument — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Infobridge Pte. Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2019

We're not relying on the Geneva meeting was a few days after the one-year period. We are relying strictly on the email distribution and then accessibility of the website. … They wanted public comment because you need all of industry to eventually agree to this standard. And so the devices can talk to each other.

Oral argument — Salmon Spawning v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2008

commercial, stays at a fishing lodge, goes off 20 miles offshore into waters that have about 90% of the fish returning to the United States, catches fish, returns to the Canadian lodge, the fish are cleaned … The concern being expressed, I think, by all three of us is that the Court of International Trade had no business in this case, period, full stop.

Oral argument — Hill-Rom Services, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2014

And the third that the District Court relied on is a comment made by an examiner in another case... Does a specification ever recite a wireless connection? … I might agree with you that there are factual differences that on a clean slate we could certainly take a look at. But the problem for me is the language in Pfizer.

Oral argument — Silicon Graphics v. ATI Technologies

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2009

And again, it's section 2.4 of the license that they asserted in the Microsoft, which immunized acts when a combination product was found to infringe the 327 patent. … So all of those comments do not relate to scan conversion.

Oral argument — AKAMAI TECH v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2011

If this Court, I think the case law and the commentators and the history of the Patent Act are such that when you have a method claim, you should be able to combine the acts of two different actors under … So we're talking there about acting in concert, and that's almost the same language that is in comment C. If one of the actors is innocent, then you don't have acting in concert, correct?

Oral argument — PATTERSON v. OOC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2010

But what is the protected act? … As far as this record is concerned, the AOC is as squeaky clean as it could possibly be. The other thing that rises is, Mr.

Oral argument — Krugman v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

He said, the HVAC system, which is being used to supply air to the offices upstairs and the sick people downstairs, is also being used for the surgery rooms. … There had to have been an intervening act. We suggest the intervening act with no disclosures. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. We thank all the parties for their arguments today.

Oral argument — Mukand Intl v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2006

Is it your view that the relevant section of the Administrative Procedure Act creates a cause of action? … logic of that is if Congress should make it easier for small or weakly funded companies to make Commerce do what it should do, then that's up to Congress, not something the court can create out of the air