Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.18s
Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Stewart
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1965
Rev. 423 (1964).. … Noia, supra, at 423.
382 U.S. 937Amicus Curiae Brief — Kucharek v. Hanaway
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
L19SS) cccccccccccccccccs 18 Massachusetts Board of 427 U.S. 307 (1976)...------ 19 a 366 U.S. 420 CLSG6L) ecccccecs 16 413 U.S. 15 (1973)..eeeeeee- 10 48 N-Y.2d 408, 423 N.Y¥.S.2d 470, 399 N.E … Locke, 423 U.S. 48, 49, (1975) (citations omitted).
498 U.S. 1041Amicus Curiae Brief — St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Spiller
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1927
Boyd, 228 U.S. 482 .... 26 Peoples v. Houhtling, 7 Calif. 348 ............eeeeee 16 Philios v. Tiimes, 3B Biine. 163... cc vicccvessnvccscsces 16 Philips v. Grand Trunk Co., 236 U.S. … Williams, 178 Fed. 420, 423; In re A. D. Matthews’ Sons, 238 Fed. 785, 787.
274 U.S. 304Amicus Curiae Brief — USEC, Inc. v. Eurodif S.A. (Nos. 07-1078, 07-1059)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Cir. 2005), aff’d on reh’g, 423 F.3d 1275 (Fed. Cir. 2005), final judgment, 506 F.3d 1051 (Fed. Cir. 2007). … See Eurodif, 423 F.3d at 1277-78 & n.1.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Morrison v. Olson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Sells Eng’a, Inc., 463 U.S. 418, 423-424 (1983); Brown v. United States, 359 U.S. 41, 49 (1959). … Att’y Gen. 482, 487.
487 U.S. 654Amicus Curiae Brief — American Foreign Service Assn. v. Garfinkel
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 482 (1982) (per curiam) (quoting Weinstein v. … Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 149 (1975) (per curiam). 15 that are “capable of repetition, yet evading review,” Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498, 515 (1911), is unavailable.
490 U.S. 153Amicus Curiae Brief — Vasquez v. Thompson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Revision Note to 28 U.S. C. § 2283, at 445 (1988 ed.) … Co., 294 U.S. 648, 675 (1935). That case, in turn, relies on the Kline v.
506 U.S. 1011Amicus Curiae Brief — Zant v. Corn
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Askew, 511 F.2d 710 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 423 U.S. 908 (1975) . 18 TCT We 7 ear anon 415 U.S. 36 (1974) ... —_— a ek 219 0.8. … denied 423 U.S. 908 (1975); Cotton v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 676 F.2d 1368 (llth Cir.), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1041 (1982); Mother's Restaurant, Inc. v.
486 U.S. 1023Amicus Curiae Brief — Gonzales v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Moore, 423 U.S. at 139 (1975). … Moore, 423 U.S. at 130 (1975).
546 U.S. 243Amicus Curiae Brief — Reves v. Ernst & Young
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479 in hei ed ial le ie ee ee re oi Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 741 F.2d 482 (2d Cir. 1984), rev’d, 473 U.S. 479 (1985) ........ … Imrex Co., 741 F.2d 482, 487 (2d Cir. 1984).
507 U.S. 170Amicus Curiae Brief — Goodman v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
McKenzie, 423 F. Supp. 1190, 1194-95 (N.D.W.Va. 1976). … Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342 EER SEN ee ee 10, 14, 15 Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring, 527 U.S. 581 ’ EES ELE IER GILL OPT ETO 27 Overton v.
544 U.S. 1031Amicus Curiae Brief — Commissioner v. Texaco Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
First Security Bank, 405 U.S. 394 (1972), this Court held that section 482 does not author- —— 3 ize the Commissioner to allocate income to a party that is prohibited by law from receiving it. … interpretation of section 482.
520 U.S. 1185Amicus Curiae Brief — Morgan v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
. at 423-424. … Witt, 469 U.S. at 423. “It is beyond dispute” that the law requires sentencers in capital cases to consider mitigating circum- stances. Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367, 374 (1988).
504 U.S. 719Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 25, 2024
Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) .................... 3 Hudson v. Michigan, 335 U.S. 586 (2006) ............... 26 Jimerson v. Lewis, 94 F.4th 423 (5th Cir. 2024) ..... 22 Johnson v. … Madrid, 592 U.S. 306, 314 (2021). This rule made it possible for officers HALE, supra note 12, at 482 (bold added). L.B.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Ane, 423 So.2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982), aff’d, 458 So.2d 239 (Fla. | RE We nN ren ee Rees PET OSS 6 New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) ..4-6, 21, 23 Newell v. … Lehigh County Humane Soc’y, 482 A.2d 266, 269 (I’a.
472 U.S. 1025Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Black
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Barry, 485 U.S. 312 (1988). … Code § 18.2-423 to be unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable.
538 U.S. 343Amicus Curiae Brief — Hartford Fire Insurance v. California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Rogers, 357 U.S. 197 (1958) ....... 19 Société Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v. U.S. Dist. Court §.D. Iowa, 482 U.S. 522 (1987).............. 9,10 Steele v. … Court S.D. lowa, 482 U.S, 522 (1987) (construing the France: Societe Fruehauf Corporation v.
509 U.S. 766Amicus Curiae Brief — Texas v. Johnson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Spence, 418 U.S. at 423 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting). … Wilson, 40S U.S. 518, $23 (1972). Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 4$1, 107 S.Ct. 2502, 2510 (1987).
491 U.S. 397Amicus Curiae Brief — Pierce County v. Guillen
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 IIT ceiesiceiaienttetttastnlameesiatintsiaieniiitaiamaniaiitibiaes 16, 17, 18, 25 United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).............ccc0000 19 West Virginia v. U.S. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 505-06 & nn. 9 & 10 (1997) (Stevens, J., dissenting) (listing statutes).
537 U.S. 129Amicus Curiae Brief — Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006)... mse chia aed saulaiecleec mn Griglev v. … (quoting 14 Conmrick, 461 U.S. at 154).
564 U.S. 379
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.