Documents

Oral argument — AG der Dillinger Huttenwerke v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2025

So in the model match, the Department of Commerce will have a comment period where they say we'll look at these 12 characteristics and this is what we propose. … And then everybody has an opportunity to comment during that model match period and then the questionnaire comes out with that model match.

Oral argument — Owens v. VA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2006

So she had a clean record and 28 years of adequate service. Yes, Your Honor. And she had satisfactory performance ratings year after year after year. Isn't that also true? Yes, Your Honor. … For a long period of time, she's been an employee for- See, to me, the question is whether a six-month suspension without pay, for example, would have been punishment that fits the conduct.

Oral argument — University of Utah v. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2017

So let me look at that three-week period. Their expert agrees that there was nothing done, zero, by Dr. Tuchel who received a courtesy copy of the mini-review during that three-week period. … Let me address that comment. The deposition had pages and pages of questions about what happened in that conversation in Uppsala.

Oral argument — +Catalyst & Chemical v. Global Ground

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2006

If you notice, this passage is saying simultaneously capable of de-icing and anti-icing and or cleaning and rinsing both the underside and the topside. … and pressurized air?

Oral argument — ABBEY v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2013

Here, the unlimited number of credit hours were worked and paid to the air traffic controllers. … bound by Title V, they can write on a clean slate, and they can adopt a rule that makes them not bound by the Fair Labor Standards Act, apparently.

Oral argument — Weithoner v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2007

Plus, it's impossible for people, while you can remove things from the file, for people not to remember, at least over a certain period of time, what happened. That's correct, Your Honor. … It would certainly be appropriate to place whether it be a comment of, you know, to the extent Ms. Withhonor seeks employment elsewhere within the Postal Service or to another employer.

Oral argument — In Re Rau

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2016

And then if we compare that to—if we look at A79 to what applicant says is their summary of claimed subject matter, we say that it says that the composition can prevent tooth decay, clean teeth, reduce … I don't see that as a fair argument because when in 55 on—in period 19 of Amon, when it talks about TRIS, it says it can be used in combination with other suitable buffers.

Oral argument — Immunocept v. Fulbright & Jaworski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2007

Was there no call for supplemental briefing to address jurisdiction once this case was identified to be listed as a related case and heard by the same panel as the air measurement? … In terms of scope of employment, he made two comments. One of them was that it doesn't matter. He said, we have two orders, one from the sermon judgment and one on the oath of denial motion.

Oral argument — Internation Customs Products v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2006

Those protections include that we get notice, we have an opportunity for comment, and we have a grace period of 60 days if there's going to be a revocation or modification of that ruling. … period.

Oral argument — In Re Grant

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019

How do I clean up the ground? And so the invention says, OK, into the ground, blow some oxygen, generate some heat, and get smoldering combustion going. … Although eight patent offices around the world have allowed claims to this technology, leading to patent grants in 31 countries, the board has acted otherwise.

Oral argument — Minneapolis Community v. GSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2010

Because you had to deliver a clean site on November of 1993. … They weren't entitled to a clean site, and therefore they're not entitled to indemnification because a clean site wasn't delivered. The whole concept here was public bodies...

Oral argument — Orion IP v. Hyundai Motor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009

But, Counsel, there's nothing clean about that issue, is there? I think it is, Your Honor. I'll be interested in hearing how you clean it up. Okay. … The court never made a comment about it at the time the motion was made. The other side never made a comment about it at the time the motion was made.

Oral argument — Arista Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2018

And the statutory purpose is to clean up bad patents. … I'm going to follow my statutory mission to clean up bad patents. And those other doctrines may or may not be as related to that statute.

Oral argument — Gaymar Industries, Inc. v. Cincinnati Sub-zero Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2015

It violates the principles of the Patent Act. … Under the Lanham Act, you mean? No, under the Copyright Act.

Oral argument — MCGachey v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2010

This is not an individual with a clean disciplinary record who has for the first time violated an offense. Ms. … Force directive or Air Force instruction.

Oral argument — In Re Whittaker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2009

Well, but nobody acts on it. But your claim doesn't exclude brushes. We don't exclude a lot of things, but brushes... But that's a problem, is it not? No, it's not a problem. … They don't say that the bristles are the only parts of the vacuum cleaner that contact the surface to be cleaned. They don't say they block the roller from being cleaned.

Oral argument — Lutz v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

Without the personnel comments. Pardon? Without the personnel comments. Correct. Without the adverse supervisor statements and any negative statements along those lines. … Weren't the comments negative? They were negative. They certainly were not positive. They weren't neutral either.

Oral argument — Rick's Mushroom Service v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2008

and thus a violation of the Clean Water Act. … The government had a mandate to clean up this waterway. There was a government act. As I said, it's the Watershed Protection Flood Prevention Act.

Oral argument — IN RE PACKARD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

Packard's application that have no basis in the Patent Act. … I think that the Board did not, was not, it was not correct in saying that there was no comment, no other comment on point with respect to the other rejections.

Oral argument — The Centech Group v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2008

It says the contract may not be awarded, period. Doesn't that control? … Now, there was no question about this all the way throughout the period of proposal evaluations. No one questioned CENTEC's intent and capability to comply.