Documents

Oral argument — City of Vandalia v. G & T Holdings, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2012

The context of the legislative history, which I've taken pains to discover and put out in my brief, starting with the Illinois Clean Indoor Air Act in 1990, and then moving forward to the Smoke-Free Illinois … It's consistently always been in either the Clean Indoor Air Act or in the Smoke-Free Illinois Act, which repealed the Illinois Clean Indoor Air Act.

Oral argument — People v. Travis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2013

if you're going to act like a man or act like a kid about this. … He made a comment, but he didn't wait around for an answer. It was not a comment that was intended to elicit an incriminating response. Remember the comment. I'm sorry? Remember the comment.

Oral argument — BMW Financial Services, NA v. Auto Showcase, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2017

You've got to go beyond the Secretary of State's office because we presume that the Secretary of State will act in accordance with the documentation submitted to it. … Can you address that last point hanging in the air? Yeah. So the language on a duplicate certificate title, you have to presume is purposeful.

Oral argument — People v. Meakens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2020

Because, for example, I mean, I don't know how clean of a car the defendant keeps. But, for example, ashes are something that dissipate and go away or can be cleaned out. … And like I said, someone who's thinking or acting with ordinary care would not act the way the defendant did.

Oral argument — People v. Gallas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

Taylor, can you comment on the defendant's argument that he was partially acting in self defense? … Can you comment on that argument? Yes, um, yes, the defendants are testified during trial that he was the self defense. For all periods, correct?

Oral argument — Admiral Heating & Ventilating, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

So that was still followed in the 45-day period, irrespective of anything else, correct? Correct. He omitted timely notice, basically. That's correct. … I mean, they didn't just pull this out of the air. Didn't they give reasons why they found in favor of the claimant?

Oral argument — Vines v. Village of Flossmoor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2017

I'm saying that once we were alerted to the error, we acted expediently. So since you filed it within that 30-day period, you feel that this court has jurisdiction. We do. … And again, I think if you look at our motion to amend, we acted timely and expeditiously as soon as we became aware. Counsel commented that we did not file a motion for leave to amend.

Oral argument — Huddleston v. Trame

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2025

He has a clean criminal record. He has never been convicted of anything that I'm aware of. … For further proceedings, explain to the court that, well, no, there isn't any sort of grace period, immunization period, period that the statute doesn't apply.

Oral argument — Badillo v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2015

Did they say specifically that the development of the radiculopathy could develop, progress over a period of time? … The nerve problems developed over a period of time, and the proof is, I mean, how can you lie?

Oral argument — Excelsior Garage Parking, Inc. v. 1250 North Dearborn Condominium Ass'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2015

And the plaintiffs in their brief said, well, if the association is concerned about time of performance, the Illinois law just imposes a reasonable period of time to perform the act. … And the courts have commented on that that's exactly the types of-that's what the declaratory judgment act is for, is to address these liberal-to be liberally applied and to address a situation where you

Oral argument — Barber v. American Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2009

And as of this date, there's no – Well, the issue is – I see the issue is the period under Gelb, the period of time from when a lawsuit is filed to the time that the picking off occurs, that the time there's … So that, and we cited the case Air Freight, Emory Air Freight, pardon me, that specifically provides that such a provision nullifies any oral representations or amendments to an agreement.

Oral argument — Brunton v. Kruger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2012

We actually believe there was a period of time between the time the first settlor passed away, that was Helen, and then the second, Gordon, whereby Gordon, we believe, cleaned out a large part of the contents … Regarding the husband cleaning out the house, if the executor wasn't there during his lifetime, seeing that it was cleaned out, I don't know how the executor would know that a 90-year-old man cleaned it

Oral argument — People v. Kindhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

And also, the defendant did testify that if part of his conversation with Special Agent Cooke was described in a police report, it came out of thin air. … And so we not only had the extraordinary circumstances of his cleaning it out, cleaning out the pipe, but also there could have been other people who had used the pipe in the meantime.

Oral argument — Tribbett-Dix v. Kitchen/Bath Industry Show and Conference

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2010

We had no responsibility for cleaning of the aisles. We had no responsibility for cleaning of the booths. Our function was to be there during the move-out period between 730 in the morning and 5 p.m. … Well, move-out is actually a four- or five-day period for a show this big.

Oral argument — People v. Masterson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2018

We don't get to the abuse of discretion unless we say that it's plain air. This wasn't preserved. We argued that this was preserved. Was it included in a post-trial motion? … Overall, what the comments show and what his statements to everyone show is that he believed he was justified in what he did. He thought he was acting in self-defense.

Oral argument — Ramshaw Real Estate v. Illinois Properties

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2013

For the period before October 9 or for the period after October 9? Before October 9. Well, until it was terminated, you're talking about a fiduciary obligation. … Just clean right. I don't want to misrepresent. Just clean right. But no, not as to made right cleaning or John Doe painting. No, not at all.

Oral argument — Behl v. Duffin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2010

These people agree to, I think, obey the Clean Air Act and OSHA and all sorts of things. … Her reference to the Clean Air Act and all the rest of this, this is obviously these are contracts that are designed to deal with major suppliers of some sort, where people are going to be involved, as

Oral argument — City of Eureka v. Knobloch

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2024

defense and it's essentially a general denial um of the brief the lamarow versus havronic case i actually had the site wrong it's 25 ill app second 51 um this is a case uh involving the civil practice act … my client the way it appropriately should have been given those the notice issues the lack of notice issues were raised from the the court review it from abroad uh under the 366 or the or or the plain air

Oral argument — Mlynarczyk v. PNC Financial

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2018

That is something that's a fact that can be utilized to infer that it had been there for a significant period of time. … Your position is obviously that given those facts, the trial court acting as the gatekeeper was entitled to preclude that expert testimony because it had no foundation of facts.

Oral argument — Sterigenics US, LLC v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2010

They let it vent for three to five minutes so the rear venting system cleans the air. This is a heavily regulated chemical. Now it's clean. So what does he say? … First thing I'd like to comment on is we've heard about a cascade of symptoms. That's Mr. Zmanski's phrase.