Documents

Oral argument — Clatsop Residents Against WalM v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2018

And that is fundamentally at odds with the whole point of the cumulative impact analysis required by the NEPA and the Clean Water Act. … And Council references a site to a prior form of the Clean Water Act regulations.

Oral argument — National TPS Alliance v. Noem

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2025

Indeed, what the secretary did here was following the statutory default period of a 60-day wind-down period and explained in all three cases why that 60 days was appropriate. … And so we have a clean argument that this claim is not subject to the bar.

Oral argument — FMC Corporation v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2019

And that went on for a period of time. Well, maybe I can ‑‑ Did it go on for a period of time? Is there a yes or no in your vocabulary? Yes. It did go on for a time. … They were simply tanker rail cars that FMC deemed too dangerous to clean out, so they just dumped them and sent them down into the hole.

Oral argument — United States v. Business Recovery Services LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2012

What is the evidence of the purpose of the Telemarketing Recovery Act? Do we have any legislative history here? … The regulation itself has – the exemption has – itself has an exemption for retail sales of non-durable office or cleaning supplies.

Oral argument — John Schroeder v. Jeff Premo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

Cummins was the cleaning lady. There was a delay of eight months. The Supreme Court has said in Neal that a delay of seven months is a severely hamper, severely troubling to the court. … And in that case, if, if the pre-trial publicity is so extensive, and this is the Rudeau case, it's a 20 minute confession aired repeatedly.

Oral argument — Redwood City v. Shell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2005

In terms of the compliance with the NCP prong, the Port below made no comment on that. … They didn't get public comment on the various plans. They didn't respond to those public comments.

Oral argument — Akiak Native Community v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2010

Citizens enforcing Clean Water Act requirements in a permitting decision have no financial stake in the case, but they do have a very strong interest in protecting clean water. … And the Clean Water Act has a higher standard for allowing people to get into court because citizens were meant to help supplement the government's ability to enforce the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — William New v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2013

Clean the gun, it goes off. He did it, no question about it. The other is hotly disputed. He vehemently denies he did it. … That sounds like a jury argument and not an argument for saying that a state court acted unreasonably.

Oral argument — Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. v. Newmont USA Limited

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2012

And a Citizens Group filed suit to say you're in violation of the some environmental, I think the Clean Air Act, since day one, starting 25 years ago. The court said that's okay. … It's the expenditures are, A, made over a long period of time, as they were here, $700 million over an 11‑year period. So that's one.

Oral argument — Fairhurst v. Hagener

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2005

was a waste and a pollutant for purposes of the Clean Water Act, triggering the protective provisions of that Act. … be some Clean Water Act protection in that if it's not done in accordance with the label, the Clean Water Act protections apply.

Oral argument — RHOADES v. AVON PRODUCTS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2007

It can't just come out of thin air. … Under the Lanham Act, a trademark holder has two methods of enforcing their rights.

Oral argument — UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2011

With respect to Trident, as the court knows, it was a clean air act case. … Because the Trident case, which this Court had before, was a clear Clean Air Act case, and the Champion case was a contract case that was applying a law from the state of Idaho.

Oral argument — State of California v. Neville Chemical Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

But you don't have a draft remedial action plan within the statutory period. I mean, that would be a clean-cut matter, which is not completely under control of the State, but it doesn't work here. … And that comment period happens after the draft remedial action plan is put out for public review, in this case in March of 95, and before the Department makes its final decision.

Oral argument — Ecology Center, Inc. v. Kimbell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

The Solicitor General's brief noted that there is an exception to that when the statute implementing a regulation specifically provides for pre-enforcement review, such as the Clean Air Act, and that was … Now, it's true that in many contexts an agency doesn't need to accede to the comments, the public comments. It doesn't have to choose a specific commenter's path.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Jenkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011

During that period of time that he was in the hospital. He walked out of the hospital that same day. That is correct. With a clean bill of health. I'm not sure I'd go that far, Your Honor. … It means it was different than he normally acts. He wasn't his normal self. He had maintained that he didn't do this this entire period of time, and now he maintains it again. I didn't do this.

Oral argument — Sino Clean Energy, Inc. v. Robert Seiden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2018

It matters, Your Honor, because of what happened in the interim time period. … Ren and Sino Clean Energy are attempting to do.

Oral argument — Ernesto Martinez v. Charles Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2019

And I thought I would at least comment briefly on, I think, what the implications of Sprites are for Mr. Martinez's case. Judge McKeon Let me speak for myself only. … And he then filed something called a ruling saying that my request to have further comments about our discussion memorialized somehow was denied.

Oral argument — United States v. Thing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2004

I mean, contrary to what defense says, there was an act, a significant impediment. … So we, perhaps where we might only have, had she come clean, like Judge Bea mentioned earlier, we would not have had significant investigation as a result of that.

Oral argument — Neona Modoc v. Andrew Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2021

fairly attributed because of the different time periods involved. … So I'd like to hear your comments on that. Sure, Your Honor. There's no question that there is conflicting evidence in this case, as you point out, Judge Ferguson.

Oral argument — Henry Weiland v. American Airlines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2015

Now, Judge Selma, the District Court judge, made one helpful comment to this Court about that period. … And does it apply to most other air carriers? I couldn't speak to most.