Documents

Oral argument — Jeffery Mays v. Ronald Sprinkle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2020

Wouldn't that be because, as Judge Diaz alluded to or commented directly, that it implicates maybe this is so up in the air and loose in terms of standards that it's not clearly established. … And again, for example, how each of these defendants only interacted with the decedent over a certain period of time. Not one of them was present from the very beginning to the very end.

Oral argument — Juanita Cavendish v. DOWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025

Your Honor, the way the form is actually calculated, it's based on a, essentially, there's a calculation under the Act, and the calculation under the Act is did you work for X amount of time during each … Maybe there were periods of unemployment. Definitely possible, Your Honor. Maybe they had coal strikes, maybe it wasn't that, maybe they didn't go to work.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Martinovich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2015

And those comments are also important because he's talking about the history of the guidelines. He references the Crime Control Act. … With regard to the comments, she . . . Ms.

Oral argument — In Re: John McFadden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2016

If we act here, does that keep him from going to state court? No. No, Your Honor. No, it does not. So what does holding an abeyance do? Nothing. … So active incarceration was six if you kept your nose clean and then you got to go home. Well, Your Honor, that's exactly the point, if you kept your nose clean.

Oral argument — Mounia Elyazidi v. SunTrust Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2015

The Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act has an intent requirement. That is not in the Maryland Consumer Protection Act. … That's a number pulled out of thin air, and I have a hard time believing that it's 20 hours in every single case in which they file an affidavit. It's not.

Oral argument — United States v. Alexander Treisman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2023

The issue is that when the officers decide to act, you have to look to see if the primary motivation is an impound and inventory under their code, or if they have a motivation to look for evidence of crime … But it was within a fairly short period of time.

Oral argument — Tracy Sempowich v. Tactile Systems Technology

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2021

Resh, other than during the time period he was actively advocating for Semplewich's removal. That is the only time period during which such spreadsheets were created. Do we know when he created? … So you're talking about a very discrete time period during which these spreadsheets were being generated, which, according to Resh's testimony, is also the same time period during which he was actively

Oral argument — T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. The Loudoun County Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2013

Clearly, we're dealing with a limited preemption in this act. … I think about over the period of those various hearings, three or four of the supervisors were concerned about it.

Oral argument — GW Acquisition Co., LLC v. Pageland Limited Liability Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2025

Brower's own acts and deeds show that the exclusivity provision was of no moment to him. … It's not something that could be acted upon. But Your Honors don't even need to consider that, because Mr.

Oral argument — Travelers Indemnity Company v. Portal Healthcare Solutions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2016

I just want to make sure we had jurisdiction and the record's cleaned up. And you're satisfied it is? … I guess I would take issue with the comment or the characterization of leaving the server unlocked as posting.

Oral argument — Honeywell International, Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

Can I just ask you to comment on one thing? I'm just back to the jurisdictional point. Sorry, I'm totally stuck there. You probably figured that out. … Because that's what you need to have this not merely be patents in the air. Let me ask you.

Oral argument — James Lane v. John Anderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2016

He says, your comments were intended to derail an internal investigation about an important matter. … Under Title VII, under Title II of the ADA, under the Rehab Act, there's never any dispute there.

Oral argument — Jeremiah Henderson v. Austin McClain

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2022

And the probable cause should be mitigated by my time, by my time's up, by his failure to act prior to that. Thank you. Well, I think you have some rebuttal time. Yes, ma'am. … Also, I'd like to clean up the record with one other thing. On October 15, one of the reasons why the sergeant directed Officer McLean to go back and re-interview people is he did not speak with Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Jamie Henderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

when the defendant, for example, does four hand-to-hand transactions in Government 16A, and we have photos of this in our brief, there is someone sitting probably from me to my counsel table chair on an air … And what they saw was an eight-day period. There's also no testimony about how long Mr. Henderson had been at that trailer.

Oral argument — Expo Properties, LLC v. Experient, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2020

You get a benefit in the fact that you can charge future additional tenants a whole lot more rent by virtue of that air conditioning system and the like. … That is merely confirmation of what has been happening for the entire 20-year period of the lease, whether the tenant was originally Galaxy, whether the tenant was Experient, or whether it was Experient

Oral argument — Damian Stinnie v. Richard Holcomb

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022

Well, didn't the commissioner's letter asking the General Assembly, would you please act so we don't have to pay more attorney's fees in this litigation, tie the two things together? … It's a very clean rule. That may not be satisfying, but that is one virtue of having a bright line rule.

Oral argument — Stanley Penley v. McDowell County Board of Ed.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017

So five years, a lapse of five years between the act that you say gave rise to the suspension and the actual suspension, that's quite a period of time. … And the time period between the inappropriate comments and the suspension and the investigation was, in contrast to the time period between the political activity, amazingly short.

Oral argument — Mark Guthrie v. PHH Mortgage Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2023

So during a bankruptcy and divorce, you always clean up title. … And during this time period, he was promoted.

Oral argument — Manuel Moreno v. Carol Bosholm

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2025

I think those were aired out in the earlier hearing, and we really just want to hear from you about this one issue that has gotten us tied in knots, and hopefully you'll be able to help us with that. … Under the federal claim, the federal rules of evidence apply, period. There's no question that Dr. Bilbrow is competent under the federal rules.

Oral argument — Adrian Scott v. Maryland State Dept. of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2016

Your Honor, I believe there are racial comments that were made, other than the fact that Ms. … appearance for him, the time for service of process, the 120 days, arrived And I was in a position to only be able to prepare the opposition to the motion to dismiss With the intention, Your Honor, of cleaning