Documents

Oral argument — Sixela v. Hope Federal Credit Union

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2026

She'd been somewhat of a shorter period of time. … You have a corporate plaintiff who has to and cannot act on its own.

Oral argument — United States v. John Farrar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2017

That case was decided on whether the statute at issue, the CPPA, the Child Pornography Prevention Act, was overbroad or not. … You instead talk about plain-air review. Well, I think plain-air review is kind of the best he can hope for.

Oral argument — Texas Medical Association v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2025

On the merits, to protect patients from ruinous surprise medical bills, Congress enacted the Surprise Act. … And for patients, the QPA can determine the cost-sharing responsibility, meaning a comment saying, oh, in terms of co-pay, or in terms of independent document.

Oral argument — State of Louisiana v. i3 Verticals

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2023

instance of failure to act that is specifically outlined in 48J. … That is a specific act that starts and stops. That's not a continuing tort.

Oral argument — Clean Water Opportunities, Inc v. The Willamette V

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

Within a short period of time, EPS goes down to $12.95, which is substantially below what the defendants were charging. … You undertake acts to maintain your monopoly.

Oral argument — Strife v. AISD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

I've got to work in the heat and somebody else gets to work under air conditioning. We are literally talking environments. Go ahead. … I mean, the delay has to do with facts, and that's what was going on during that six-month period. Correct.

Oral argument — United States v. Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

So the credibility of the testimony is clear air. There was only one witness who testified here, so clear air on the facts. De novo for conclusions of law reached by the court. … Conclusions of law, de novo, conclusions of fact, clear air. Right. That's the standard. OK. Thank you, Your Honor. Ms.

Oral argument — Houston SportsNet Finance, LLC v. Houston R

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2016

in its interests as a creditor, was acting instead for anti-competitive reasons. … And in fact, Comcast was exclusively the party that aired the network. No other party was airing the network during that period of time. So Comcast got the benefit. Meanwhile, what did the teams get?

Oral argument — Koch Project v. Alliance Proc Prt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2022

Do nothing and let the allegation stand or assert its own claims through a declaratory judgment action to air those erroneous, to clear the air about those erroneous allegations. Mr. … But corporations act through individuals. As Triton noted to the district court, KPS's court. I have a question. What are you at?

Oral argument — North Port Frfgtr Pension v. Temple-Inland, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2014

Now, once you've done that, you're not going to immediately come clean on the financial statements. … And Dubuque, if that's his name, was actually purchasing stock during the same period.

Oral argument — Yochanan Markman v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., et a

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

This is a suit under the Exchange Act, right? Yes, it is. And the PSLRA, yes. What specifically is the claim with respect to the accuracy of the financial statements? There is a claim about that. … He was Whole Foods' designate throughout the California investigation, which started before the class period and continued through the class period.

Oral argument — United States v. Nicholas Schofield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2015

Under the Adam Walsh Act, which is actually what SORNA is enforcing now, you have a minimum as a Tier 1 sex offender, 15 years. … Of course, we know that if you serve 10 years of that period of time successfully, you can petition the District Court to have your registry reduced to the 10 years.

Oral argument — Crusader Gun Group v. James

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2024

I withdraw my comment. But is your view, though, that what was going on in Cargill is going on here? No, but the key here is, the ATF does not have the power to impute anything to Allen Ehrenstein. … , change their name, and get a clean slate.

Oral argument — Imperium Insurance Company v. Shelton & Associates

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018

That claims made really has no meaning if you're going to say, did you have knowledge that you had done the act, whatever act it is that's now being charged as malpractice during the claims period, the … claim made period.

Oral argument — Washington v. Sunflower County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2024

The district attorney, was that your comment, Your Honor? … Just right out of thin air? That's not anything in the complaint that they were having a discussion about the bids.

Oral argument — Donald Calhoun v. Jack Doheny Companies, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2020

And then for them not to act on it, we've had six, seven months. Okay, I'm going to ask you whether the district court denied an evidentiary hearing. … So that's what, that, I didn't do it because it wasn't actually in the order allowing me to do it, even though he did make that comment.

Oral argument — Merritt Hawkins & Associates v. Larry Gresham, et

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

He pulled it totally out of the air, da-da-da-da, but jury does what they do. And so you get something that maybe is logical, but where is it inherently so defective? … Gresham over the 12-month period, and his non-compete runs for 12 months. That's the amount of profit the company lost.

Oral argument — Mildred Fitzpatrick v. Pontotoc County, Mis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2015

In all those cases and throughout the history of jurisprudence under the Civil Rights Act and under the Age Discrimination Act, there has never been any retreat by the United States Supreme Court or by … So when he sends in his 28-J, you may have some comment. Or maybe you have a comment now. Yeah.

Oral argument — CAE Integrated v. Moov Technologies

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2022

We are four years past the period when Mr. Meisner stopped working for CAE. No non-compete would be enforceable for that period of time. … As to balance of the equities, it is perfectly clear that to get equity, you must come to the court with clean hands, and quite simply, CAE does not. Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Larremore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2025

I think get your bolt cutter still leaves it very much up in the air whether Mr. Laramore is consenting to a search of the trailer. Is it a type of consent for him to say, bring your dog? … And after the hang on for a second comment, pick it up again there and go through his observation of the open container.