Documents

Oral argument — IN RE RIGGS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2011

You go up to the Board and it's all very clean. You file an appeal. They file an answer. You don't bring anything up new in your answer, so there's no cert reply and you lose when you come here. … Some of the supporting comments are different. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 12, second paragraph is verbatim the same as the rejection that was in the case before.

Oral argument — KELLOGG v. NIKE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2011

It had to be acted on by the court. The court granted our motion without any conditions. … This was an effort to streamline the presentation of our case, period.

Oral argument — ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN v. CANADY TECHNO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2010

It alleged a conspiracy to violate Section 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. … So you have competing interests under the Patent Act that also are at play here.

Oral argument — Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

over count two of Harmonia's amended and restated complaint Which alleged that the face of a lethics as proposal gave the contracting officer reason to question its size representation The claims court aired … trial court recognized would significantly undermine compliance with SBA Regulations by allowing a plaintiff to circumvent the established time frame for filing a timely size protest You want to make any comments

Oral argument — Finisar Corp v. DirecTV Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2008

That is programming that, like turnaround programming, is just beamed through the air. It's not downloaded under our construction of that term requiring retention. … Well because the overarching goal of JXE when it describes teletext is to accomplish the transmission of the most possible material within the shortest period of time.

Oral argument — Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

This particular air conditioning unit is not working. But that doesn't mean you're remotely configuring anything. … So if you have a comment on that, go ahead. If not, we'll close it up.

Oral argument — Schick v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2008

Well, the hearing is provided for in Section 641D of the Act. … In the event that they do produce it within the required time period, it will not be revoked. So you're saying that the language is and may thereafter be revoked is not really discretionary.

Oral argument — Trudell Medical International Inc. v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2024

He never submitted an expert report, period, in this case on the issue of non-infringement. But even if you assume that these declarations that I'm sure D.R. … The kinds of comments that he made. Has the Fourth Circuit looked at him in particular making the same kinds of comments in another case? Yes.

Oral argument — Wesley Corporation v. Zoom T v. Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019

Did your client act immediately when he went online and found the Stuffs information? … That's acting immediately. Zoom and Idea Village had the obligation to act immediately, not my client. It was their—they were put on notice upon signing that settlement agreement.

Oral argument — Snyder v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

We cited the Federal Technology Transfer Act that dates back to 1980, Title 15, United States Code of 3710. … The working capital fund pays her salary for that period, and the CRADA comes back to reimburse it for that period.

Oral argument — VISTAN CORPORATION v. FADEI USA, IN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2013

Now, the specification discloses three alternative embodiments of that Act of Assembly and the actuator included in it. … Of course, I'll leave my comments to the conditional prosecutor.

Oral argument — Love v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

If they don't act on the request, then you can ask for a mandamus to force them to act on it. And if you do appeal it, then under Rule 8, you can ask that the payments continue pending appeal. … The reason we're here today is because we don't have that option because of how the board has acted.

Oral argument — BENCOMO v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2012

He might try to clean it up a little bit, but, quite honestly, that he had already made a sworn false statement. … What happened is, 935 was an informant for ICE for a relatively short period of time, 2002 to 2003. She then gets deactivated, but she stays in the drug business independently.

Oral argument — Edgewell Personal Care Brands v. Albaad Massuot Yitzhak, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2019

Their position, really from the get-go, is that Koch is a clean slate. It has no ranges, no ratios, it only has a single value, but nobody knows what it is. So, it provides no information. … But there's one email which has some comments made. There is indeed that email, Your Honor.

Oral argument — NYCAL OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2013

That's the Vaccine Act case, right? Pardon me? That's the Vaccine Act case. Yes, it is. Which is essentially a tort case. Well, that's right. … And so what the trial court did was identify this one necessary step, the need to obtain air permits, emissions permits, air pollution permits, that kind of thing, and analyze whether or not the operator

Oral argument — JENNINGS v. SSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2010

They're expected to act professionally and do what they're supposed to do. The SSA has offices all over Atlanta? Well, the hearing sites. … In other words, he kept himself clean at the military side.

Oral argument — CLOER v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2011

What would be the reason to have a different rule for the federal limitations period and the subsequent state limitations period? … You need to clean up some precedent. Absolutely. I want to address the significance of the table, how it works, what the standard is, the impact of it being updated, and I'm not being glib here.

Oral argument — Trustees of Columbia v. Symantec Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

And then the claims would be directed at monitoring when a group of computers, all of which are already infected with a worm, act in a way that differs from how an already infected computer acts. … And their expert does say, and I'll just quote the language, it is sometimes difficult to find clean, attack-free training sets for training an intrusion detection model.

Oral argument — Reyes v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2025

Here all they have is that it must be filed within a reasonable time period, which, when left to the discretion of a pro se appellant, leaves very questionable when that reasonable time period runs, correct … And of course, everything about the settlement agreement is now publicly aired in your filings.

Oral argument — +Cleo Inc v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2007

Clio and Crystal, during this period of investigation, were part of the domestic industry, but in the last full year of the commission's investigation period, they shut down production because of disruptions … Would you like to comment? Your Honor, we can also review with our clients their own individual data. It's the third party data that's the real.