Documents

Oral argument — Deana Denham v. Michael Astrue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2012

The claim that she does these spurts of housework in short periods of time and then is laid out for long periods of the day really is not consistent with the type of work she was doing, specifically caring … Because the jobs that the ALJ came up with were based on his RFC, which was made up out of thin air. This woman cannot stand for six hours in an eight-hour day.

Oral argument — Squaw Valley v. Goldberg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2004

But these people are acting on behalf of the board. They're enforcing board regulation. … Peacock was missing violations on the mountain during that time period? And Mr.

Oral argument — Sylvester Owino v. CoreCivic, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2022

And it does not require any other detainee to clean common living areas. And it also does not require any detainee to clean. … They both, as we noted in our papers, worked and worked within the time period of when the complaint was filed.

Oral argument — COXON v. SEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2005

I have a few comments I want to make in response to the SEC's brief, since we didn't file a reply brief. … I simply don't, I don't know how long the period would have been. Because that raises the question in my mind, at least.

Oral argument — Moapa Band of Paiutes v. BLM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

Probably the most important issue that's been raised in the briefs and that you've raised in your comments is the issue of impacts to the air quality and the public health from hydrogen sulfide and dust … Page 31 of the EA, if you look at the very last sentence on that page, it tells you exactly what period of time the air quality data was gathered. From July 1, 2006 for a full year.

Oral argument — Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2025

And if EPA or the Army Corps of Engineers does not have jurisdiction to enforce the Clean Water Act with regard to a body of water, then neither does a private citizen. … Where Sackett came out, there was an open question then as to, you know, whether there was a viable Clean Water Act to be had or to go forward.

Oral argument — Landon Young v. Chemguard, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2022

That, you know, he's covered at fire scenes, cleaning things up. I mean, he might as well have an AFFF suit that he's walking around in. … They've separately sold the mil-spec foam to the Air Force Base. When the mil-spec foam was used at the Air Force Base, it got into the groundwater.

Oral argument — Kich v. Reno

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2005

It now had a much longer situation and acted consistently with that in the future. … The comment is submitted, Your Honor. Thank you. The case just argued is submitted for decision.

Oral argument — United States v. Geofredo Littlebird, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

Littleburg engaged in an affirmative act by initiating the interview as opposed to reacting to some inquiry from law enforcement suggests that this was in fact a voluntary act of free will, which is what … This wasn't a situation as in Washington or Davis or other cases where they're basically saying, well, you know, we found this on you, come clean or let us have a search.

Oral argument — Virtual Global Hldgs. v. Rearden, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2020

So neither chain of title is clean. But if we're going to talk about unclean hands, unclean hands relates to the equitable conduct of the parties towards each other. … These were not the acts of a person who thought he had the right to do what he was doing.

Oral argument — VACEK v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2006

Against the Air Force. Against the Air Force. My the issue, if I recall the Bailey case, Your Honor, that was a case where an attorney mailed it. There are two cases that are very similar. … I just wanted to take a moment to comment on a couple of other things that I heard.

Oral argument — NLRB v. HTH Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2012

You didn't contest that the hotel violated the act by using the PBHM as a middleman. … So I just wanted to clean that up, because I think that's still a misunderstanding. And I also wanted to point out, as it relates to the one vote, remember this was the second election.

Oral argument — Mansoor v. Zaandam M/V

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2008

Okay, to watch for them, clean them up, to log them in. … Then you don't have to worry about did they do anything to clean it up.

Oral argument — FTC v. Enforma Natural Products, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2003

I don't know if the monkey business comment was directed to counsel or in some other context. … Well, I think that assumes a conclusion as to the function of the advisor, whether he's acting like a law clerk or he's acting like a court-appointed expert who essentially has the ability, essentially

Oral argument — Andrade v. Roche

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2005

There was a considerable period of time that elapsed. I'm sorry. There was about two years between the time of the complaint of discrimination and the acts that your client asserts were retaliatory. … And our case law suggests that a lapse of a long period of time dissipates the inference of retaliation.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert McGill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2014

The same thing with, well, she must have suffered for, you know, a significant period of time before she passed away. It could have been a minute or two. … And if she had resolved it, then this Court could say, well, did she get that right or wrong under clear air?

Oral argument — Tiffany Nicholson v. Hyannis Air Service, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2009

There was no criticism or comments as to whether or not how she is doing in this whole process. These were observation flights. And who is she observing? … The third time, they say, was this flight in which she did not act properly. Is there a disputed fact about those things? Yes, there is, Ron.

Oral argument — Roman Wroclawski v. Hillary Clinton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2012

Wreslowski in the period from April 28, 1993, to March 7, 1994, quote, acting in conditions of continual offense. That's on the excerpts of record, page 2057. … The continual offenses mean more than one count of an act during a period of time. Right. Correct. Like continuing on different times. Yes. Correct.

Oral argument — United States v. Doren Ward

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

Maybe you could start by just shedding that light that we're all looking for, that just here's the clean line that shows that this is on the side of variance as opposed to constructive amendment. … The judge instructs that you can – either Clean Air Act violation would amount to a – I'm sorry, either a violation of the work practice standard would be a Clean Air Act violation.

Oral argument — Our Children's Earth Foundation v. Regan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2025

Below the district court dismissed appellant's complaint for failure to comply with the Clean Water Act's pre-suit notice requirements. … It's a Clean Water Act case. The notice regulation I issued there required the notice to include dates of violation.