Documents

Oral argument — Global Equity Management (SA) v. Ebay Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

I just printed a clean one out for you. Okay. So the question is what conduct of Amazon with regard to the IPRs, not with regard to Texas or Virginia? Okay. … Period. This is our first opportunity to brief this new case law. Period. We did not have a chance to do it below, and we should have had on this record. Well, that's talking about the merits.

Oral argument — United States v. Ford Motor Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2007

The party stipulated that Ford essentially made a clean breast of its errors. It considered them clerical errors. It asked to have them corrected. Customs refused. … Within a two-year time period, they filed the act. Yes. That's an acceptance of the extension.

Oral argument — Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019

, that when your insulin is acidic, there's a higher tendency to have aggregation, and when your insulin is more monomeric, then you're also going to be having a higher It's in a glass vial with some air … Lantus was originally on the market in a formulation without a surfactant for some period of time. And that label acts as prior art here.

Oral argument — Bolanos-Reynoso v. Department of Agriculture

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025

Belanos-Reynoso alleged that she made protected disclosures based on violation of laws and regulations, the Anti-Deficiency Act specifically, and also USDA regulations. … Belanos-Reynoso's deficient performance during the performance improvement plan period, that 60-day period.

Oral argument — SportStar Athletics, Inc. v. Wilson Sporting Goods Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018

The stop limitation, the specification says it refers to stops, and then it says rivets act as stops, and in the claims, when you look at claim nine, it just has stops, and in claim 18, it has the stop … The word plugs, she just came up with out of thin air. That's not anywhere in the patent.

Oral argument — +Anderson Corp v. Fiber Composites

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2006

I'm not sure because I haven't gone back and looked at the time period over which they might have been using the repro. It might cover a different time. I just don't know the answer. … When they address that pelletizing comments, when they make pelletizing comments in that original set of prosecution history, they always refer to that globally.

Oral argument — JOSEPH T. GARGIULO v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2013

And so the remedy would be back pay for the three months between the two periods? Yeah, the remedy here would be back pay. … But a meaningful reply surely means something other than a reply to the janitor who cleans the building, right?

Oral argument — Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

That's merely telling you where, what acts of infringement or what acts by Erickson would or would not trigger this limitation on damages. … We don't take the position that it covers every LME product, period.

Oral argument — Wi-LAN USA, Inc. v. Ericsson, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

That's merely telling you where, what acts of infringement or what acts by Do you have any argument outside of Article 4 for contending that these patents were not subject to the most favored licensing … If it's true that the covenant not to sue covers every LME product period, then why do we have Section 4 and Section 7 at all? We don't take the position that it covers every LME product period.

Oral argument — TAHIR MAHMOOD v. RESEARCH IN MOTION

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2013

And one of the things courts look at when they're dealing with the application of latches is clean hands on the part of the party claiming latches, that is, in this case, the defendant. … In the but-for world, RIM would not have acted any differently if Mr. Mahmoud had filed suit earlier. Okay. All right. So let's say that that concludes the argument for the first case.

Oral argument — Global Equity Management (SA) v. Ebay Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

I just printed a clean one out for you. Okay. So the question is what conduct of Amazon with regard to the IPRs, not with regard to Texas or Virginia? Okay. … Period. This is our first opportunity to brief this new case law. Period. We did not have a chance to do it below, and we should have had on this record. Well, that's talking about the merits.

Oral argument — SRI International, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2021

It goes to the mental state of, in this case, Cisco at the time that it acted. And much of the same evidence overlaps. … In doing so, the district court on remand was not writing on a clean slate.

Oral argument — LEO MIKITAROFF v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2013

And that is the start of the period for which TDIU is denied. … They don't always begin with a clean slate. Very often, facts are presented to them because they've already been adjudicated or because the parties have stipulated to a certain slate of facts.

Oral argument — VIEGAS v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2012

When Congress rewrote 38 U.S.C. 1151 in 1996, the statute wasn't written on a clean slate and it wasn't written in a vacuum. … It's very nice that the Federal Tort Claims Act is available under certain circumstances. Mr. Villegas, as far as I am aware, he has not filed a Federal Tort Claims Act claim.

Oral argument — KELLOGG v. NIKE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2011

It had to be acted on by the court. The court granted our motion without any conditions. … This was an effort to streamline the presentation of our case, period.

Oral argument — Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. ALE USA Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2019

And before the dedication to the public, those two acts took place later. That's correct, Your Honor. … I mean, that was in the air. It could not possibly have not been in the air that those consequences would be.

Oral argument — Vandesande v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2019

I know, but in the contract, it says once they get it, they have to pay it, and they have to pay it within a certain period of time. … That they still had an obligation to, which they did, they were acting consistently with my interpretation of the contract.

Oral argument — WELLMAN INC v. EASTMAN CHEMICAL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2010

Well, Your Honor, the point here is you've got two clean admissions from Nichols. You've got admissions from other of the inventors. … They never used spinel, period. So to say that we were going to have to come away from the HUR being carbon black, Your Honor.

Oral argument — IN RE RIGGS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2011

You go up to the Board and it's all very clean. You file an appeal. They file an answer. You don't bring anything up new in your answer, so there's no cert reply and you lose when you come here. … Some of the supporting comments are different. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 12, second paragraph is verbatim the same as the rejection that was in the case before.

Oral argument — Schick v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2008

Well, the hearing is provided for in Section 641D of the Act. … In the event that they do produce it within the required time period, it will not be revoked. So you're saying that the language is and may thereafter be revoked is not really discretionary.