Documents

Brief in Opposition to Petition — Goldner v. Silver

Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition · 1965

Board of Public Education, School: District of Philadelphia, 357 U.S. 399, 78 S. Ct. 650........ 8 Boyd v. United States, 116 U-S. 616, 6 8. Ct. 524 .... 8 5 _ Bradley v. … Div. 826, 1 N.Y.S. 24 598; Matter of Marlow, ' 225 App. Div. 252, 232 N.Y. Supp. 578; In re Judicial In- quiry, supra.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Geraldine Tyler, Petitioner v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 6, 2023

Rep. 399, 400 (1781) (same). … Chester, 24 Eng. Rep. 967. 969 (1730).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jakari Alexander Lee, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 18, 2025

Id. at 24. … See Petition for Writ 25 of Certiorari at 22–24, Garland v.

Security Zones; Monterey Bay and Humboldt Bay, CA

Federal Register · Rule · Mar 29, 2004

L. 99-399), Congress amended section 7 of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA), 33 U.S.C. 1226, to allow the Coast Guard to take actions, including the establishment of security and safety zones, … As used in this section— Cruise ship means a passenger vessel, except for a ferry, over 100 feet in length, authorized to carry more than 12 passengers for hire; making voyages lasting more than 24

Petition — Segal v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

On July 24, 1982, Vivona was arrested by the New York City Police Department for the illegal possession of weapons in his home. … Green, 399 U.S. (1970) J.

Opposition Brief — Evans v. Connecticut

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

On April 24, 1985, the defendant filed a motion for a Bill of Particulars requesting, inter alia, that the state specify the date and time of the offen- ses charged. See Practice Book § 831. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 270 (1970); review cf the basis of the defendant's trial motions and the scope of the court's ruling is illuminating.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bogue Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Zeller

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Petitioners’ application for rehearing and application for rehearing in bane was denied by two orders dated April 24, 1973. … Beaman, 399 F.2d 884, 891 (1968). The out of pocket rule for buyers has also been approved in dicta in other cireuits (see, Janigan vy.

Amicus Curiae Brief On Behalf of the State of Texas — New Orleans Insurance Exchange v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief On Behalf of the State of Texas · 1957

TERM, 1957 > ~~ wr 3 7 No. 399 NEW ORLEANS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, pe 5 * a . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ret Ales. … State ex rel Attorney General, 86 Tex. 250, 24 S.W. 397, so held, and in 1903 amendatory legislation pro- vided for prosecution of anti-trust violations by in- a surance companies. Griffin v.

Opposition Brief — Snow v. Harnischfeger Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994

Federal Pacific Electric Co., 399 Mass. 687 SE Che SRG UNd OAEWS coud dawk aveabedies 6: bees 6 Fischer v. … Ed. 24 574 (1980). The district court dismissed Snow’s tort claim after a careful review of the affidavits and deposition testimony submitted.

Reply Brief — Bear Valley Church of Christ v. DeBose

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997

Rptr. 2d 399 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 1996).......... Sanders v. Casa View Baptist Church, 898 F. Supp. Le ee ren ve ee Swanson v. … Rptr. 2d 399 (Cal.

Petition — Kline v. Louisiana

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

(See ‘ranscript, Pages 24-25) At about 3:90 o'clock A.'1. on the morning of January 9, 1931, the defendant returned to “linnsboro in his emplover's transport truck and parkec it in the parking area … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, Ss. = . Vnis is not a case in which the auto- mobile exception applies in any sense of the word.

Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Callender v. New York

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1967

New York (No. 399, to be argued on April 12, 1967) ........... … New York (No. 399, to be argued on April 12, 1967).

Opposition — Sutherland Marine Co. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

Harralson, 399 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir. 1968); See also Sigma Chi Fraternity v. Regents of the University of Colorado, 258 F. Supp. 515, 526-27 (D. Colo. 1966). Cf. … In connection with the effect of the sealed bid procedure upon the estate, it should be noted that the Penn Central reorgani- zation is rapidly drawing to a close; the Court has fixed October 24, 1978

Opposition — Azhocar v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

Petitioner argues (Pet. 19-20) that the activities outlined above were innocent in themselves and that the agents’ actions were premised ‘‘on mere suspicion and hunch” (Pet. 24). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970). See United States v.

Opposition — Caterine v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976

Green, 399 U.S. 149 oo... cccceeeeeee 8 Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 1.0.0.0... 7 Government of the Virgin Islands v. … Petitioners finally contend (No. 75-5678 Pet. 24-26) that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing them to imprisonment while Henderson and Davis received probation and fines after pleading

Opposition — First National Bank of Tekamah v. Hansen

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Adamski, 77 F. 2d 397, 399 (D.C. Cir. 1985) 9 First National Bank of Tekamah v. Hansen, 702 F. 2d 728 (8th Cir. 1983) Hull v. Burr, 234 0.5. Viz, 720-22 (1914) —________. … Adamski, 77 F.2d 397, 399 (D.C. Cir. 1935). Additionally, this Court has historically recognized that federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.

Opposition — International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Great Coastal Express, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Computing Scale ny, 261 U.S. 399, 43 S.Ct. 458, 67 L.Ed. 719 (1922) - 25 Rules of Court: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60(b) - 25,28 ii. … proferred any defense to liability" which the false evidence on the violence cause of action "precluded" the Union "from asserting" - and the Court concludes that "relief was properly denied on this 24

Opposition — Kaiser v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983

Sedley, 399 F.2d 769 (6th Cir. 1968)............. Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 406 U.S. 320 (1972)........ Baldwin v. … Sedley, 399 F.2d 769 (6th Cir. 1968); Acree v. Air Line Pilots Association, 390 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 (1968); Cream Top Creamery v.

Supplemental Brief — Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Dec 20, 2019

Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .......................................... 9–10 Diamond v. … Vanda’s claims call for administering a prior art drug for a prior art purpose, and they cover any dosage “of 12 mg/day or less”—i.e., every possible reduction from the prior art dosage of 12–24 mg/day

Petitioner for ReHearing — Miller v. Commissioner (No. 675)

Supreme Court brief · Petitioner for ReHearing · 1957

Commissioner, 227 F. 2d 399 ................ . SOMOS FREE ITRtO8, OO Ue sid ojeiscodanieansian. | Lilly v. Haynes Co-op. Coal Mining Co., 00) N.D. … United States, 96 1S. 24. “ Lilly ve Haynes Co-op. Coal Mining Co., 54 ND. 4695, 196 NW. 556. “: Ff 7 7 ? tine @ HMECLESUUC NV. LLC, LU A “OEE. dd-te Lede cktd. S81. Mumaw vy.