Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
(See ‘ranscript, Pages 24-25) At about 3:90 o'clock A.'1. on the morning of January 9, 1931, the defendant returned to “linnsboro in his emplover's transport truck and parkec it in the parking area … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, Ss. = . Vnis is not a case in which the auto- mobile exception applies in any sense of the word.
461 U.S. 906Opposition — First National Bank of Tekamah v. Hansen
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Adamski, 77 F. 2d 397, 399 (D.C. Cir. 1985) 9 First National Bank of Tekamah v. Hansen, 702 F. 2d 728 (8th Cir. 1983) Hull v. Burr, 234 0.5. Viz, 720-22 (1914) —________. … Adamski, 77 F.2d 397, 399 (D.C. Cir. 1935). Additionally, this Court has historically recognized that federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.
463 U.S. 1208Opposition — International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Great Coastal Express, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Computing Scale ny, 261 U.S. 399, 43 S.Ct. 458, 67 L.Ed. 719 (1922) - 25 Rules of Court: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60(b) - 25,28 ii. … proferred any defense to liability" which the false evidence on the violence cause of action "precluded" the Union "from asserting" - and the Court concludes that "relief was properly denied on this 24
459 U.S. 1128Opposition — Kaiser v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Sedley, 399 F.2d 769 (6th Cir. 1968)............. Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 406 U.S. 320 (1972)........ Baldwin v. … Sedley, 399 F.2d 769 (6th Cir. 1968); Acree v. Air Line Pilots Association, 390 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 852 (1968); Cream Top Creamery v.
461 U.S. 943Opposition — Azhocar v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Petitioner argues (Pet. 19-20) that the activities outlined above were innocent in themselves and that the agents’ actions were premised ‘‘on mere suspicion and hunch” (Pet. 24). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970). See United States v.
440 U.S. 907Opposition — Sutherland Marine Co. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
Harralson, 399 F.2d 35, 39 (5th Cir. 1968); See also Sigma Chi Fraternity v. Regents of the University of Colorado, 258 F. Supp. 515, 526-27 (D. Colo. 1966). Cf. … In connection with the effect of the sealed bid procedure upon the estate, it should be noted that the Penn Central reorgani- zation is rapidly drawing to a close; the Court has fixed October 24, 1978
439 U.S. 895Petition — Segal v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
On July 24, 1982, Vivona was arrested by the New York City Police Department for the illegal possession of weapons in his home. … Green, 399 U.S. (1970) J.
467 U.S. 1216Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Callender v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1967
New York (No. 399, to be argued on April 12, 1967) ........... … New York (No. 399, to be argued on April 12, 1967).
386 U.S. 779Opposition — Caterine v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
Green, 399 U.S. 149 oo... cccceeeeeee 8 Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 1.0.0.0... 7 Government of the Virgin Islands v. … Petitioners finally contend (No. 75-5678 Pet. 24-26) that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing them to imprisonment while Henderson and Davis received probation and fines after pleading
424 U.S. 909Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief On Behalf of the State of Texas · 1957
TERM, 1957 > ~~ wr 3 7 No. 399 NEW ORLEANS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, pe 5 * a . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ret Ales. … State ex rel Attorney General, 86 Tex. 250, 24 S.W. 397, so held, and in 1903 amendatory legislation pro- vided for prosecution of anti-trust violations by in- a surance companies. Griffin v.
355 U.S. 22Opposition Brief — Snow v. Harnischfeger Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
Federal Pacific Electric Co., 399 Mass. 687 SE Che SRG UNd OAEWS coud dawk aveabedies 6: bees 6 Fischer v. … Ed. 24 574 (1980). The district court dismissed Snow’s tort claim after a careful review of the affidavits and deposition testimony submitted.
513 U.S. 808Reply Brief — Bear Valley Church of Christ v. DeBose
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1997
Rptr. 2d 399 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 1996).......... Sanders v. Casa View Baptist Church, 898 F. Supp. Le ee ren ve ee Swanson v. … Rptr. 2d 399 (Cal.
520 U.S. 1248Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bogue Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Zeller
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Petitioners’ application for rehearing and application for rehearing in bane was denied by two orders dated April 24, 1973. … Beaman, 399 F.2d 884, 891 (1968). The out of pocket rule for buyers has also been approved in dicta in other cireuits (see, Janigan vy.
414 U.S. 908Opposition Brief — Evans v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
On April 24, 1985, the defendant filed a motion for a Bill of Particulars requesting, inter alia, that the state specify the date and time of the offen- ses charged. See Practice Book § 831. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 270 (1970); review cf the basis of the defendant's trial motions and the scope of the court's ruling is illuminating.
485 U.S. 988Reply Brief — RH Capital Associates LLC v. Mayer Brown LLP
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2011
Bridgestone Corp., 399 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005) ................ 4 Foman v. … Pet. 24.
564 U.S. 1018Petition for Rehearing — Brocail v. Detroit Tigers, Inc. (No. 09-72)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 2009
Norge Diviston of Magic Chef, Ine. 486 U.S. 399 (1988) . 4,6, 8, 13, Livadas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107 (1994) Loewen Group Intl v. … Littig., 251 F.Supp.24 Ti (19.1.0. ZOO) oo. cccccsescssccsseet Voilas v. General Motors Corp., 170 F.3d 367 (3d Cir. 1999). Williams v. NFL, I3d ; 2901928 (8th Cir. Sept. 11, 2009)..
Petitioner for ReHearing — Miller v. Commissioner (No. 675)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioner for ReHearing · 1957
Commissioner, 227 F. 2d 399 ................ . SOMOS FREE ITRtO8, OO Ue sid ojeiscodanieansian. | Lilly v. Haynes Co-op. Coal Mining Co., 00) N.D. … United States, 96 1S. 24. “ Lilly ve Haynes Co-op. Coal Mining Co., 54 ND. 4695, 196 NW. 556. “: Ff 7 7 ? tine @ HMECLESUUC NV. LLC, LU A “OEE. dd-te Lede cktd. S81. Mumaw vy.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Dec 20, 2019
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .......................................... 9–10 Diamond v. … Vanda’s claims call for administering a prior art drug for a prior art purpose, and they cover any dosage “of 12 mg/day or less”—i.e., every possible reduction from the prior art dosage of 12–24 mg/day
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Karen Mackey, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 13, 2018
On July 18, 2017, Mackey was sentenced to 24 months imprisonment, three years of supervised release and other conditions. ROA.307312. … ROA.399 (witness examination). (4) "It's also a silver sedan with a female driver."
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 23, 2018
Rev. 399 (2008) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Michael W. McConnell & Luke W. Goodrich, On Resolving Church Property Disputes, 58 Ariz. L. … See Pet. 21–24. Respondent’s own authorities acknowledge that the lower courts are divided. See, e.g., Church of God in Christ, Inc. v. L.M.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.