Documents

Oral argument — Pearce v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023

Have you made both arguments as to an FMLA violation as to both of those periods, the pre-April transition and the post-June return? No. … also important to understand her underlying argument regarding the settlement ultimatum, which she argues on its face said that you're not allowed to go to OSC or these offers are off the table of a clean

Oral argument — Eisai Co v. Dr Reddy's

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2008

And that's where anyone would start in the relevant time period to start their pathway to the claimed compound. … Examiner Fan and Crawford have this debate at the interview, which Examiner Fan records, and they agree that Final comments here, Mr. O'Malley?

Oral argument — USVALDO TRUJILLO v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2013

This was an intentional and a deceptive act. Moreover, it was serious in that it involved forcification, which called into question Mr. Trujillo's trustworthiness. … Not only a supervisor, but he was the director of air operations of this base.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017

And so laying the factual framework that Your Honor asked for, these IPRs didn't come out of thin air. … The page that you had pointed to, Judge Moore, APP Act 6394. Okay, I'm there.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017

And so laying the factual framework that Your Honor asked for, these IPRs didn't come out of thin air. … The page that you had pointed to, Judge Moore, APP Act 6394. Okay, I'm there.

Oral argument — Dorbest Limited v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2010

It's not that commerce has simply thrown C4 in the air. It's just that it's constructing it in a different method. … Why shouldn't you be held to make a clean choice? No, I understand your point, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Dishart v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2009

This gentleman had this duty put upon him by the Air Force. It was an order from his commanding officer. … That was the period to which my question was directed. There's no question that this exceeded the statutory amount.

Oral argument — Smith v. GSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019

Smith absent is protected activity under the whistleblower protection act. … It's an ADA argument, I assume, Anti-Deficiency Act. Well, as I understand it, government employees are not supposed to work off the clock, period. Even if they want to donate their time, yeah.

Oral argument — United States v. Nitek Electronics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

DOJ just can't pluck something out of the air. But there is no administrative exhaustion requirement under section 592. It requires customs to take certain actions, which it did here. … Your Honor, I do want to start with a few comments about things that have been said by the Department of Justice here.

Oral argument — Sanders v. Iancu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2019

The air that we believe occurred in the below court was twofold. … And so as far as the actual applicant, she acted with diligence in this case.

Oral argument — GIRARD CHAMNESS v. JOHN MCHUGH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2013

Would the military give him his back pay for that period? That's an interesting question. It's a good question. I don't know the answer to it from that standpoint. … The court didn't cite Little Tucker Act jurisdiction.

Oral argument — In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2014

The reasonable likelihood of prevailing decision, that decision alone becomes washed clean at the final written decision. … Do you want to comment on the broadest reasonable interpretation issue or the other issues raised by Mr. Sandlin? Yeah, of course.

Oral argument — Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017

And so laying the factual framework that Your Honor asked for, these IPRs didn't come out of thin air. … The page that you had pointed to, Judge Moore, APP Act 6394. Okay, I'm there.

Oral argument — DeNofrio v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

Struthers to continue to act as a physician. In, in addition to that, Mr. … And that is that we had three management people, after my client became a whistleblower, make comments that were very, very similar. And that is Mr.

Oral argument — POSCO v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019

In this case, we put on the record the system marginal price, the marginal price, the variable cost of electricity that's on KPX's schedule for the period of review. … This is for the period that's under review? Correct, Your Honor. Correct, Your Honor. In fact, well, I can direct Your Honor to the actual appendix site where you can find it.

Oral argument — VOORHIS v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2012

But in that situation, at least my reading of the statute, the right of the period. Even if they're breaking the law and doing so? … a Hatch Act violation it is.

Oral argument — Globe Savings Bank v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2006

Otherwise, you'd been stuck with $7 million, period. … It exceeded plan for every period, every reporting period, after the contract was executed. Okay.

Oral argument — Arlton v. Aerovironment, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025

It's also the burden and expense of litigation, the very burden and expense that Air Department's had its shoulder here. … The complaint refers to what NASA did, what JPL did, in conjunction with Air Department.

Oral argument — TKC AEROSPACE, INC v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2013

Does the clock tick on the 5% for that period that it's in the repair shop? … It says, some of the duties performed by Air Station Washington maintenance personnel include corrosion control. Well, what that's referring to in the... There's two 5.7.1.2.

Oral argument — Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

That's merely telling you where, what acts of infringement or what acts by Erickson would or would not trigger this limitation on damages. … We don't take the position that it covers every LME product, period.