Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Moore v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
Moore, 5 Cir. (1970), _ 427 F. 24 38. … United States, 399 F.2d 642 (Sth Cir. 1968).
400 U.S. 965Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Motto v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969
Supp. 24. It is, reprinted as Appendix B (pp. 57a-69a) of the petition in No. 578; portions of it are repri ted as. … Code of Crimi- nal Procedure, § 399; People v. O’Farrell, 175 N.Y. 823, 67 N.E. 588 (1903) ; People v. Negrin, 24 Mise. 2d 181, 301_N.Y.S. 2d 59 (1960).
396 U.S. 963Opposition Brief — Matthew Clark, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 6, 2025
See Pet. 22-24 (citation omitted). But that is not an argument that the statute is “void for vagueness,” for preservation purposes. See Plea Agreement 1-2. … See Pet. 24 (arguing that the case should be remanded to the court of appeals for a further explanation for rejecting petitioner’s claim).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patrick Cook, et al., Petitioners v. Melissa Mays, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 13, 2018
Laws § 325.1003 .................................. 10 Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, Act 399 of 1976 .............................................................6 Removal Clarification Act of 2011, … The EPA granted Michigan primary enforcement authority following the enactment of the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, Act 399 of 1976 (Act 399).
Petitioners Brief — Patch v. Solar Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1945
S. 24; Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co., 256 U. S. 619; Columbus Railway & Power Company v. Columbus, 249 U. S. 399. 3. … S. 24; Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co., 256 U. S. 619; Columbus Railway & Power Com- pany v. Columbus, 249 U. S. 399.
326 U.S. 741Agency decision · Agency decision
NLRB, 640 F.2d 392, 399 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (enforcing a Board order for local publication of notice). … Executed at Alameda, California, on Karts tea Karen Scott June 24, 2010.
National Labor Relations BoardOpposition Brief — Tison v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
While it was Gary Tison wh suggested that course of action, everyone else agreed with the plan. (1d, at 24-25.) … State, 399 Sc.2d 1362, 1370 (Fla. 20 | 1961).
481 U.S. 137Opposition Brief — Technograph, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399 (1923), is to the same effect. … Petition pp. 21-24. CONCLUSION The petition should be denied. Respectfully submitted, ARTHUR G. CONNOLLY ARTHUR G.
474 U.S. 819Reply Brief — Yee v. Escondido
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992
Brief for Respondent at 24. In other words, they buy the rights created by the Ordinance. ! … December 24, 1991); Yee v.
503 U.S. 519Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James Phillips, Petitioner v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 20, 2017
Enis, 194 111. 2d 361, 399-400 (2001). … Very truly yours, Clerk of the Supreme Court 24
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Steven Vicario, Petitioner v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 24, 2026
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 6 (1970), quoting 5 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 1367, p. 29 (3d ed.1940). Two distinct lines of confrontation authority have emerged. … Roberts, 118 Ohio St.3d 236 ¶ 136 (2025), citing Chapman, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Maine v. Moulton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Quarles, No. 82-1213 (June 12, 1984)... 19, 24 Nix v. Williams, No. 82-1651 (June 11, 1984) ......6, 13, 14, 16, 17, 20, 29 Powell v. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) (preliminary hearing) ; White v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 59 (1963) (guilty plea at preliminary hearing).
474 U.S. 159Amicus Curiae Brief — Walton v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Battiste, 24 F.Cas. 1042 (C.C.D. a ee ee 6 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) ................ 4 Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241 (1949)............ 13 Woodson v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 86-87 (1970); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. at 151-154.
497 U.S. 639Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mark Norris, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 2, 2020
Code Ann. § 39-14-402……………………………….………5, 21-22, 24, 25 vii Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-403…………………………..…...……………….4, 5, 22 Tex. … Ct. 399; and Quarles v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 1872 (2019), and the cases they rely upon. Rules of the Supreme Court 10(c).
Opposition Brief — Ross v. Reda
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1975
George, 399 US 224, 229 (1970) Nelson v. Moore, 470 F 2d 1192 (1st Cir 1972) Parker v, Parker, 97 So. 2d 136 (DCt set Fla. 1957) People of the State of New York v. … See Darr v Burford, supra, at 203, 94 L Ed at 766; Davis v Burke, 179 US 399, 401-403, 45 L Ed 249, 250, 251. 21S Ct 210 (1900).
423 U.S. 892Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n of Broadcasters v. Quincy Cable TV, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Sept. 24, 1985)......... Black Hills Video Corp. v. FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. sb ..) PP Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp, __— U.S. S. … Sept. 24, 1985).
476 U.S. 1169Memorandum — Kenney v. Wabash Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1953
Heth (1806) 3 Cranch, 399, 413, 2 Pe ee een ur re eee 14 U. S. v. Hughes, D.C., N.Y. (1875) 8 Ben. 29, 26 Fed. … E. 2d 713, 311 Mass. 185; Mulligan vr, Hilton (1940) 24 N. E. 2d 676, 679, 133 A. L. R. 376: Duff +. Black Diamond Collieries (1930) 33 S. W. 24 63, 161 Tenn. 486; Carder Realty Corporation 1.
344 U.S. 913Opposition Brief — Louis v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Gov't Br. 3 n.2, 24-26. … Mitchell, 303 U.S. at 399.
528 U.S. 1115Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall Mathena, Warden, Petitioner v. Lee Boyd Malvo
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 18, 2019
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989) .............................. 17, 24 United States v. … Ct. 399, 407 (2018) (“[W]e are a court of review, not of first view.”)
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Tilney v. Chicago
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1943
Holten, 304 Ill. 394, 399................. 23-24 Price v. City of Mattoon, 364 Ill. 512, 515......... 12-13 Root v. City of Saratoga Springs, 218 N. Y. … Holten, 304 Ill. 394, 399. Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp., 201 Fed. 762, 769. Blacker v. Kitchen Brothers Hotel Company, 133 Neb. 66, 273 N. W. 838.
320 U.S. 759
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.