Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.06s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 22, 2006
Quality Standards and all other requirements of the Clean Air Act for redesignation to attainment are met. … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
71 FR 14438Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 28, 2001
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (“the Act”). … DATES: Comments on the proposed update must be received on or before July 30, 2001. ADDRESSES: Comments must be mailed (in duplicate if possible) to: EPA Air Docket (Air-4), Attn: Docket No.
66 FR 34394Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 29, 2000
We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate this emission source under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
65 FR 52391Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 21, 2000
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
65 FR 45335Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 21, 2016
We are proposing to approve the rescission of rules under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by August 22, 2016. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
81 FR 47324Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 26, 1999
EPA is proposing approval of this revision to be incorporated into the California SIP for the attainment of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone under title I of the Clean Air Act … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
64 FR 14665Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 7, 2008
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 8, 2008. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 45925Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Kansas City, Missouri Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 23, 2020
The majority of the state is subject to the Clean Air Act (CAA) nine pounds per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure from June 1 to September 15. … If approved the Kansas City, Missouri area would be subject to the Clean Air Act Reid Vapor Pressure requirement.
85 FR 83877Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 12, 1996
These revisions involve changes to Chapter 335-3-14--Air Permits, and were made to comply with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
61 FR 5358Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 17, 2007
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
72 FR 46188Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 18, 1998
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on the rule. Any parties interested in commenting on the rule should do so at this time.
63 FR 44213Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 12, 2020
If comments are received within the 30-day comment period on this document, the EPA will evaluate and respond appropriately to the comments before making a final decision to delete the 117 residential … This air monitoring routinely measured ambient air lead concentrations in excess of the ambient air standard.
85 FR 27979Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 19, 2009
Section 612 Statutory and Regulatory Background Section 612 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to develop a program for evaluating alternatives to ozone-depleting substances. … Air Act.
74 FR 53445Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 16, 2002
We are proposing to approve the local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. … Anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time, we do not plan to open a second comment period. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
67 FR 46618Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 11, 2008
On February 17, 2004, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) submitted to EPA an administrative petition asking us to reconsider several aspects of the 2003 Mercury Cell MACT under Clean Air Act … First, NRDC states that EPA failed to adequately justify that a numeric emission limitation was not feasible per the criteria prescribed in section 112(h) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
73 FR 33258Environmental Protection AgencyChronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 3, 1998
DATES: The comment period for this proposed rule will end on March 9, 1999. … Compressed-air or dry methods shall not be used for such cleaning.
63 FR 66940Energy DepartmentApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan; PSD Regulations
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 27, 2010
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve revisions to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
75 FR 59179Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 8, 2020
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a New Mexico State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the repeal … Clean Air Act Section 110(l) Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) provides that “. . .
85 FR 40951Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 29, 2003
The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). D. … Air Act.
68 FR 55920Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 14, 2003
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
68 FR 64576Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.