Documents

Oral argument — Colacicco v. Apotex

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009

This was not subject to notice and comment. … At the time that that regulation was put forth and the amendments recommended, that was in 1989, it was a comment period.

Oral argument — In Re Penn East Pipeline Co LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2019

Except there had been no doubt prior to that period because under the Federal Power Act and under the Natural Gas Act, state properties had been being condemned. … But their assertion is you get no traction from the Federal Power Act and the Amtrak Act because that existed in a period of time between Supreme Court authority that may have cast doubt on the ability

Oral argument — 22-2368_USA v. Perrin_Montgomery

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2024

It does not contradict the Pennsylvania wire tap act. … Unless the panel has any, that wasn't a question, more of a comment than a question. Uh, I, we would ask the court to affirm. Thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — 22-2262_Utility Workers United Assn v. Utility Workers Union America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2023

We calculated—they arbitrated a couple of cases in that period of time. … Well, they were a component of a larger pie, but for instance, and I'm just pulling numbers out of the air.

Oral argument — Wilson v. Cityof PA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

In that case, the plaintiff's lawyer made representations repeatedly to the client and to the court that there were various cleanings that would be filed. It wasn't done. … Could you comment on the propriety of that dismissal? Yes. Your Honor commented about the Poulos factors.

Oral argument — Cantonv.KMARTCorp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

You were not, you were precluded because you never got to the jury, period. Yes, sir, I'm sorry, yes. So on constructive notice, I just have one question. I don't know whether this is in the record. … excuse me, granting summary judgment to . . . but in this case, it essentially said that, following Huey, that it's important to know who the employer is and whether or not, therefore, this person was acting

Oral argument — United States v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2010

If a period of home detention is chosen, an equal period of imprisonment must be rejected inasmuch as we're at the statutory maximum for the combined terms. … With a spa and air conditioning. You know, because I just think, you know, I just think I want to do this. But I don't really believe that you need to be confined.

Oral argument — United States v. Reynolds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2009

with the notice and comment requirement in the 30-day waiting period that rule was issued on february 28th 2007 and as I mentioned this is precisely what the sixth circuit recently found in united states … was violated because the attorney general did not show good cause to waive the notice and comment period or the 30-day waiting period in enacting the interim rule the interim rule central to mr.

Oral argument — Pickel v. Lancaster County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2021

You've got to act now. … They were in loco parentis for a period of time. We could have discussions about what period of time, from January of 14 to sometime in 15. It's unimportant.

Oral argument — In Re Wells Fargo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2019

They came over a period of time for no money, the so-called zero purchase price repo. So they were bundled with other securities where there was a lot of compensation. … You can't just pull a number out of thin air and say that's our value. If you can't explain how you came up with it, that is by definition arbitrary. What were their alternatives?

Oral argument — Dewey v. Volkswagen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2012

I understand that, and I appreciate that comment, that I think that really the concern of the objectors is the valuation, not the question of value. You didn't have that option in those cases. … But it does say very clearly, if an act of Congress covers the area, that's the first place you look. And the Rules Enabling Act put the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in place for this purpose.

Oral argument — United States v. Chance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

But to the extent that you you worry about relying on our comments and our argument about the plain Jane vehicle, the new license plate. … And right from the start of the stop, he acted very much like he had something to hide.

Oral argument — Sullivan v. DBInvestments Inc enbanc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 24, 2011

Now, this whole Illinois BRIC question, I think if you look at it from a state-by-state basis, is very much up in the air. … Don't bring it here, period. Go away. Assume that happened. You had law just that clear.

Oral argument — 21-3363Jaswinder SinghJames Calabreseetal. v. Uber Technologies,INC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

So it's on Uber to prove the act applies to the people they want to solve it on. … Vangelis' argument, which is no matter how you slice it, this is 2% of trips, period. You're done.

Oral argument — Berkley Specialty Ins v. Masterforce Construction Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2022

Comments in those cases and said. That the natural foreseeable acts such as rainfall. Which tend to exacerbate the damage effect or consequences. Cause ab initio by faulty workmanship. … That would be awardable under the telephone consumer protection act. That act provides for trouble damages and attorney's fees.

Oral argument — William R.Jones v. Mark Capozza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2019

So duration of the statutory prohibition, exhaustion was from the period of the event. … And the second piece is just that district courts deal with these cases as a screening stage under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Pennycooke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2025

And here, when you look at the judge's comments, it doesn't appear that he's talking at all about punishment for the original offense, which is what Esteros prohibits. … Petticoat's violations, but he said the sentence is also to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment, period.

Oral argument — USAv.Cunningham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2012

Period. I mean it's a condition, it may not be enforceable to a large extent outside of the home. And how can we possibly know what the state of communication arc is going to be 20 years from now? … Let's talk about harmless air for a second.

Oral argument — Cooper v. Samsung

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2009

Okay, now we can go back to the Consumer Fraud Act. … Without knowing what particular case it was, I wouldn't be able to comment. I don't believe it was a 1080p television case.

Oral argument — Accurso v. Infra Red Services Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2019

First of all, my clients aren't the one that acted willfully and maliciously. My clients aren't the one that stole business. … So the notion that they acted badly is wrong.