Documents

Oral argument — Renee J. v. Houston Indep School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2018

But the period of time that he was out of school, that was the period of time where the parents did get in touch with legal counsel and the student did eventually return to school with the guidance of … If I may respond to Judge Southwick's comment about more than, merely more than de minimis from the Michael F. standard.

Oral argument — Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Administrative Revie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2015

He can always bid for more flights, but would not be paid for that period of time because he did not attend the meeting. So that's in the record. … The comments you heard about pressure pack situation and pushing him to take a plane, that wasn't the point. These pilots know you... Let's put it this way.

Oral argument — Henry Luwisch v. American Marine Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

Well, Lewitsch was in charge, and the coffee was on the deck, and he had to clean it up before he could put it back. … Lewitsch acted like he was sorry to go. But he wanted to do other things, and he did. And that, to me, is a bright line.

Oral argument — United States v. Anderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2023

In this case, the previous case, during a period of time where Mr. … It's like he's going to act as someone who's innocent of a crime. He's not representing him. He's prosecuting him.

Oral argument — SCD BLK 251 Houston v. Mt. Jefferson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2022

What's— Well, Your Honor, this Court has said that the Declaratory Judgment Act and declaratory relief generally is a way for parties to solve disputes efficiently. … It grants the Block 251 owner, appellant, the future right to connect an air bridge or tunnel connection to a point on the wall of the improvements.

Oral argument — Earl Adams, Jr. v. Chevron USA, Incorporate

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2016

But finally, to respond to that, if we look to fundamentally just the statute itself, well, not the statute but the act, Section 9 of CAFA states the amendments made by this act shall apply. … So broad doesn't apply, therefore we stop, period. You can. You can get off there. You can stop there. And then if you keep going, do you relation back from other circuits?

Oral argument — Yolande Burst v. Shell Oil Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2016

During the relevant time period, which I know was many decades ago, what was the benzene level in your client's gasoline? … I think there was some testimony generally in that period of time. It could be 4% to 5%.

Oral argument — Josette Ripoll v. Patrick Dobard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

Ripoll said, I believe I've been discriminated against because of my age, 61 years, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended. … Brown's comment. There also was no mention whatsoever of Ms. Brown's alleged comment in the original petition.

Oral argument — Burleson v. Collin Cty Cmty Coll Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2021

Jackson Public School District, which says the loss of First Amendment freedoms, even for minimal periods, constitutes irreparable injury. Or R.A.V. v. City of St. … And so those reasons are all independent of the trial court's stated reasons, and this court, if it were to decide to find the court aired on 1983, should affirm the summary judgment motion for any one

Oral argument — United States v. David Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2020

simply and otherwise the judge, the court has made a comment on the ultimate finding a fact for counts two and three. … His conviction for armed bank robbery was overturned, but it was because he never used he never there was never an act of intimidation. He never tried to intimidate anybody in the bank.

Oral argument — Rogers v. Espinoza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2026

The clean-up hitter, you called him. That's right. Bring in the big guns. Thank you, Your Honors. May it please the court. This is a picture of the client. … The question here becomes how quickly must the officer act to remove her from the ant bites from the time that he found out? And here we're talking about a very quick term, period of time.

Oral argument — Van Winkle v. Rogers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2023

And that was a deliberate act. They didn't accidentally. They sent those tire fragments there. They didn't just lose them. … I mean the judge was acting according to his inherent authority. There's no cause of action in Louisiana for spoliation.

Oral argument — Midship Pipeline v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2022

If we were to conclude that we lack jurisdiction, so we just dismissed that we didn't comment on anything else. … We just do what they say, period, but forget cost. Well, they have an obligation too, that has to be accommodated to reasonable.

Oral argument — United States v. Alberto Paz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2015

That's the reason the protect act gave that's the reason congress gave for switching it over. … Comment 1 helps us understand that. But go ahead. Finish out what you have to say. Thank you.

Oral argument — Robert Collier v. Dallas County Hospital Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

I mean, you know, with verbal comments or oral comments, it's pretty clear how many times a person says it. … So once a week when he was assigned to Pod C for a six-month period is when he would go into this room that held the swastikas. And that testimony is in the record.

Oral argument — Randall Little v. Royal Dutch Shell, P.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

I'm Sean Connolly, together with co-counsel Michael Porter and Dick LaFond, representing the plaintiffs' relators in this False Claims Act case. … The district court made comments originally saying you have no cases, no false claims. See, we didn't find that enough then. No, you didn't.

Oral argument — Joanna Wilson v. Navika Capital Group, L.L.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2016

No, I don't believe so because those were put in for the PACER, and what that goes to were the representations made to her that plaintiffs were acting dutifully. … What I mean by that is, look, they can't now go justify all the acts. For instance ---- They're confined to the record. They're confined to the record.

Oral argument — Bodin v. New Orleans

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2026

New Orleans has affected a taking by prohibiting the appellant homeowners from renting their homes for any period less than 30 days and violated section 230 of the Communications Decency Act by impermissibly … And it particularly does it in ways that I think implicate Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Bedoy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2016

It said, Some are phrases showing that the act must have relationship, time, logic, and so forth. … I'd like to begin just briefly by responding to a couple of comments from Mr. Bedoy's reply brief.

Oral argument — Wanda Williams v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

What is the three-minute period we're talking about? … The Act defines an adequate warning, so one can assume if it's a no warning case, what you put in there has to meet the Act in defense of being an adequate warning.