Documents

Oral argument — Pennzoil-Quaker State v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2007

The taxpayer said, well, in that case, what happened is the taxpayer paid costs in the current years to clean up past contamination, and it was the same theory. … Number two has to do, I think you can categorize it as nexus, and that is in Reynolds in the earlier period, Reynolds didn't have any relationship with its payees in the later period.

Oral argument — Mote v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2020

Mote is the surviving spouse of Wayne Mote, a Vietnam veteran who served his country in the Air Force. It has been nearly 10 years since Mr. … So I guess I'd just like you to comment on that. I mean, that makes it a little difficult.

Oral argument — Copan Italia Spa v. Puritan Medical Products Company LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2023

And thus the Air Force was designated for the purpose of contracting. And the Air Force had agreed that these were covered countermeasures in the contract itself. So there is a record here. … The Air Force contract recognizes... So that's asking us to sit as fact finders.

Oral argument — BASF AGRO v. CIPLA LIMITED

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

Moreover, all of the acts in which CIPLA was engaged in this case all took place in India. Okay? … Lombardi's comment about TiVo. As the court, I think, can appreciate, having dealt with the issues in this case, TiVo does obviously not involve a default judgment.

Oral argument — Bannum, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2015

It's what you're saying that the agency looks back and sees the horizon here and they say this BANNM character can't get his act together. He couldn't get his act together in Act 1 of the play. … We gave him Act 2. He can't get his act together in Act 2. Correct.

Oral argument — In Re Roth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2014

The operating period is a period sufficient to raise the pH at the surface of the meat product to a desired level, at the surface to a desired level. … He says, for example, on column 2, A109, column 2, starting about line 11, he says, quote, the operating period is a period sufficient to raise the pH at the surface of the meat product to a desired level

Oral argument — Dobyns v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2024

The court noted that Plaintiff intended to file an application for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. … I'll clean up some issues that the Court asked about.

Oral argument — Celanese International Corporation v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2024

And the question this Court asks is, what does the language of the America Invents Act say? And if the language of the America Invents Act is clear, then the Court needs to go no farther. … There are arguments made about Section 102A and 102B, where 102B is the grace period.

Oral argument — In Re Medicis Pharmaceutical

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2009

And all three of those are more or less common issues in the art that's involved in skin treatment and cleaning. Is that your argument? In essence, yes, Your Honor. … I suggest what it comes down to, there's nothing other than the examiner's assumption, when you see maximum penetration, to mean that will act very quickly, put on the skin, wash it off.

Oral argument — Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2022

It requires that everything be taken care of, except for acting on the judgment. … The court says at page 1378, and this is in regard to the summary judgment argument, I'll clean up quickly.

Oral argument — +Third Wave Tech v. Stratagene

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

Indeed, it was TWT's witness who told the jury that an injunction was issued, and the damage period, therefore, was only 18 months. … For quite a short period of time. Let me address first the concept of up-front payment.

Oral argument — System Fuels, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

Then I withdraw that comment. But you know what, since you've offered, any objection, anybody to consolidating it? I couldn't see why it wasn't. Okay, very good. Then it's consolidated. … This is the one that pertains to the past six-year period. That is also correct, Your Honor.

Oral argument — System Fuels, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

Then I withdraw that comment. But you know what, since you've offered, any objection, anybody to consolidating it? I couldn't see why it wasn't. Okay, very good. Then it's consolidated. … This is the one that pertains to the past six-year period. That is also correct, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Arctic Slope Native Assoc v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2009

Congress was entitled to assume that it meant that period and no more. … The Fair Labor Standards Act, the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, both of those acts say, no, we're not going to do Rule 23 class actions in the usual way.

Oral argument — Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2015

So let's talk about the two categories of acts that we've discussed earlier. … It's to clear the air of a wrongful allegation of infringement. I don't know how you can clear the air of a wrongful allegation of infringement if there's never been one made.

Oral argument — EIS GmbH v. Novoluto GmbH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2023

the prior art disclosed, taught, or suggested the claimed limitations, including the limitation requiring that there be modulated positive and negative pressures with respect to the ambient pressure acting … Bonsall, you have some final comments. Thank you, Your Honors. So, Judge Prost, I think you asked me earlier about the citation. It's Appendix 864.

Oral argument — Aviation Capital Partners, LLC v. SH Advisors, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2025

If you get the data from the air traffic control, you get the data from this new transponder, and then you figure out the tax laws and all the jurisdictions, you can do this by pen and paper. … Is this just figuring out where the airport is at different periods of time because different states have different tax laws regarding aircraft?

Oral argument — Insulet Corp. v. EOFlow, Co. Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2026

Counsel, could you make just a brief comment on the DHF, whether or not it's a trade secret? Absolutely. I appreciate the chance to do so, Judge Reyna. … The – and I would dispute the premise that the limitations period is run.

Oral argument — Biery v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2014

This is a Trails Act takings case in which the government's liability turns upon an issue of Kansas state law. … The corridor was condemned within about a 10-year period. You have these quick claim deeds from a few specific owners.

Oral argument — Go Medical Industries v. Inmed Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2006

The reasonable royalty was a figure plucked out of the air, 3%, but it was based on excess profits. … The plaintiff sought additional claims for that period. To be honest with you, that leads into my best argument.