Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.26s
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 27, 2017
Williams, 423 U.S. 876, 96 S.Ct. 148, 46 L.Ed.2d 109 (1975). United States v. Cronic, 446 U.S. 648, 656-657 (1984) (emphasis added). … Charon, 482 So.2d 392, 393 (3d DCA 1985) (“youth, his inexperience with the law, his lack of counsel”); Thompson v.
Opposition Brief — Atterberry v. Jordan
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 378, 379 (1976). … Goode, 423 U.S.
469 U.S. 1208Information Reporting Requirements Under Internal Revenue Code Section 6039
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 17, 2009
phrase in 6039(a)(2) following the reference to section 423(c)) rather than whether or not the shares are disposed of in a qualifying disposition as also described in 423(c). … These commenters point out that the reported information may not be useful to nonresident aliens because they likely will not have any U.S. tax liability.
74 FR 59087Treasury DepartmentInternal Revenue ServiceSupreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025
Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 482-83 (1965). … Rahimi, 602 U.S. at 689 (quoting Bruen, 597 U.S. at 24) (emphasis added).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Safir v. Blackwell
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Supp. 423 (S. D. N. Y. 1967). … Supp. 423 (S. D. N. Y. 1967).
414 U.S. 975Amicus Brief — Cannon v. University of Chicago
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979
., at 423. … Rosado, 397 U.S., at 423.
441 U.S. 677Opposition Brief — Robert Ward Frazier, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 15, 2025
McCoy, 584 U.S. at 423. … McCoy, 584 U.S. at 422-423. 12 Nor does the decision below conflict with Brown.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Michelin, 423 U.S. at 285-86; Washington Stevedoring, 435 U.S. at 752-53. … See Michelin, 423 U.S. at 285.
517 U.S. 843Amicus Curiae Brief — Gonzalez v. Crosby
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Smith, 3 538 U.S. 254, 273 (2003); Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 442 (1987); TVA v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153, 189 (1978); Radzanower v. … See Crawford Fitting Co., 482 U.S. at 442. 2.
545 U.S. 524Record and brief — Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Sav. and Investment Plan
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2009
See McGowan, 423 F.3d at 247; U.S. Am. Br. 28. … Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 9 (1987). The legislative history reflects this congressional policy.
555 U.S. 285Opinion — Davis v. Portland Seed Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1924
C. 418-421, 423; 14 I. C. C. 82. … PORTLAND SEED CO. 423 403 Opinion of the Court.
264 U.S. 403Amicus Curiae Brief — Wilkinson v. Dotson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Helms, 459 U.S. 460 (1983)... 29 Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)............00...... 3, 22, 23, 29 Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423 (1987) ..0............cccccccseeeeeees 11 Sandin v. … Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 432 (1987). 12 ARGUMENT II - CHALLENGING SUITABILITY CRITERIA Suitability criteria - whether a decision’s factual basis is fitting and proper - is analogous to eligibility
544 U.S. 74Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schwimmer v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
Gartner, $18 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 915 (1975). … Jn re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 (1973); von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 (1987).
502 U.S. 810Petition — Jarrett v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
United States, 411 U.S. 233, 255) (Marshall, J., dissenting) To hold otherwise is simply to apply “an airtight system of forfeitures” (Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 482). … (a Hobbs Act case), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1014 (1975), and United States v.
465 U.S. 1004Federal Register · Notice · Dec 23, 2024
• Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. … FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirley Rohrer, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S.
89 FR 104568Nuclear Regulatory CommissionOpposition Brief — Crown Oil Corp. v. Lapidus Popcorn, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Supreme Court, U.S. rat FILED 0 ocT 3 1986 No. 86-287 JOSEPH F. SPANIOL, JR. … My business address is 423 Washington Street, Fourth Floor, San Francisco, California 94111.
479 U.S. 879Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Restivo v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
United States, 344 U.S. 414 (1953) . « « « « 21, 34 Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (1987). * * > ° . © . 7 50 Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 (1895) . « «© « » 50 Olden v. … Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 736 (1987). That was a decision made by the framers of the Constitution. The Fifth Circuit’s decision cannot stand side by side with the Constitution.
513 U.S. 807Petitioners Reply Brief — HARTZELL PROPELLER, INC. v. GAYNELL REYNO (Nos. 80-883, 80-848)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1981
Texaco, Inc., 521 F. 2d 448 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1052 (1976) .........seeeeee 2, 4, 5,6 Fitzgerald v. Texaco, Inc., 423 U. S. 1052 (1976) .......... 6 Fosen v. … See 28 U.S. C. § 1404(a) (1976).
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Mahnke v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1976
Texas, 386 U.S. 707, 710, 87 S. Ct. 1338, 1340, 18 L. Ed. 2d 423 (1967). … Bayer, 331 U.S. 532, 67 S. Ct. 1394, 91 L. Ed. 1654 (1947); Clewis v. Texas, 386 U.S. 707, 87 S. Ct. 1338, 18 L. 19 Ed. 2d 423 (1967).
425 U.S. 959Petition for Rehearing — Arizona v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1962
Tgwxas, 347 U.S. 272 (1954) .,...... 7 Arizona v. California, 283 U.S. 423 (1931)... RF 10, Se Arizona v. California et al., 298 U.S. 558 (1936).. Ashwander ‘v. … Georgia, 93 U.S. 4, 8, 9 (1876), . and that by consenting to the Compact the Con- gress has not enthroned it as a federal statute, Arizona v. California, 283 U. 8. 423, 456 (1931). Cf.
370 U.S. 930
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.