Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.48s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 28, 2005
Units” (the Clean Air Mercury Rule or CAMR; see 70 FR 28606). … (3) A “solid waste incineration unit” as defined in Clean Air Act section 129(g)(1) combusting “municipal waste” as defined in Clean Air Act section 129(g)(5) shall not be an electric generating unit
70 FR 62213Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 24, 2012
This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 and section 182 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 24, 2012. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: March 4, 2012. A.
77 FR 24440Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Approval Under Section 112(l); State of Iowa
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 25, 1998
These revisions are necessary to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act) and the Code of Federal Regulations and to improve the state's permitting program. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
63 FR 34618Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Idaho; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 18, 2018
SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires each State Implementation Plan (SIP) to contain adequate provisions prohibiting emissions that will have certain adverse air quality effects in other states … Quality Standards under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)” (memorandum).
83 FR 33892Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 2004
This revision is required by the Clean Air Act. … We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
69 FR 25865Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 12, 2003
We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
68 FR 69366Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 17, 2004
We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
69 FR 7389Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 1, 1996
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of NOx in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
61 FR 8008Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 6, 1996
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
61 FR 20201Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan Texas State II Program
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 6, 1994
On November 13, 1992, Texas submitted a SIP revision request to the EPA to satisfy the Clean Air Act, as amended (1990). … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 182(b)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA was required to issue guidance as to the effectiveness of Stage II systems.
59 FR 707Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 16, 2016
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 18, 2016. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
81 FR 39236Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 20, 2007
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
72 FR 19834Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 9, 2014
This action is in accordance with section 110 of the federal Clean Air Act (the Act, CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 10, 2014. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations
79 FR 1612Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 2, 2010
for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.” 74 FR 66496. … (a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are not met to the extent the plan, as approved, of the States listed in paragraph (b) of this section does not apply with respect
75 FR 53883Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Georgia: Procedures for Testing and Monitoring Sources of Air Pollutants
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 5, 2017
The portions of the SIP revisions that EPA is proposing to approve are consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: December 15, 2016.
82 FR 1296Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 11, 2014
EPA has provided guidance on redesignation in the “State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992) … Following EPA's public comment period, responses to any comments received will be addressed.
79 FR 20139Environmental Protection AgencyControl of Emissions of Air Pollution From New CI Marine Engines at or Above 37 kW
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 11, 1998
Warranty Periods Tied to the useful life is the minimum warranty period imposed under the Clean Air Act. … and redundant to adopt the same program under the Clean Air Act.
63 FR 68508Part IIEnvironmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 13, 2001
Air Act as a de minimis exemption. … Without today's proposed rule, manufacturers of ODSs for laboratory uses would be subject to the general ban on the production and import of class I ozone depleting substances under the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 14771Environmental Protection AgencyRevision to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Maricopa County Environmental Services Department
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 27, 2002
Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we are proposing to approve a local rule that regulates excess emissions from malfunctions, startups, and shutdowns. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
67 FR 54992Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 24, 1998
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), designations can be revised if sufficient data are available to warrant such revisions. … EPA will then address those comments in a final action based upon this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period.
63 FR 39793Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.