Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.96s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 19, 1999
The intended effect of this action is to regulate emissions of PM in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule. Any parties interested in commenting on this rule should do so at this time.
64 FR 45215Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 16, 1999
`Controlling Nitrogen Oxides under the Clean Air Act: A Menu of Options'', and ``Meeting the 15-Percent Rate-of-Progress Requirement Under the Clean Air Act: A Menu of Options'', California's ozone SIP … Air Act.
64 FR 70478Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Pinal County Air Quality Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 29, 2000
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), and to remove one rule from the SIP. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
65 FR 58500Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 23, 2002
The revisions clarify the requirement that ERCs be surplus to all requirements of the Clean Air Act (the Act) when used. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 48083Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 3, 2000
Act (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. DATES: Written comments must be received by March 6, 2000.
65 FR 5297Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 19, 2003
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the 1990 Clean Air Act, EPA is proposing to delegate national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants as they apply to non-major sources … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
68 FR 70752Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 24, 2003
We are proposing to approve local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
68 FR 14174Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 11, 2007
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to make a determination under the Clean Air Act (CAA) that the nonattainment area of Kewaunee County has attained the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS … Division, September 4, 1992; “State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (ACT) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division
72 FR 70255Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; TN: Revisions to Logs and Reports for Startups, Shutdowns and Malfunctions
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 27, 2016
EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision because it is consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and federal regulations governing SIPs. … See “Clean Air Act Final Full Approval of Operating Permit Programs; Tennessee and Memphis-Shelby County,” 66 FR 56996 (November 14, 2001).
81 FR 49201Environmental Protection AgencyNational Priorities List for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, Proposed Rule No. 29
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 22, 1999
EPA considers all comments received during the comment period. … Can I Submit Comments After the Public Comment Period Is Over? Generally, EPA will not respond to late comments.
64 FR 39886Environmental Protection AgencyMontana Second 10-Year Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for Missoula
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 14, 2017
On September 19, 2016, the Governor of Montana's designee submitted a Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A(b) second 10-year limited maintenance plan for the Missoula area for the carbon monoxide (CO) National … The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
82 FR 43208Environmental Protection AgencyControl of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 28, 2022
This proposal is pursuant to EPA's authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate air pollutants emitted from mobile sources. … Air Act.
87 FR 17414Environmental Protection AgencyUpdates to New Chemicals Regulations Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 26, 2023
(iii) For releases into air, Clean Air Act operating permit numbers and a description of any Leak Detection and Repair program in accordance with 40 CFR parts 60, 61, 63, 65, 264 or 265 (related to the … (iii) For releases into air, Clean Air Act operating permit numbers and a description of any Leak Detection and Repair program in accordance with 40 CFR parts 60, 61, 63, 65, 264 or 265 (related to the
88 FR 34100Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 14, 2016
These provisions, which have never been required elements of state operating permit programs, are being removed because they are inconsistent with the enforcement structure of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and … The Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC), chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, was established to advise the EPA on issues related to the 1990 CAA Amendments.
81 FR 38645Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 2, 2003
The negative declaration certifies that HMIWI units, which are subject to the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), do not exist in the District of Columbia air pollution … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
68 FR 76Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 30, 2003
The EPA is approving emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen for cement kilns in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act. … The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
68 FR 44714Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 2, 2020
• Appendix VI (“Compliance with Other Clean Air Act Requirements”) provides the District's demonstration that the Plan complies with specific federal and California Clean Air Act requirements. … during a public comment period; and, (3) making a finding of adequacy or inadequacy.
85 FR 40026Environmental Protection AgencyMonterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary Regulations
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 6, 2020
regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. 33 CFR 336.0. … Request for Comments NOAA requests comments on this proposed rule, the draft management plan, and the draft EA. The comment period will remain open until September 4, 2020.
85 FR 40143Commerce DepartmentNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 19, 2009
Section 612 Statutory and Regulatory Background Section 612 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to develop a program for evaluating alternatives to ozone-depleting substances. … Air Act.
74 FR 53445Environmental Protection AgencyDesignation of Product Categories for Federal Procurement
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 14, 2011
Paperwork Reduction Act I. E-Government Act I. … Comments.
76 FR 56884Agriculture Department
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.