Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.20s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 22, 2018
Pinette, 515 U.S. 753 (1995) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10, 11 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19, 20 Epperson v. … Aguillard, holding the law unconstitutional because it lacked a secular purpose and symbolically endorsed religious ideas. 482 U.S. 578, 583, 592 (1987).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Marlean A. Ames, Petitioner v. Ohio Department of Youth Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2024
Clayton Cnty., 590 U.S. 644 (2020) ............................... 3, 15, 19 Castaneda v. Partida, 480 U.S. 482 (1977) ................................... 14, 16 Chadwick v. … Partida, 480 U.S. 482, 499 (1977). Likewise, this Court has rejected any categorical presumption that members of a group will not discriminate against members of that same group.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2025
Los Angeles Cnty., Cal., 482 U.S. 304 (1987) ................................................................. 10 Goldblatt v. … Los Angeles Cnty., Cal., 482 U.S. 304, 318–19 (1987) (recognizing that temporary takings are compensable); Tahoe-Sierra, 535 U.S. at 323 (drawing a hard distinction between physical takings and regulatory
Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Ed. of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66) v. Mergens
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Democratic _ National Committee, 412 U.S. 94 (1973) -........... Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) -.......... Engel Vv. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962) _-.................. Katzenbach v. … Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980) (per curiam), or from teaching religious dogma them- selves or in concert with visiting teachers, Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987); McCollum v.
496 U.S. 226Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Brown, 21 Ala. 482 EE 9 City Bank of Ala. v. Eskridge, 521 So. 2d 931 (Ala. Olympia Spa v. Johnson, 547 So. 2d 80 (Ala. … Brown, 21 Ala. 482 (1852); Terreli v. City of Bessemer, 406 So. 2d 337 (Ala. 1981).
499 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 14, 2025
Green, 446 U.S. 14 (1980) .................................................... 9 Egbert v. Boule, 596 U.S. 482 (2022) ...................................2, 4, 11, 13 Feres v. … . 482, 492 (2022).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sole v. Wyner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Laidlaw Environmen- tal Services, Inc., 528 U.S. 167 (2000) ..... 17 Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983) ..... 11, 18 Hewitt v. Helms, 482 U.S. 755 (1987) ......... 10 Maher v. … Helms, 482 U.S. 755 (1987), involved situations where the plaintiffs achieved no alteration at all of the legal relationship between themselves and defendants, much less a "material" one.’
551 U.S. 74Amicus Curiae Brief — City News & Novelty, Inc. v. Waukesha
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) ......... 14 City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., GE US. TIO CIGD 2 cc ccvccecucesntesusanee 17 East Brooks Books, Inc. v. … Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 467-68 (1987) (explaining Court’s reluctance to abstain in cases that raise facial challenges to statutes under First Amendment, noting that allowing claimant to “suffer the delay
531 U.S. 278Amicus Curiae Brief — Hammon v. Indiana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Brun, 416 F.3d 703(8th Cir. 2005) 0.0... cccceeeeeees U.S. v. Cromer, 389 F.3d 662 (6" Cir. 2004) ooecccccccccccccsecseseeeene US. v. Hinton, 423 F.3d 355 aii U.S. v. … E.g., U.S. v.
546 U.S. 976Amicus Curiae Brief — Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985)............. 5 New York v. Burger, 482 U.S.__, 96 L. Ed. 2d 601 EE CERURER SESS esesceseccececccceces passim O’Connor v. Oriega, 480 U.S.__, 94 L. … Ortega, 480 U.S. __, 94 L. Ed. 2d 714 (1987), and administrative searches of closely regulated industries, New York v. Bur- ger, 482 U.S. __, 96 L. Ed. 2d 601 (1987).
489 U.S. 602Amicus Curiae Brief — National Railway Labor Conference v. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 (1948) 0000000000... 4,12 Western Air Lines v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 480 U.S. 1801 (April 2, 1987)... 7 Woodbury v. … National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 303 (1943).
514 U.S. 1032Amicus Curiae Brief — Sharon Lynn Brown, Petitioner v. Polk County, Wisconsin, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 23, 2021
California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966) ..............8 State v. Brown, 932 N.W.2d 283 (Minn. 2020) ...........17 Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) .............................8 Washington v. … California, 384 U.S. 757, 772 (1966). “Prison walls do not form a barrier separating prison inmates from the protections of the Constitution.” Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 84 (1987).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Collins v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 53 (2017) (No. 16-1027)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Tyler, 436 U.S. 499 (1978).............000000000 11 New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987).............000008 11 Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984)........ 11,13 Olmstead v. … Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987) (holding that although a warrant was not required to search, the search still must be 2 With Jones, of course, we know now that Katz is only one way the government can violate
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 22, 2025
Collins, No. 25-482 (Nov. 19, 2025).................................. 4 Cook v. Principi, 318 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (en banc) ......... 12 Feliciano v. … Collins, No. 25-482 (Nov. 19, 2025).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2025
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ............. 14 Foote v. Ludlow Sch. Comm., 128 F.4th 336 (1st Cir. 2025)....................................... 5, 10, 13, 17 Fowler v. … The words of this Court in Edwards v, Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), address the school situation and identify it as a special relationship: Families entrust public schools with the education of their
Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984), to insulate Respondents from liability. … However, the Sony court first ruled that “time shifting,” viewed then as the primary use of the VCR, id. at 419, 423, was a fair use by the end user.
545 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — Devereaux v. Geary
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Supreme Court, U.S. PILED JAN 25 1366 No. 85-492 —etoetee. SPANIOL, JR, CLERK IN THE Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1985 ROBERT T. DEVERAUX, WILLIAM E. … APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT Brief for Phil Caruso as Amicus Curiae Interest of Phil Caruso RICHARD HARTMAN Attorn. for Phil Caruso 252-00 Horace Harding Expressway Little Neck, NY 11362 (718) 423
478 U.S. 1021Amicus Curiae Brief — Suter v. Artist M.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Barber, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 582, 16 L.Ed. Se I cereale aie 17 Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 95 S.Ct. 1200, 43 L.Ed.2d 482 Re 16 New Orleans Public Serv. v. … Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 95 S.Ct. 1200, 43 L.Ed.2d 482 (1975) (federal courts should abstain from enjoining civil nuisance proceedings); Penzoil Co. v.
503 U.S. 347Amicus Curiae Brief — Unicolors, Inc., Petitioner v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 10, 2021
Munchnick, 559 U.S. 154 (2010) .............................................................. 9 Russ Berrie & Co. v. Jerry Elsner Co., 482 F. … U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 25, 2023
Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437 (1987) ..............................................21 Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)....................................14, 20 Ernst & Ernst v. … Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 445 (1987) (“As always, ‘[w]here there is no clear intention otherwise, a specific statute will not be controlled or nullified by a general one, regardless of the priority
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.