Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.84s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 11, 1998
The [[Page 42787]] intended effect of these proposed SIP revisions is principally to regulate PM emissions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act … DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 10, 1998. ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Dave Jesson, Air Planning Office (AIR-2), Air Division, U.S.
63 FR 42786Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 15, 1997
or District) pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 110 and 112(l). … EPA will not institute a second public comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
62 FR 53588Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 13, 1997
FELOP regulations pursuant to section 112 of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this approval action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
62 FR 6750Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 1, 2016
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to revise the regulatory definition of volatile organic compounds (VOC) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). … We would address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this action.
81 FR 50408Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 23, 1996
The SIP revision was submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by October 23, 1996.
61 FR 49717Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Arizona
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 20, 1999
The Plan was submitted by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) for the State of Arizona to satisfy requirements of section 111(d) of the Federal Clean Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments must be received in writing by October 20, 1999.
64 FR 50788Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 19, 2003
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the 1990 Clean Air Act, EPA is proposing to delegate national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants as they apply to non-major sources … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
68 FR 70752Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Oregon
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 3, 2001
The SIP revisions were submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements under section 110. … EPA will not institute a second comment period; therefore any party interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
66 FR 40664Environmental Protection AgencyEmission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 30, 1999
47244]] the Clean Air Act. … under section 129 or section 111 of the Clean Air Act.
64 FR 47234Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Semiconductor Manufacturing
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 8, 2002
(See section 307(d)(7)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).) … Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act, in §§ 63.2 and 63.981, the General Provisions of this part (40 CFR part 63, subpart A), and in this section as follows: Semiconductor manufacturing
67 FR 30848Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 15, 2024
Sections 108 and 109 of the Clean Air Act (CAA, the Act) require the EPA to periodically review the air quality criteria—the science upon which the standards are based—and the standards themselves. … Air Act.
89 FR 26620Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 6, 1995
The intended effect of proposing approval of this rule is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
60 FR 12180Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 16, 1995
The intended effect of proposing approval of this rule is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
60 FR 8994Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 4, 1996
The intended effect of proposing approval of this rule is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
61 FR 56649Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 2, 2004
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GEPD) requested approval to implement and enforce State permit terms and conditions that … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
69 FR 63489Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee; Transportation Conformity Revisions
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 17, 2013
This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
78 FR 29096Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 22, 2005
We are proposing to remove an obsolete local permitting rule and are proposing to approve local rules that regulate volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
70 FR 8557Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 3, 2000
The intended effect of this action is to bring the AVAPCD SIP up to date in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: October 4, 2000.
65 FR 66202Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan; PSD Regulations
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 19, 2012
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. What revisions are included in the proposed approval? … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate
77 FR 36442Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 31, 2020
SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. … See section 503(c) of the Clean Air Act and 40 CFR 70.5(a)(1)(i) and 40 CFR 71.5(a)(1)(i).
85 FR 54178Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.