Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters1984

10,000+ results

0.07s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Billy Raymond Counterman, Petitioner v. Colorado

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2023

    Nov. 2, 2004);7 see also, e.g., NCBCP III, 2023 WL 2403012, at *19-24; Beaumont Chapter of the NAACP v. … Vogels, supra, at 24. Black women and other women of color are even more likely to experience harassment.

  • Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; XOFLUZA

    Federal Register · Notice · Aug 8, 2024

    The date the application was approved: October 24, 2018. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 210854 was approved on October 24, 2018. … In its application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 399 days of patent term extension. III.

    89 FR 64920Health and Human Services DepartmentFood and Drug Administration
  • Opposition Brief — Vernon Montrell Webster, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 15, 2019

    Ct. 399, 405 (2018). As this Court explained in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. … PSR ¶¶ 24, 26-28. Petitioner’s burglary convictions all involved violations of Wis. Stat. § 943.10(1)(a) (1989, 1993).

  • Opposition Brief — Gill v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

    App. 23-24. The court also found that produc- tion of the summoned financial records would not in- criminate petitioner (id. at 24-26). … United States, 425 U.S. 391, 399 (1976). 2. There is no merit to petitioner’s contention (Pet. 6-8) that enforcement of the summons would infringe the attorney-client privilege.

    493 U.S. 975
  • Memorandum — Charles Schneider & Co. v. Commissioner

    Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1975

    Commissioner, 399 F.2d 603, 606 (C.A. 9). … Nevertheless, petitioners contend (Pet. 24-26) that these salaries should have been found to be reason- able under Section 1.162-7 of the Regulations.

    420 U.S. 908
  • Emergency Application — William Frances Silvia, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 14, 2026

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). It is indisputable that Mr. Silvia will be irreparably harmed if his execution is allowed to go forward. The balance of equities weighs heavily in favor of a stay. … (Loran Cole executed 8/29/24; James Ford executed 2/13/25, Glen Rogers executed 5/15/25; Thomas Gudinas executed 6/24/25; Michael King executed 3/17/26; Dominick Occhicone executed 7/28/26; William Silvia

  • Memorandum — Beck v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1975

    Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970). … Hence an immediate search is constitutionally permissible. 399 U.S. at 51, 90 S.Ct. at 1981.

    423 U.S. 836
  • Brief for petitoner — Cohen v. Hurley (No. 84)

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for petitoner · 1960

    S. 399... .11, 34, 37, 39 Burke, In re, 351 P. 24 169 (S. Ct. of Arizona) ewana 26, 30 . iii Cammer vy. United States, 350 U. S. 399 .......... a... Cantelline v. MeClellan, 282 N. … S. 399; and Wel and Globe v. County of Los Angeles, - U.S. 1.

  • Security Zone; San Francisco Bay, Oakland Estuary, Alameda, CA

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 16, 2023

    Coast Guard; telephone 415-399-7443, email SFWaterways@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … To seek permission to enter the security zone in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, contact the COTP by VHF Marine Radio channel 16 or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.

    88 FR 10063Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Safety Zone; Crescent City 4th of July Fireworks; Crescent City Harbor, Crescent City, CA

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 23, 2013

    Hawn at 415-399-7442, or email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil . … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: April 1, 2013. Cynthia L.

    78 FR 23866Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Reply Brief — James Erin McKinney, Petitioner v. Arizona

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 9, 2019

    Fleming, 61 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2011) ........................................ 3 State v. Kilgore, 216 P.3d 393 (Wash. 2009) .................................... 3 State v. … See Pet. 24; see also Arizona Capital Representation Project and Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice Amicus Br. 3, 6-7. The State does not identify any vehicle problems, and there are none.

  • Reply Brief — Joe Elton Nixon, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 26, 2022

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ....................10 Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985) ......................2 Godfrey v. Georgia, 446 U.S. 420 (1980) .......................9 Hall v. … In light of Florida’s uniquely errorprone death penalty system (Pet. 24), the Court should reject that argument. 2 The canvass in the opposition brief (Opp. 17) is outdated (e.g., in its inclusion of

  • Reply Brief — Kari MacRae, Petitioner v. Matthew Mattos, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 14, 2025

    No. 24-355 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _________ KARI MACRAE, v. … Educ., 357 U.S. 399 (1958); Shelton, 364 U.S. 479; Keyishian v. Bd. of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967); United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Byron Christopher Chinchilla, Petitioner v. Greg Lewis, Warden

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 26, 2018

    De La Torre said he and his friends prevented Chinchilla from going through their pockets. 2 RT 399. Huitron said he did. 2 RT 184186. … Adraktas, #215323 Attorney For Byron Chinchilla 24

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 18, 2022

    JA423–24, 261. … Oliver, 399 F. Supp. 348, 355–57 (M.D. Ala. 1975) (noting and summarizing dozens of cases).

  • Safety Zone: Santa Cruz Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks Display

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 21, 2014

    Dykman at 415-399-3585, or email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: April 29, 2014. Gregory G.

    79 FR 29139Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Safety Zone; Redwood City 4th of July Fireworks Show; Port of Redwood City, Redwood City, CA

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 23, 2013

    Dykman at 415-399-3585, or email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: April 1, 2013. Cynthia L.

    78 FR 23869Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Security Zones; San Francisco Bay, CA

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 25, 2003

    L. 99-399), Congress amended section 7 of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA), 33 U.S.C. 1226, to allow the Coast Guard to take actions, including the establishment of security and safety zones, … [FR Doc. 03-29387 Filed 11-24-03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

    68 FR 66064Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Petitioners Reply Brief — United States v. Ross

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1982

    carefully analyzed the benefits gener- ally derived from warrants, and shown that they are greatly attenuated in the context of a search of a seized container such as respondent’s paper bag (Br. 21-24 … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970), and limit the automobile search exception to exigent cir- cumstances created by the mobility of an unsecured auto- mobile on the highway.

    456 U.S. 798
  • Reply Brief — Pennsylvania v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1972

    This Honorable Court has set forth the underlying prin- ciples governing railroad reorganizations in New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 US 392, 26 LEd 2d 691, 90 SCt. 2054 (1970), in which Mr. … Co., 26 F Supp 18, 24, aff’d sub nom Palmer v. 10 Warren, supra.

    409 U.S. 894

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.