Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2002

10,000+ results

0.42s

  • Intervenors Brief — Township of Midland v. Michigan State Boundary Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Intervenors Brief · 1978

    Supp. 1397, aff’d. mem., 399 U.S. 901, rehearing de- met, GED TW, GED CITI) oaceicessesccnssencsnecesnsenncen 21, 24, 25, 29 Alkire v. Cashman, 350 F. … On October 24, 1977, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its Decision in this ease.

    435 U.S. 1004
  • Brief of Respondent State of North Carolina in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Grundler v. Carolina

    Supreme Court brief · Brief of Respondent State of North Carolina in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1960

    C. 399, 106 S. E. 2d GOD city tt ncmnemnsinh 1, 10.¢14 * State v. Grundler and State v: Jelly, 251°N. … (see ‘Par. 24,.Vol. IIT, p. 41). ae.

    362 U.S. 917
  • Appendix — Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989

    Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 256, 276-78, 84 S.Ct. 710, 713, 723-24, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964). … Transcript, October 24, 1984, Volume 4, Morn- ) ing Session, pp. 19-21, 25-26, 91-92.

    488 U.S. 1043
  • Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Federal Register · Notice · Jul 25, 1997

    Form 24F-2--SEC File No. 270-399--OMB Control No. 3235-0456 Form N-1A--SEC File No. 270-21--OMB Control No. 3235-0307 Form N-3--SEC File No. 270-281--OMB Control No. 3235-0316 Form N-4--SEC File No. 270 … [FR Doc. 97-19627 Filed 7-24-97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-M

    62 FR 40126Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Supplemental Brief — Research Equity Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1980

    INSURANCE CoMPANY OF NorTH AMERICA, Respondent On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR PETITIONER Pursuant to Rule 24 … Talley Industries, Inc., 399 F.2d 396, 404 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1015. If the opinion of the court below prevails, the regulations would be struck down.

    444 U.S. 1010
  • Brief for the United States in Opposition — Burke v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1969

    United States, 399 F. 2d 471 (C/A. 5), certiorari denied, March 24, 1969 (No. 1327 Mise.,.this Term); Mc- Ewen v.

    395 U.S. 919
  • Brief for Respondent — McWilliams v. Comm.; Estate of McWilliams; & McWilliams v. Comm. of Int. Rev.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1946

    A. 399, sigan, 82 F. - DOE Ket eetiicsh amd ccchnipebebaesnhasw aes wwas a 12 United States v dimer. euckiie Aasn’s, 310 U. 8. 534. 20 ’ Webre Steib'Co. v. … A. 399, affirmed, 82 F. 2d 944 (GEAT by P 4 &. in : BT 4° MeWILLIAMS v.

    331 U.S. 694
  • Joint Appendix — Blanton v. North Las Vegas

    Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1989

    New York, 399 U.S. 66, 90 S. Ct. 1886 (1969); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194, 211, 88 S.Ct. 1477 (1968). … New York, 399 U.S. 66, S.Ct. 1996 (1969); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194, 211, 88 S.Ct. 1477 (1968).

    489 U.S. 538
  • Petition — Clark v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

    Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 46-47 (1970).

    434 U.S. 969
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sluder v. United Mine Workers

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

    Norge Division of Magic Chef, 486 U.S. 399 (1988). … A-3 On November 24, 1986, Mr.

    498 U.S. 810
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — MAITA V. WHITMORE (No. 74-925)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974

    New York, 1970, 399 U.S. 66, 68-9, and cases there cited. … (d) January 24, 1972: .

  • Respondents Brief — Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New York

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1968

    Bd. of Ed. of Phila., 357.U.S. 399 (1959) . .6, 11, 12 -. Berger v..New York, 338 U.S. 41 (1967) 6,17, 24, passim _ Brinegar-v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1948) .... 31 _ Caimara v. … Murphy, 24 AD2d 737 (1st Dep’t.,.1965).

    392 U.S. 280
  • Opposition Brief — Carlson v. Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997

    Toomer, 334 U.S. at 398, 399. … Toomer, 334 U.S. at 399.

    519 U.S. 1101
  • TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc.: Grant of Expansion of Recognition

    Federal Register · Notice · Aug 24, 2021

    DATES: The expansion of the scope of recognition becomes effective on August 24, 2021. … Table 1—List of Appropriate Test Standards for Inclusion in TUVRNA's NRTL Scope of Recognition Test standard Test standard title UL 399 Standard for Drinking-Water Coolers.

    86 FR 47335Labor DepartmentOccupational Safety and Health Administration
  • Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Federal Register · Notice · Aug 11, 2023

    AG2-399 re: Breach to be effective 10/6/2023. Filed Date: 8/7/23. Accession Number: 20230807-5055. Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/23. Docket Numbers: ER23-2575-000. … ET 8/24/23. The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system ( https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp ) by querying the docket number.

    88 FR 54610Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Brief for the Appellant — United States v. Swift & Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Appellant · 1932

    proceeding this intervener was active ‘in opposing modification of: the Consent Decree, and its right to appear and pagtic- ipate as a party litigant was fully recognized by the court below (R. 398, 399 … Extension of time was granted for docketing the case with the.Clerk of this court until December. 24, 19381 (R. 1819). ‘ This is a suit in equity brought by the Govern- ment against Swift & Co. and

    286 U.S. 106
  • Record and brief — United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCord

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1914

    State of Georaia - 24 294 The Los Angeles Switchina Case y 98 315 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Co. 98 317 Port Richmond and Beraen Point Ferry Co. v. … Ordean 325 & 326 399 Dale v. Pattison 330 412 Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. of Texas v. Harris 604 422 Johnson v. Gearlds 802 448 Equitable Surety Co. v.

    233 U.S. 157
  • Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. First National Bank of Cushing

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1971

    Unined Sates, 399 F.2d 220 (N0th Cie 1958) . Note: 3" eoferenien to Gls thd safer to eggs ei No. 1172 © SECURITY MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. … ne Hf 3° hia Hatt st iit | : 4 a «cnt ead ange a ais eb: sa 24%.

    401 U.S. 975
  • Emergency Application — Michael L. King, Petitioner v. Florida

    Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Mar 11, 2026

    Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). It is indisputable Mr. King will be irreparably harmed if his execution is allowed to go forward. The balance of equities weighs heavily in favor of a stay. … Florida, 607 U.S. ___, Case No. 25-6853 (25A926) (Feb. 24, 2026) (Sotomayor, J., respecting the denial of the application for stay of execution and denial of certiorari).

  • Respondents Brief — Oils, Inc. v. Blankenship

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1945

    Bosworth, 24 U. S. App. 341, 64 F. 448 4 Johnson v. Thomas, 16 F. Supp. vse 5 Julian v. Central Trust Co., 193 U.S. 93, 48 L. ed. 629, 24 S. Ct. Rep. 399 3 Milwaukee ete. Co. v. Milwaukee St. P. … S. 93, 48 Law Edition 629, 24 Supreme Court Report 399; Milwaukee cnd M. E. Co. v. Milwaukee St. P. R. Co., 2 Wall 609-613, 17 Law Edition 886-895; Wabash R. Co. v. Adelbert College, 208 U.

    323 U.S. 803

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.