Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
949 results
0.45s
Oral argument — Nawal Ali v. BC Architects Engineers, PLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025
section 1927 In looking at the case law I'm sorry, so we don't have to decide, let me put it this way When I look at the statute, it does sort of look to me like you need some kind of an affirmative act … to Check the record On that Okay But he Awarded it From was And again We have a rule 60 motion That's pending Before you Wanted to ask That you grant That as well To allow the District court Judge to Clean
46 min of audioOral argument — L.S. v. Pamela Shipman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2013
And I hope I'm, um, um, um, um, fair to judge wins comment, but the whole, the whole thing, and it seems to me, if I interpret it correctly, that he was, that he's right about this, that the whole question … And it, as an area authority, PB, I'm quoting from their brief as an air area authority. PBH is quote, a local political subdivision of the state.
55 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Saundra White
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017
Simply repeating a simplistic fraud, right with errors, over a period of years, I don't think changes the fundamental nature of the fraud, which is commonplace. … In other words, the district court wasn't making up out of thin air. You text on your cell phone. You could be sitting in your living room doing that.
37 min of audioOral argument — South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2024
To transform Kane Hoy into this new city, the developers needed permits under both the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the Clean Water Act. … And in fact, you can't come up with one for a project that's going to be conducted over a multi-year period like this one.
44 min of audioOral argument — Anthony Fidrych v. Marriott International, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019
Section 3315107 of that act, in the official comment, states, a foreign corporation that obtains a Certificate of Authority in a state thereby agrees that it is amenable to suit in the state. … I think the court has clean-up jurisdiction over them as a result of moving to overturn the default judgment.
46 min of audioOral argument — Lisa Covington v. MCIC, Incorporated
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2015
All I can say is that he testified that he worked on Liberty ships during that period of time. … Is there any evidence of when you spray that limpet, how long it is in the air or is it effective for somebody?
67 min of audioOral argument — L-3 Communications Corporation v. Serco, Incorporated
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016
This is a clean, clear way to head it off at the pass. … Either way, I think our arguments before that time period are still valid. If I may finish my sentence, I'm sorry. Of course. Thank you.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Phillip Thompson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2019
And so if the mere act of committing a violation makes a person a fugitive. … Well, then we're completely up in the air about, well, was the person somehow retroactively not a fugitive during that period if, in fact, they weren't actually guilty of the violation?
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Xavier Lymas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014
Yet each defendant was given the same 140-month sentence on the Hobbs Act Convention, no matter what his advisory guideline range was. … This was air. That's exactly what happened here.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jose Bran
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2014
I mean, the judge even commented on it from the bench, it looks like it's an erroneous verdict. Did you object to the verdict form? No, we did not object to the verdict form. … You have an obligation to act in the best interest of your client. Yes. You have to do that at all stages of the proceedings. Without question. Thank you. Thank you very much.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Eric Scott
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2018
They can have people come in and testify we had drugs over this period of time and that. … Your Honor, I have a… I mean, you could have tried this thing on that first indictment and kept it clean. Well, but this is… That's… But here's, all right, and here's what happens.
37 min of audioOral argument — Michael Livingston v. SC Dept. of Social Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021
In South Carolina, we have the Tort Claims Act, which covers DSS as a state agency. … They refer to comments made by one DSS attorney and some allegedly racist comments made by a DSS caseworker. I think those are wholly irrelevant here.
51 min of audioOral argument — Jason Gowen v. Gerald Winfield
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2024
Not only was it much closer in time, but there was a specific act that showed up. What about the ringleader comment? So you want to be a ringleader, huh? We've got a place for ringleaders. … It's not that I acted violent, it's because I complained.
40 min of audioOral argument — State of Kansas v. SourceAmerica
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 28, 2020
Military personnel are generally precluded from performing many cafeteria operations concerning cleaning and sanitizing tasks required to prepare and serve safe and high-quality food to the troops. … Would it be possible for me to offer one comment to that? Sure.
50 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Aaron Graham
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014
And that therefore, where a judge does what the district court did here, which is to say, well, let's keep it clean and let's not talk about these three things. … McDonald's robbery, every gas station robbery in the United States Attorney could theoretically go to a magistrate judge and say we want all the cell site location data for every phone within a two-hour period
55 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Evan Foreman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014
when it concluded that my client Michael Foreman was a career offender and in this case the district court did air because it applied the wrong burden of proof and analyzing two of Michael convictions … heard that the identical issue and I did not put arguments but if you get past that you want to raise the career offender and the acceptance responsibility yes your honor okay and I would rely on the comments
44 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Brian Terry
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2018
Where he commented on the government was also arguing, hey, fleeing is an intervening act, which was what was happening in the Sprinkle case. … Because it talks about a new act that's independent of the act that would allow a lawful arrest. Can you arrest someone for speeding when you're the passenger? Oh, no, no.
51 min of audioOral argument — Richard Sibert v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2017
I am looking at the service member's Civil Relief Act addendum to move out. … Congress also said if they incurred the obligation during the period of military service, we're not going to protect it. And he doesn't get the benefit of that act.
47 min of audioOral argument — Jason Krembel v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020
And where do you get the waiver of the sovereign immunity under the Federal Tort Claims Act? How do you get this under the Federal Tort Claims Act? Well, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Go ahead. … And it was that five-week period. And so essentially, Mr. Krimble's case is that during that five-week period, the BOP didn't ensure that I got my Mohs surgery done.
47 min of audioOral argument — Charles Plymail v. Patrick Mirandy
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021
Lee, that enforcing, applying the plain air standard. Before you go too much further down the procedural default argument, I think it's a great argument. It's just not one you made beloved. … They didn't comment on it, but it wasn't part of the holding at all. It was a throwaway. They probably didn't comment on it, didn't make a hold of it, because you didn't raise it.
69 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.