Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.41s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 1, 1999
The SIP revisions were submitted by the County and the State to satisfy the Federal mandate, found in section 128 of the Clean Air Act (Act), and in response to a SIP call letter to the Governor of New … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
64 FR 29255Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 13, 2004
This SIP revision satisfies the requirement of the Clean Air Act for the second 10-year update for the Southeast Florida area (Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties) 1-hour ozone maintenance plan. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
69 FR 7185Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 25, 2013
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 63929Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 28, 2015
In accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision because it demonstrates that Grants Pass will continue to meet the carbon monoxide National … Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for a second 10-year period beyond re-designation, through 2025.
80 FR 44923Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Montana
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 15, 2001
Finally, some provisions of the rules will be acted on at a later date. This action is being taken under section 110 and 111 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
66 FR 32594Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Clean Air Interstate Rule
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 31, 2007
The 30-day public comment period for the proposed rules ended on October 23, 2006. B. … It does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 41669Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 10, 2007
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
72 FR 1197Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 22, 1995
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone and that certain reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements, along with certain related requirements, of Part D of Title I of the Clean Air … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
60 FR 32477Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 14, 2003
We are proposing to approve a local rule under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by November 13, 2003. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
68 FR 59145Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 23, 2016
Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)” to provide guidance to states for interstate transport requirements specific to the PM 2.5 NAAQS. … The Georgia Air Quality Act Article 1: Air Quality (O.C.G.A.
81 FR 57544Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 16, 2014
to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise. … by the comment period deadline identified.
79 FR 41509Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Kern County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 8, 2005
We are proposing approval of a local rule and a recision of a rule that administer regulations and regulate emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
70 FR 11179Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 17, 2020
The Kenosha portion has met the requirements for redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)/Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR).
85 FR 21351Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho: State Board Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 1, 2013
Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.”
78 FR 46549Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 26, 1995
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone and that certain reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements, along with certain related requirements, of Part D of Title I of the Clean Air … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this notice. Any parties interested in commenting on this notice should do so at this time.
60 FR 27945Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 6, 1997
Pursuant to section 110 (a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Director of the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) submitted two requests to EPA dated November 25, 1996 and April 7, 1997 to revise certain … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by September 5, 1997.
62 FR 42221Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 10, 2011
These actions are being proposed pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and its implementing regulations. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 12, 2011. … The adequacy comment period for these MVEBs closed on April 25, 2011. No adverse comments were received during the adequacy public comment period.
76 FR 70091Environmental Protection AgencyInterstate Transport Prongs 1 and 2 for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 15, 2021
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from Kansas and Nebraska addressing the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) interstate transport … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations
86 FR 31645Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 3, 2001
These proposed standards will implement section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) by requiring all major sources to meet HAP emission standards reflecting the application of the maximum achievable control … Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act (CAA), in § 63.2, and in this section as follows: Baffles means an apparatus comprised of obstructions for checking or deflecting the flow
66 FR 35326Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 21, 1998
The intended effect of this action is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any [[Page 70360]] parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. DATES: Written comments must be received by January 20, 1999.
63 FR 70359Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.