Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.40s
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 9, 1998
I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
63 FR 60214Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Oregon; Lane Regional Air Protection Agency, Outdoor Burning
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 14, 2025
The public comment period for our proposed action ended on June 23, 2025. We received no comments. II. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
90 FR 39126Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Approval of a Single Source Order
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 14, 2020
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This direct final rule will be effective April 14, 2020, unless EPA receives adverse comments by March 16, 2020. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
85 FR 8408Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 30, 2001
The intended effect of this action is to approve these SIP revisions as meeting the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … Air Act.
66 FR 54666Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 25, 2005
Air Act. … In reviewing sections 111(d)/129 State Plans, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 9226Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri: Regional Haze
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 26, 2012
Specifically, these revisions address the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's rules that required States to prevent any future and remedy any existing anthropogenic impairment of visibility … Statutory and Executive Order Requirements Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations
77 FR 38007Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Maintenance Plan Revisions; Wisconsin
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 26, 2000
The Clean Air Act, in section 176(c), requires conformity of transportation plans, programs and projects to an implementation plan's purpose of attaining and maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality … The rule affects only one State, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. C.
65 FR 64142Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 25, 2021
This determination is based upon monitored air quality data for the PM 10 NAAQS during the years 2014 through 2018. The EPA is taking this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 33547Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 1999
EPA has reviewed the proposed SIP revision and determines that it is consistent with the Clean Air Act and applicable regulations and requirements. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
64 FR 17545Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 25, 1995
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included Monterey … On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
60 FR 54595Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 6, 2002
Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 38894Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 22, 2004
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 13225Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 18, 1997
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This final rule is effective June 2, 1997 unless by May 19, 1997, adverse or critical comments are received. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
62 FR 19049Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Virginia; Amendment to the State Operating Permit for GP Big Island, LLC
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 17, 2026
The public comment period for the proposed rulemaking ended on January 12, 2026, and the EPA received no comments during the public comment period. II. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
91 FR 20587Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 20, 1998
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included South Coast … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule.
63 FR 13529Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Update To Include New Jersey State Requirements
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 30, 2024
), as mandated by the Clean Air Act (CAA). … application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
89 FR 86250Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 9, 2001
EPA is approving these revisions to establish RACT requirements in the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.
66 FR 41793Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 9, 2008
An area source is defined in the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112(a) as any stationary source of HAP that is not a major source, and a major source is defined as any stationary source or group of stationary … Terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act, in 40 CFR 63.2, and in this section as follows: Additive means a material that is added to a coating after purchase from a supplier (e.g
73 FR 1738Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 22, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 13231Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; California; Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District; Reclassification
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 5, 2018
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received four comments that were submitted anonymously. … This final action does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 31334Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.