Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.24s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Criswell, 472 U.S. 400, 414-415, 421-423 (1985). 2. … See also Crisweli, 472 U.S. at 414-415, 422-423 (BFOQ burden of proof on employer under the ADEA).
499 U.S. 187Amicus Curiae Brief — Chike Uzuegbunam, et al., Petitioners v. Stanley C. Preczewski, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 25, 2020
Helms, 482 U.S. 755 (1987) ............................................. 7 Holt Civic Club v. … Helms, 482 U.S. 755, 761 (1987). Second, an award of nominal damages “holds [the government] responsible for its actions and inactions,” Amato v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Menillo, 423 U.S. 9 (19 DUiaeeceeneceseseeeseceescoeocooceseseeoeesed Cort Vv. Ash, 422 U.S. 66 ee DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974)..19 Diffenderfer v. … Menillo, 423 U.S. 9 (1975); Plannea- Parent ot Central Missouri “9 nftort 4 76); otti v.
476 U.S. 747Amicus Curiae Brief — Diamond v. Charles
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973); Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975); Connecticut v. Menillo, 423 U.S. 9 (1975); Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. … Wade, 410 U.S. at 165; Connecticut v. Menillo, 423 U.S. at 10-11.
476 U.S. 54Amicus Curiae Brief — Abrams v. Johnson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Bradley, 433 U.S. 267 (1977) 7 Missouri v. Jenkins, 115 S. Ct. 2038 (1995) 7 Reynolds » Sima, 377 U.S. 533 (1964) . 4 Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976) wae 7 Rogers v. … Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 378-80 (1976); Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 738, 744 (1974) ; Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 16 (1971).
517 U.S. 1207Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 30, 2018
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ................................................ 4 Kerry v. Din, 135 S. Ct. 2128 (2015) ........................................ 4, 5 Kleindienst v. … Dist., 530 U.S. at 308). The objective observer must also be familiar with the “specific sequence of events leading to [the act’s] passage.” Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 594-95 (1987).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Illinois v. Perkins
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973) 23 United States Vv. Scalf, 725 F.2d 1272 (10th Cir. 1984) " 11 I'nited States Vv. Washinaton, 431 U.S. 181 (1977) 9 I'nited States Vv. … United States, 385 U.S. 206 (1966); Hoffa v. United States, supra; United States v. White, 401 U.S. 745 (1971): United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973); Hampton v.
496 U.S. 292Amicus Curiae Brief — FMC Corp. v. Holliday
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
PTT TT CLUE Dene eeeeeoeee 11, 30 Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 107 S.Ct. e2ll, 96 L.Ed 2d 1 (1987) Powell v. … Raybestos- Manhattan, Inc., 451 U.S. 504, 522, 101 v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 107 S.Ct. 2211, 2216-2217, 96 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987); Shaw, 463 U.S. at 105.
498 U.S. 52Amicus Curiae Brief — Leonard W. Hoffmann, et al., Petitioners v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2026
New Jersey, 594 U.S. 482 (2021) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2, 5, 6, 7, 12 Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 18.27 Acres, 59 F.4th 1158 (11th Cir. 2023) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6, 14, 15 Tenn … New Jersey, 594 U.S. 482, 498–99, 507–08 (2021). The cases applying the NGA confirm the distinction.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 1, 2026
S. 423 (2020) ............................................................................. 17 Reynolds v. … S. 423, 424 (2020) (per curiam).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 1, 2026
S. 423 (2020) ............................................................................. 17 Reynolds v. … S. 423, 424 (2020) (per curiam).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Mata v. Holder, 135 S. Ct. 1039 (2015) (No. 14-185)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010).................... 19 Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988) .......................- 33 ICC v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng’rs, 482 RE EE SRE Ne 37, 39, 42 INS v. … Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng’rs, 482 U.S. 270, 283 (1987) (emphasis in original).
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Burke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 (1987) ..................... 5 Hodge v. Commissioner, 64 T.C. 616 (1975)......... hieitaamomanat 13 Mallard v. U.S. … Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656, 662 (1987). In that case, the Court incorporated the statute of limitations for personal injury claims as the most appropriate statute for §1981 actions.
504 U.S. 229Amicus Curiae Brief — Sullivan v. Zebley
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
IV suse 42 U.S.C.§405(g) .....--- 6-06 + 22 §$223(d) (5) (A), 42 U S.C. $423(d) (S) (A). 9 Tit. XVI, 42 U.S.C. $1381 et seq. (1982 & Supp. … consistent with the medical signs and findings), would lead to a conclusion that the tissue) must be considered in reaching a conclusion as to whether the individual is under a disability.‘ 42 U.S.C. § 423
493 U.S. 521Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio v. Robinette
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Turner, F.2d 956 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 881 (1991) ..........ccccccceeeeeeeneees 18 United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976) ......... 21 United States v. … Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 424 (1976) (“(T]he absence of proof that [the defendant} knew he could withhold his consent, though it may be a factor in the overall judgment, is not to be given controlling
519 U.S. 33Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Statistics, U.S. … Statistics, U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 657 (2018) (No. 18-15)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Porter County Chapter of Izaak Walton League, Inc., 423 U.S. 12 (1975) ....................-. capenitt Sibbebtaiiens 14 Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. … Chapter of Izaak Walton League, Inc., 423 U.S. 12, 14-15 (1975) (Atomic Energy Commission interpretation of regulation concerning location of nu- clear plants); United States v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 2, 2026
Espinoza, 591 U.S. at 482 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). III. … Espinoza, 591 24 U.S. at 482 (“The no-aid provisions of the 19th century hardly evince a tradition that should inform our understanding of the Free Exercise Clause.”). B.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Pavan v. Smith, 137 S. Ct. 2075 (2017) (No. 16-992)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 12 (1967); Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374, 384 (1978): Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 95 (1987). … Id.; see Loving, 388 U.S. at 12; Zablocki, 434 U.S. at 384; Turner, 482 U.S. at 95.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Zoltek Corp. v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2936 (2007) (No. 06-1155)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
ii) the fact that subsequently Con- gress provided patentees with a remedy for government infringement by separate enactment, Act of June 25, 191 0, ch. 423, 36 Stat. 851, action that in the court’s … Act of June 25, 1910, ch. 423, 36 Stat. 851 (“1910 Patent Act”). One may question why such an explicit” grant was necessary with respect to patents and not realty.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.