Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

1,016 results

0.59s

  • Oral argument — Agere Sys Incetal v. Ad v. En v. Tech Corpetal

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2009

    Well, that's an interesting comment because if you read the opinion, which I'm sure you did, they had a 113 counterclaim. … So any other person means any other person, period. And as Your Honor pointed out in talking to Mr.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mirabella v. Villard

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2016

    So it's your view that it cannot be a retaliatory act if all one is doing is complying with their legal requirement? Correct. And they're simply alerting Mr. … Mirabella that they had certain rights under Rule 1023.1 to seek sanctions if he filed a frivolous lawsuit, period. And if the same email was sent to a non-attorney, would you argue it the same?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Zayas

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021

    It was an open-air playground, and it serves children. … Even Congress would not act that irrationally, would they?

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lagano v. Bergen County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

    If they find out there's true malfeasance here, their hands are going to be washed clean from any indemnification obligation. … I have not even seen a case going through the football analysis, you know, step by step in a relatively lengthy period of time.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tejwaniv.Atty Gen

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    It's taking dirty money and making it clean. … Stanton is correct, the Board, the President of the Circuit, Brasino, precludes a new period from restarting.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Admissions_Kubiak v. Canon

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2017

    So I know the court was no longer acting on it, but I didn't see anything on the docket to reflect that. Right. … I can't comment on that.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re Petition of Frescati

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

    Most of these cases, trial judges are not looking at a period of 11 years and $143 million loss at the outset. … I mean, the key here is to get that cleaned up in the first instance and then sort of sort out kind of who's responsible for it. But, you know, Judge Hardiman, you're absolutely right.

    59 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Homav.American Express Co

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    Bland conceded as much in his opening comments by saying that I think his comment was to the effect that Mohammed involved, you know, looking at the facts of that case. … I mean, there's a wealth of case law and comment, regulatory comment, about the need for banks to be able to operate in a uniform fashion nationally. And if you accept Mr.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lancaster v. Attorney General USA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2017

    So why should it be remanded for a clean record here and have it assessed without what I would say is clear prejudice against the petitioner? … Most of her comments were made – and I read that there were two long passages.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Nursingcaremanagement Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2024

    , cleaning, medicating their attendee. … Correct, Your Honor, but you have to take some period of time to get to the office in the first place, and the Portal to Portal Act clearly precludes that.

    57 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Williams v. Secretary PA Department of Corrections

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2016

    The policy 6.5.8 allows them to act as they did, but that policy doesn't flow necessarily from the Pennsylvania statute. … view, that makes it even more egregious because it's not only Williams and Walker but the whole legal scenario puts the legality of the death penalty, the policy of the death penalty is really up in the air

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Rought

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2021

    Did the question really elicit comment about the thing he didn't want to talk about? Well, it was at the behest of the FBI agent. … And you can limit it in scope in Barrett, at least as far as to the act. The rationale would be the same here. And in Roberson, a key fact.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Alaris Health v. NLRB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2024

    It ends for this period to that period. What the board has said is that's not what happened. You committed an unfair labor practice, so it continues on. Nobody negotiated it. … All right, so if we disagree with you, you're saying the remand is in order to allow the parties to air out just how much would be owed and what the theory is?

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Associated Builders v. Community College

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2023

    to the coverage of the National Labor Relations Act. … The one PLA that you pointed to, that contract period is closed. That's correct. So we can still seek retrospective relief with respect to that particular project.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Port Authority Trans Hudson v. Sec US Dept Labor

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2014

    , governing the air, the aircraft, the airline industry. … It's an interesting case also because I didn't want it to seem an esoteric comment.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — American Boardv.Muller

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2013

    What this says is if you look back later, an individual was found by a jury to have violated the Copyright Act with respect to 21 questions on a board specialization certification exam, period. … You're writing on a clean slate here. What would you do after that? What would I do? Yeah, this is...

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Costerv.Watts

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010

    One thing that confused me here, whenever he went to the medical folks at the institution, they always commented about how the hernia could be reduced with manipulation. … A recognition that they were at fault, or simply a recognition that somebody might think they were at fault, and it would be better if you clean this up right now.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — France v. Bernstein

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2022

    The Federal Arbitration Act requires us to initiate subpoena enforcement actions in the district encompassing the site of the arbitration. I think it's Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act. … The compliance date is today because we have a flight record from Delta Air Lines we got after we were able to do discovery in the Middle District case, and Delta Air Lines says that Todd France had a

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — USAv.Gillette

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2013

    DeRusso say here that there's a question, at least in his mind, probably is in ours too, that the 1983 remedy against the territory is at least up in the air, even if it's prospective. … And the period of time in which Mr. DeRusso was representing Mr. Gillette was not that long, and when you signaled that you didn't think 2241 was the proper remedy, they moved to intervene.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re Grand Jury Subpoena

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2013

    If the court was writing on a clean slate, we would think that we should be present. The appellant should have been present at the initial question. … But in this case, we have ongoing representation by an attorney over a period of years.

    47 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.