Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.21s
Federal Register · Rule · May 13, 1998
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
63 FR 26462Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 3, 2015
During this period, EPA received five comments from one anonymous commenter. … Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02
80 FR 11323Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Particulate Matter Standards
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 29, 2013
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 19128Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 2, 2008
Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we are approving local rules that address circumvention, reduction of animal matter, and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 48Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 24, 1995
Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA). … These revisions address the requirements of section 507 of title V of the Clean Air Act and establish the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Program.
60 FR 10323Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 23, 2012
During this period, EPA received two comment letters: one from NDEP on September 4, 2012 (herein “NDEP's comment(s)”); and one from Washoe County Health District Air Quality Management Division (WCHD-AQMD … Air Act.
77 FR 64737Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 20, 1999
The intended effect of approving of these rules is to regulate emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 19277Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 18, 2014
Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise. … The comment period was open for 30 days and we received two adverse comment letters. II.
79 FR 21852Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 29, 2016
Puerto Rico submitted its plan to fulfill the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This rule is effective on May 31, 2016. … The Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board (PREQB) developed a plan, as required by sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), to adopt the EG into its body of regulations, and EPA is acting
81 FR 25611Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Hawaii; Regional Haze Progress Report
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 12, 2019
This SIP revision addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) and the EPA's rules that require states to submit periodic reports describing the progress toward reasonable progress goals … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 11, 2019.
84 FR 39754Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 18, 2003
We are approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 54672Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 1, 2016
Air Act.” … Air Act.
81 FR 18766Environmental Protection AgencyTransitional and General Opt Out Procedures for Phase II Reformulated Gasoline Requirements
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 20, 1997
This application of regulatory criteria on a case by case basis to future individual situations does not require notice and comment rulemaking, either under section 307(d) of the Clean Air Act or the Administrative … The authority citation for part 80 continues to read as follows: Authority: Secs. 114, 211, and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7414, 7545 and 7601(a)). 2.
62 FR 54552Transitional and General Opt Out Prodecures for Phase II ReformulatedEnvironmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 2005
Final Action EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the Georgia SIP because they are consistent with the Clean Air Act and Agency requirements. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 18991Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 3, 2013
Air Act. … Air Act.
78 FR 40015Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Minnesota
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 26, 2002
In response to Part D requirements of the Clean Air Act, MPCA submitted a final SO 2 plan on August 4, 1980. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 8727Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 23, 1995
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This final rule is effective October 23, 1995 unless adverse or critical comments are submitted before September 22, 1995. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
60 FR 43714Environmental Protection AgencyDesignation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; State of Arizona; Pinal County; PM10
Federal Register · Rule · May 31, 2012
Air Act planning purposes and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. … The EPA believes that the requirements of NTTAA are inapplicable to this action because they would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act. J.
77 FR 32024Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 3, 2006
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 10838Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Rhode Island; Reasonably Available Control Technology for US Watercraft, LLC
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 3, 2017
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective September 1, 2017, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 2, 2017. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 30747Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.