Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
4,691 results
0.16s
Petition — Williams v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 96 S.Ct. 820, 46 L.Ed. 2d 598 (1976) .... . 26 Wallace v. King bn, case Citi, ceen 1, 189607) 5. 13 (vi) No. … Watson decision, 423 U.S. 411, 96 S.Ct. 820, 46 L.Ed. 2d 598 (1976). The sanctity of the home is the most important right the Fourth Amendment seeks to protect. U.S. v.
449 U.S. 1112Petition — FTC v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Gressette, 482 U.S. 491 -.......... 12 Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., a anid aarniins 17, 21 NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. LESS Sd ee ee On 15 Parisi v. … Collins, 397 U.S. 159, 165 (1970). See Morris v. Gressette, 482 U.S. 491, 501 (1977); Dunlop v. Bachowski, 421 U.S. 560, 567 (1975).
449 U.S. 232Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
denied, 423 U.S. 906 (1975) ............... 2, 5, 6, 7,8 Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705, 89 S.Ct. … City of New Orleans, 415 U.S. 130, 133-34, 415 U.S. 130, 94 Sup.Ct.Rep. 970, 39 L.Ed. 2d 214 (1974). See also, Walker v. Dillard, 523 F.2d 3 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 906 (1975).
451 U.S. 907Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
REA Express, Inc., 523 F.2d 164 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1017, 1073 (1976). … REA Express, Inc., 523 F.2d 164, 167 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1017, 1073 (1975, 1976).
432 U.S. 910Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Laub, 885 U.S. 475 ...... 13 United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 .... 17 United States v. Powell, 423 U.S. 87...... 17 United States v. Rutherford, 442 U.S. 544 . 17 Urtetiqui v. … Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 755-756, 759-760 (1974); United States v. Pow- ell, 423 U.S. 87, 92-93 (1975). Similarly, the challenged regula- tion does not abridge respondent’s freedom of speech.
453 U.S. 280Petition — Higgins v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 92 S.Ct. 455 (1971). … Bearden, 423 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. den. 400 U.S. 836, 91 S.Ct. 73 (1970).
436 U.S. 958Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Hisquierdo, 439 U.S. 572, 99 S.Ct. … Hisquierdo, U.S. , 59 L.
453 U.S. 922Petition — Thill Securities Corp. v. New York Stock Exchange
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Federal Power Comm’n, 369 U.S. 482, 485 [82 S.Ct. 901, 903, 8 L.Ed. 2d 54]. … United States, 371 U.S. 296, 83 S.Ct. 476, 9 L.Ed.2d 325 (1963) ; California v. FPC, 369 U.S. 482, 82 S.Ct. 901, 8 L.Ed.2d 54 (1962).
450 U.S. 998Petition — UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA v. FORD (Nos. 75-1478, 75-1475)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975). … Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970); Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701 (1969) ; Allen v. State Board of Education, 393 U.S. 544 (1969) .”
Petition — Cosby v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
South Carolina, 409 U.S. 524, 93 S. Ct. 848 (1973); Swain v. Alabema, 380 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 824 (1965). … Martin, 482 F.2d 202 (8th Cir. 1973).
426 U.S. 935Petition — Board of Assessors of Boston v. Tregor
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Cromwell, 326 U.S. 620, 624 (1946). … Browning, 310 U.S. 362 (1940).
444 U.S. 841Petition — Moore v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
LaFache, Esq., of counsel TO: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ® NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 369 Federal —— a i osgett New York 13260 (315) 423-5165 John J. McMann, Esq. Joseph A. … Holohan 294 U.S. 103 (1964). . . 6 O'Brien v. U.S. 386 U.S. 345 (1967) .. . 11,12 U.S. v. Agurs 427 U.S. 97 (1975). .... 6 U.S. v. Bess 593 F.2d 749 (6th Cir.,1979). 6 U.S. v.
467 U.S. 1204Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Zillman, Free Speech and Military Command, 1977 Utah L.Rev. 423, 433-34. 10a . at large. Prior restraints on speech face a heavy burden of justification, which they are seldom able to meet. … Oklahoma, 413 U.S. at 615-16, 93 S.Ct. 2908. IV.
444 U.S. 348Petition — United States v. Ortiz
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1975
Tucker, No. 73-482, decided SK RE eee = ee ae United States v. … Within the INS, the U.S.
422 U.S. 891Petition — Rosenblum v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479. … Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), cited by plaintiffs.
434 U.S. 818Petition — MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS ASSN. v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE (Nos. 79-378, 79-377, 79-379)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, 423 U.S. 326, 333-34 (1976) and in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation y. Na- tional Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al., 435 US. 519 (1978). … Jd., 435 U.S. 519, 558.
Petition — Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
re Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission’s Rules and Regulations (Computer Inquiry), 64 F.C.C.2d 771 (1977) (Supplemental Notice of Inquiry). 16 Computer II Final Decision, 77 F.C.C.2d at 423 … * Computer II Final Decision, 77 F.C.C.2d at 482. ** Jd. at 483.
461 U.S. 938Petition — Mellon Bank, N. A. v. Southland Mobile Homes of South Carolina, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Elmira er Bank, 161 U.S. 275 (1896) Dearing, 91 U.S. 29 (1875) _....... First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson, 396 U.S. 122 (1969) . … Gosnell, 264 S.C. 619, 216 S.E.2d 5389 (1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 1048, 96 S.Ct. 774, 46 20 MELLON BANK v. SOUTHLAND Mos. HoMEs, ET AL.
439 U.S. 900Petition — Kaiser v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Co., 396 U.S. 324 (1969) and Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 (1967). … Baker, 482 F.2d 228 (6th Cir. 1973); see Elgin J. & E. Ry. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 (1945).
461 U.S. 943Petition — Shelton v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
U.S. Dist. Court, Unpub. Memo #79-7001 6 James Shelton v. U.S. Customs, etc. 565 s.cd 1140 (9th cir. 1977) 6 James Shelton v. U.S., Unpub. Memo #/8=3695 ry Lincoln National Life Ins.Co.v. … Yungkau, 329 U.S. 482 The process in the 9th circuit courts was not timely and it is clear that the courts, therefore, lacked jurisdiction.
463 U.S. 1209
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.