Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2010

10,000+ results

0.30s

  • Petition for Rehearing — Johnston v. McIntee

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1950

    Hall, 75 F. 2d 399, where the transferee became sole party plaintiff. … Both ‘‘Plaintiff’s Amended and Supplemented Complaint, as Further Amended and Supplemented’’ (Tr. 24-5) and plaintiff’s affidavit in support of his motion to be substituted (Tr. 17-24) state flatly

    340 U.S. 817
  • Reply Brief — M2 Software, Inc. v. Viacom, Inc. (No. 07-202)

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007

    Renosky, 399 F.3d FO Es ITED wecniecienntivecicovbistinrtternrcssvensevceoes 9 Blau v. YMI Jeanswear, Inc., No. CV 02- 09551 FMC (SHSx), 2004 WL 5313967 CET EF. … See Pet. 5 n.2, 24-25.

  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Lefors v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1955

    Crim. 399, 208 S.W. 2d 643 (1948) _... 7 Hooker v. Los Angeles, 188 U.S. 314 (1903)... 14 Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 535 (1884) 13 Leeper v. … Crim. 399, 208 S.W. 2d 643 (1948).

    349 U.S. 929
  • Opposition Brief — Duffy v. City of Long Beach

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

    Los Angeles (1959) 170 Cal.App. 2d 399 + a a a e = o 16 Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & W.Co. (1919) ana Wels 246, 164 id. 394) 2 2 2 es 6 Kent Island Joint Venture v. … City of Los 16 ‘ Angeles [1959] 170 Cal.App.2d 399.)

    471 U.S. 1102
  • Reply Brief — Harris v. Ariz. Indenpendent Redistricting Comm'n, 135 S. Ct. 2926 (2015) (No. 14-232)

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2015

    Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 446 (2006); see also App. 3la—34a. 3. See Abrams v. Johnson, 521 U.S. 74, 91 (1997). 5 I. … Mot. to Affirm, pp. 24- 27. The IRC argues Shelby County does not retroactively negate its supposed reliance on §5. But see Harper v. Va.

  • Amicus Brief — Quaglino v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978

    Kelly, 17 C.3d 24, 130 Cal.Rptr. 144, 549 P.2d tee eee Ula ok aU Soh deen bay Gk bat 7,10 Pointer v. … Kelly, 17 C.3d 24, 35, 190 Cal. Rptr, 144, 549 P.2d 1240 ( 076); United States vu.

    439 U.S. 875
  • Reply Brief — Tonahill v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1970

    ‘OCT 24 2970 E. ROBERT SEAVER “CLERK Simin Court of the United States a OCTOBER m™u 1970 Sean Se 672 .. JOE H. … ‘den... 399 U.S. 910 © 4 ‘United States v. Neves, 269 F.Supp. 159 (S.D. N.Y. 1967) : United States v. Remolif, 227 F.Supp. 420 (D.C. Nev. 1964) . Rayrts 1 Aaae — United States v.

    400 U.S. 943
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wade Bonk, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 17, 2023

    Bonk's appeal was decided on July 24, 2020, and his appeal was finalized 90 days 9 later, which is the time for filing a writ of certrorari expires, which was October 24 5 2020. … Mankiewicz, 122 F.3d 399 (7th Cir. 1997).

  • Opposition Brief — Dennis Morgan Hicks, Petitioner v. Alabama

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 22, 2023

    Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)........................................................................... 13 Crawford v. … Pet. 24), and that the nonverbal responses from Jo.N. and Ja.N.

  • Reply Brief — Center for Medical Progress, et al., Petitioners v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 6, 2023

    South Suite 250 Austin, TX 78746 (512) 399-3022 Harmeet K. Dhillon Mark P. Meuser DHILLON LAW GROUP 177 Post Street, Ste. 700 San Francisco, CA 94108 (415) 577-2850 Jeffrey M. … BIO.24. It instead tries to sweep this all away by focusing on differences between the laws at issue in each case. BIO.24. But the divergence is unmistakable.

  • Reply Brief — Michigan, Petitioner v. Floyd Russell Galloway, Jr.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 27, 2024

    No. 24-198 In the Supreme Court of the United States PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, PETITIONER v. FLOYD RUSSELL GALLOWAY, JR. … United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998) .......................................... 5, 9 United States ex rel. Shiflet v.

  • Reply Brief — Benancio Garcia, III, Petitioner v. Steven Hobbs, Secretary of State of Washington, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 10, 2026

    Reeves, 961 F.3d 800, 801 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc) (emphasis added); see also Pet. 24 n.1 (collecting analogous cases from other circuits). … Pet. 25 (quoting Appellee State of Washington’s Answering Brief at 21, Garcia, No. 24-2603 (9th Cir. Oct. 16, 2024), DE 23.1).

  • Extension of Approved Information Collection, OMB Control Number 1004-0001

    Federal Register · Notice · Jan 12, 2010

    Persons who use a telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) on 1-800-877-8339, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact Mr. Bowmer. … [FR Doc. 2010-399 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-84-P

    75 FR 1647Interior DepartmentLand Management Bureau
  • Public Meeting for the Steens Mountain Advisory Council, Oregon

    Federal Register · Notice · May 12, 2023

    L. 106-399). … [FR Doc. 2023-10118 Filed 5-11-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4331-24-P

    88 FR 30781Interior DepartmentLand Management Bureau
  • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Regulation and Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations-Proposed Revisions; Public Meetings

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 3, 2006

    Addresses for Public Meetings EPA is conducting five public meetings on the CAFO proposed regulations as described in the following table:   Date Location Time Facility Mon., July 24 … EPA, 399 F.3d 486 (2nd Cir. 2005). The proposed regulations, publishing in the Federal Register on June 30, 2006, respond to the court ruling. Dated: June 27, 2006. Jane S.

    71 FR 37880Environmental Protection Agency
  • Memorandum for the United States in Opposition — Dobkin v. District of Columbia

    Supreme Court brief · Memorandum for the United States in Opposition · 1965

    condemning authority to pay just compensa- tion, even though the amount of the compensa- tion remains to be determined and paid at a later date. 3 i The New York statute applicable to this case (24 … Kieselbach, 127 F. 2d 359 (C.A. 3), affirmed as to another issue, 317 J.S. 399, where the court held that for the purposes of com- puting the holding period of a capital asset the owner ceased to held

    380 U.S. 962
  • Opposition — Watkins v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977

    On August 24, 1974, an informant told Secret Service Agent Barry Sternberg that a person called “Tony” possessed about $3,000 worth of stolen bonds payable to Joseph Camp and a trying to locate a buyer … United States, 399 U.S. 911. -3-

    429 U.S. 1034
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gretchen A. Haffer, Petitioner v. New Hampshire

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 16, 2018

    Livingston, 153 N.H. 399, 402 (2006). … Pursuant to RSA 188-F:31, I (Supp. 2016), "a penalty assessment of $2 or 24 percent, whichever is greater" shall be added to every fine for a criminal offense .

  • Reply Brief — Reginald Young, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 8, 2020

    Co., 559 U.S. 393, 399 (2010) to the “affidavit of merit” now required by 28 states as a prerequisite to adjudication of a medical negligence claim. 1 Heather Morton, Medical Liability/Malpractice Merit … Affidavits and Expert Witnesses, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES (June 24, 2014), https://www.ncsl.org/research/financial-services-and-commerce/medical-liability-malpracticemerit-affidavits-and-expert-witnesses.aspx

  • Opposition Brief — Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990

    Rev. 399 (1969)... … Rev. 399 (1969).

    496 U.S. 905

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.