Documents

Amicus Brief — Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Miller, 61 Ohio St.2d 6, 399 N.E.2d 66 (1980) ........ Sword v. Sword, 399 Mich. 367, 249 N.W.2d 88 (1976) ........ Tetro v. Tetro, 86 Wash.2d 252, 544 P.2d 17 (1975) .......... … Sword, 399 Mich. 367, 381, 249 N.W.2d 88 (1976); Duval v. Duval, 114 N.H. 422, 425-26, 322 A.2d 1 (1974). Contra, Tetro v.

Opposition Brief — Charles Russell Rhines, Petitioner v. Darin Young, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Mar 13, 2019

SECOND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND, Docket 399, Rhines Appendix at 9, 10. … SECOND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND, Docket 399, Rhines Appendix at 16.

Petitioners Brief — Washington v. Recuenco

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2006

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52-53 (1970) (admission of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment); Coleman v. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 10-11 (1970) (denial of counsel at a preliminary hearing in violation of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause); Harrington v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines, Inc. v. North American Airlines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1956

Real Products Corp., 90 F.2d 617 24 Federal Trade Com%nission v. Ruberoid Co,, 3483 U.S. 470... -17 Calter v. Federal Trade Commission, 186 ee OO aca eens 24 Gimbel Bros. v. … Rev. 399, 404 (1940)...

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Illinois, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 10, 2025

Act of May 27, 1908, ch. 204, § 3, 35 Stat. 399, 400 (emphasis added). … Coakley, supra, in The Use of Troops in Civil Disturbances at 24.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Eli Lilly and Company, Petitioner v. United States, et al., ex. rel., Ronald J. Streck

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 24, 2026

Rev. 399 (2009) ................................. 14 John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (Thomas Hollis ed., London, 1764) (1689).............. 8 Letter from A Farmer, II, Balt. Md. … Rev. 399, 404–06 (2009). Or take the Sedition Act, which criminalized “false, scandalous, and malicious” statements against the government.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013

Page, 6 F.2d 399 i: HEE ibiiiiispitduiuaaigosammamsnabentapleiihcanauasen 16 Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. … Beginning in the early 1900s, this Court repeatedly held that the AIA was “inapplicable” in “extra- Supp. 395, 399 (W.D.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 5, 2025

Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 404 (2012). … Code Ann. § 39-24-30(a); S.D. Codified Laws § 3611-46.1; Utah Code Ann. § 58-17b-605(2)(a); Va. Code Ann. § 54.1-3408.03(A); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-24-148.

Opinion — Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1931

Sharp, 208 Fed. 399, Galbraith v. Robson-Hilliard Grocery Coa. 216 Fed. St2. … Raylor, 1 Fed. (24) 24. In re Southern Florida Corporation, G1 Fed. (24) 171. In re Gillette, 18 Ped. (2d) 687, EP rere ee i re OR a AID . ee . = 4 Isaacs vs.

Reply Brief — Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hodder

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989

App. 1986), rev'd, 399 N.W. 2d 77 (Minn. 1987) .... 9 Clay v. Clay, 397 N.W. 2d 571 (Minn. App. 1987) ...i+2+s00cdassecsccekahedssadiltlaasamaneaenneaoneenete 6 Comstock v. … App. 1986), rev'd, 399 N.W. 2d 77 (Minn 1987). Of these five cases, which are otherwise distin- guishable from the case at bar on multiple grounds, only one—Gruc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.

Record and brief — Clark v. Payne

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1981

Holmes 399 ¥ 2d. 495, 500 (Sth Cir. 1968), (emphasis added). … Holmes 399 F i2 2d 495, 500 (Sth Cir. 1968). Yet in 1981 this law is not adhered to as precedent for the Fifth Circuit when they stand in judgment of one of their potential peers.

Reply Brief — Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1995

Bowen, 485 U.S. 399 (1988) .... 4 Good Samaritan Hosp. v. Shalala, 113 8. … Bowen, 485 U.S. 399, 400-401 (1988). It is based on “the actual cost of services furnished to beneficiaries during the year.” 42 C.F.R. 413.9(b) (emphasis added).

Imported Fire Ant; Additions to the List of Quarantined Areas

Federal Register · Rule · Oct 25, 2007

We will consider all comments that we receive on or before December 24, 2007. … E7-21003 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-34-P

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Keene v. Jackson County

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1971

Rush, 46 NJ 399, 217 A2d 441 (1966) .............. 13 United States v. Dillon (USCA 9 Cir., 1965), 346 F 2d 633; 7 Am. … Rush, 46 NJ 399, 217 A2d 441 (1966); Dan v.

Jurisdictional Statement — George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1968

Broderick ........ 20 New York Public Authorities Law §§2601-3 ....... 24 II TABLE OF AUTHORITIES’ - PAGE Cases:. fad | Adler v. … S. 399, 2 _L. ed 2d 1414, 78 S. Ct. 1317 (1958) (public school teacher), Lerner v. Casey, 357 U. S. 468, 2 L: ed. 2d 1423, 78 8. Ct. 1311 * The opinion in Gardner v.

Reply Brief — Jim Feehan, Petitioner v. Rick Marcone, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 7, 2019

Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23, 30, 34, 89 S.Ct. 5, 21 L.Ed.2d 24 (1968).... … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006); Bush v.

Reply Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Texas, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 29, 2021

Balkin, Abortion and Original Meaning, 24 Const. Comment. 291 (2007) ..................................... 10 Paul M. … Balkin, Abortion and Original Meaning, 24 Const.

Reply Brief — Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 2, 2025

No. 24-889 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________ HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC. AND HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC, PETITIONERS v. … Opp. 24, 33. Any such knowledge does not result from Hikma’s actions; it results from Amarin promoting its own product.

Opposition Brief — Batson v. Kentucky

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

F. 24 499 (1979), There is also the opinion of a lower appellate court in Illinois, People x. Payne, 106 III. App. 34 1034, 436 N. 6. 24 1046 (Ist Dist. 1982). [See PEOPLE V. … 32 DePaul Law Review page 399-451) The Petitione has cited one federal circuit court opinion, McCray v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pollio v. New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988

Florida, [399 U.S. 78, 99-100, 90 S.Ct. 1893, 1905, 26 L.Ed.2d 446, 459-60 (1970)}. … [821 N.W.2d at 223-24]. In Bulls v. United States, 490 A.2d 197 (D.C.