Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Sears

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020

I'll clean this up for all our listeners at home. He said, I ain't doing S, leave me the F alone. He turned his side away from the flashlight and then he ran. … What about nearly stopping, the act of stopping? Again, that's Valentine right on point and Smith.

Oral argument — USAv5Unlabeled Boxes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

In other words, a de novo proceeding, in any context, whether it's under DSHEA or in any context, the court isn't ever really writing on a clean slate. … So it used its food additive authority under Section 348 of the Act.

Oral argument — Macfarlanv.Ivy Hill SNFLLcetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2012

That restriction was not lifted until some later period. … Weinstein's comments, to stay directly on point with what is at issue in this case, first, he mentioned that judicial estoppel is not applicable in this case.

Oral argument — Hope v. Warden York Cty Prison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2020

We made recent changes that we flagged about how staff, contractors, and the like, cleaning, masks, all these different sorts of things that the district court, of course, couldn't account for. … What is your comment with respect to those two items? Sure, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Securities v. Gentile

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2018

Ultimately, it's Congress's prerogative to set forth a limitation period, Your Honor. … The Exchange Act, the Court of Awareness back in 1934, this has always been understood to be an equitable remedy.

Oral argument — United States v. Senke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2020

Sinke was convicted did not require a sexual act, only the intent to perform that sexual act, and when Mr. Sinke was apprehended, he had condoms and lubricant. I understand that. … So why shouldn't this be subject to a proper airing at an evidentiary hearing rather than our reversing based on his word for it?

Oral argument — Young v. Pleasant Vallet

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2014

I'm not suggesting that this teacher may not have crossed the line periodically. I'm not suggesting that. … Holding a school district liable for comments made by unknown individuals on Internet blogs...

Oral argument — 23-1290_23-1299_NLRB v. Colart_Staff Mgmt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2024

Why isn't the significance of cases like Starbucks or Lancaster-Fairfield County Hospital, or the Fourth Circuit's decision in LRB versus air contact transport, that there is a different standard for the … What do we do with the board's footnote five where it indicates, even if Hargrove was not actually engaged in constricted activity, that Colart apparently thought that he was and that Trejo's comments

Oral argument — Smith v. Navient Solutions

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2020

Or if we said, you know, an actor in acting or dancing for the pleasure of the crowd, the acting just naturally goes with the dancing. … No, I think I wanted to just address briefly this idea of the consent exception and just make a couple comments about that.

Oral argument — Veliusv.Townshipof Hamilton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2011

So Farrar was a de minimis case, period. Correct. There was no reason for the majority to go that far because they said it's de minimis. … Just the whole way the case went down, there were two discrete acts of excessive force. Does that make it an unusual case?

Oral argument — Real Alternatives Inc v. Secretary Dept of Healthand Human Services,etal.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2016

But are you really suggesting that an employee- and I'm just picking a name out of the air. … The comment period was 68, so it closed at the end of September. The departments received 54,000 comments, which are in the process of being approved.

Oral argument — In Re Nortel Networks Incetal Part1

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2011

Pension Act. … Now, if I could just get to a couple of questions or comments that have been raised, and obviously answer anything you have that you want to ask me.

Oral argument — Chheng V.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

And I think it's something that can only be commented upon by an expert in an informed... … We're not going to pick that virus-diseased kidney over a clean kidney.

Oral argument — Herrera v. Agents_of_Pennsylvania

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2025

What about the exhaustion period? Wouldn't that also toll the time? I think the exhaustion period would also toll the time. From the limited record we have on appeal, because Mr. … And that's because the plaintiff agrees—I guess the plaintiff in the Civil Rights Act context would agree that what is— there's no dispute about what the sentence actually is? Correct.

Oral argument — In Re Milton Thomas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026

It operates as an injunction against commencement, continuation, and inaction or employment of process act to collect of such debt as personal liability of the debtor, whether it is waived or not discharged … And is it fair to have the City be put on notice in a period where 16 days are remaining for a response to be filed and then a further 16 days for a hearing to send a notice to a building?

Oral argument — David Mulholland,etal V.Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Inc,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

I don't know the answer as a lay person, and I think it's something that can only be commented upon by an expert in an informed case. … Your Honor, the Affidavit of Merit statute did any action for damages for personal injuries, wrongful death, or property damage resulting from an alleged act of malpractice or negligence by a licensed

Oral argument — Huertas v. Bayer US

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2024

Building on Judge Ambrose's earlier comment question, if there were standing as to four plaintiffs, it seems that the district court only made rulings regarding the 12B1 claims. … Bayer can't just wipe its hands clean and say, you know, this is all on you, not on us.

Oral argument — United States v. Nucera Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2022

Not every offhand comment will suffice. … I thought your argument was we at least deserve the hearing where these things could be aired, because it's conceivable that at that hearing where these things are aired and 606 isn't blocking the court

Oral argument — United States v. Ozcelik

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Let me piggyback on to Judge Slaughter's comment and question. … Well, with his hands in the air. Well, I mean, the implication is get out of here, skidoo, I guess.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Sec US Dept Homeland Security.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

As soon as the earthquake gets cleaned up, if we send people back right away, it might be different. … And so it doesn't cure the prior period that he was not in lawful status. He entered the United States in 1997.