Documents

Oral argument — Endo Pharmaceuticals Solutions v. Custopharm Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

However, in the Shearing case, established that that recognition does not have to occur during the prior art period. … This court, I believe, has rejected on several occasions the idea that the recognition had to occur during the prior art period.

Oral argument — Buford v. Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

I think fundamentally, though, I don't think the admissions that you think you got are quite as clean as you're describing them. I feel like Chief Judge Gore explained one medium. … Because they didn't just propose, order him to take a direct examination based on that one comment.

Oral argument — Sipe v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2009

During the time period when this was going on, U.S. Ambassador Baker flew through. His helicopter was fueled using this refueler, and the fuel bladder burst. That's in the record. … Every problem started after the July air conditioner incident. The July air conditioner is the crux where things started going forward. The air conditioner was erroneously put in. Mr.

Oral argument — Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2019

So you're acting as though this property was worth $37 million. But what did Waverly purchase this property for? Waverly and its predecessor... … Yes, there's a pilot project where the Army is going to be testing a couple methods for cleaning this site up.

Oral argument — Immersion Corporation v. HTC Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2016

And what HTC is suggesting is that the Congress in Section 120, sub salientio, overturned a century of settled Patent Act practice without any comment or without anyone noticing. … the 52 Act and after the 52 Act, sprang from the Supreme Court's decision in Godfrey v.

Oral argument — In Re Kite

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2010

And as a result, in a very simply short period of time... … Any comment? I tried to comment on that in the brief. I acknowledge it is a little bit confusing.

Oral argument — Shields v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2016

And then it goes on to say there are four types of evidence right here in comment B. Can I just ask? Yeah. … And so the government wanted a clean slate here. So when it finally reached a settlement with the Covell plaintiffs, it wrote broad releases, and those releases clearly encompassed the claims Ms.

Oral argument — Fuji America v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2008

All of these are not motorized feeding, and that is a function of the feeder's initial period. Now, it's a different situation if you're considering other types of feeders. … There, the carburetor is feeding air and fuel to the engine, and it's inseparable from the operation of the engine because the engine can't operate without this carburetor attached to it.

Oral argument — Wilson v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2015

In that notice, the agency stated that she exercised poor judgment, acted unprofessionally on many occasions, and humiliated subordinate employees occasionally by making comments or yelling. … Wilson had not waived her hearing, she would have had an opportunity to have all these issues aired at the hearing.

Oral argument — AROJURAYE v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2011

sort of estoppel arose because of – let's assume it was a mistake, apparently it's would be entitled to consider whether or not the SCEP requirements were complied with, or is your theory that it's a clean … But the Civil Service Reform Act gives the Board jurisdiction over some matters and not others. And I just don't believe there's a jurisdiction at the Board to hear this matter. Okay.

Oral argument — Liqwd, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2021

But here, the transfer did not occur before the injunction, but the relevant time period is transfer before final judgment. … You have to prove each infringing act that you claim resulted in a lost sale.

Oral argument — POWER INTEGRATIONS v. FAIRCHILD SEMI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

I'm going to eliminate the calculation because you can't recover for foreign acts of infringement. … Well, you did it after discovery, number one, and number two, you did it after the infringement period, right? Not after the infringement period. The infringement period continued.

Oral argument — Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. Schiedmayer Celesta GmbH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2021

So this whole statutory scheme has to be clean. … Yeah, I would like to make a few comments. Thank you. Sure. I do have just a couple of comments. I'll deal with responses to Utrecht first.

Oral argument — Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026

That's because the bulk solution itself is not clean. You can use whatever you want, high temperature, low temperature. … At some period, you freeze-dried it, and you get a powder. Later, you have the little powder in a vial. You add some kind of...

Oral argument — K-TECH v. DIRECTV

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2013

So it says, it says, the over-the-air broadcasters must do that. The over-the-air broadcasters, not Time Warner Cable, must assign major channel numbers and minor channel numbers. … It very clearly spells out what the invention is, that CBS and ABC and the over-the-air broadcasters have to do it because they broadcast over-the-air.

Oral argument — Carter v. ALK Holdings

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2010

I don't understand what the significance of that comment is by Judge Camp. … It's exactly the same situation in the air pressure case.

Oral argument — K-TECH v. TIME WARNER

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2013

So it says, it says, the over-the-air broadcasters must do that. The over-the-air broadcasters, not Time Warner Cable, must assign major channel numbers and minor channel numbers. … It very clearly spells out what the invention is, that CBS and ABC and the over-the-air broadcasters have to do it because they broadcast over-the-air.

Oral argument — TR International Trading v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2021

In this case, however, Customs sort of acted as judge, jury, and executioner. … I would point out that if you can't rush a liquidation in the time period, customs will always have the ability.

Oral argument — Specialized Bicycle Components v. K.G. Motors, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2016

They had 43% compound growth over the period that we're looking at. … And we have the fact that NoTubes had 37, sometimes as much as 45 times greater sales in the same period.

Oral argument — In Re Seagate Technology

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2007

period, throughout the course of... or the duration of the reliance. … Now, in our case, we think presents a very clean set of facts for you to decide this.