Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.11s
Motion to Dismiss — Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Gulf Coast Rice Mills
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1963
Lexington Mill % Elevator Co., 232 U.S. 399. … Lexington Mill &% Flevator Co., 232 U.S. 399.
375 U.S. 57Brief for Respondent — Colgrove v. Battin
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1973
C 733, 24 L.Ed2d 729 11 Williams v. State of Florida, June 22, 1970, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.Ct. 1893, L.Ed.2d 446 .. 3, 12, 15 CIRCUIT COURT CASES „ Matezak, 3rd C. … Ot. 733, 24 L.Ed.2d 729).
413 U.S. 149Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
392-24-? … Spranger, Herman A. 398-24-5047 394-09-1532 394-09-2570 396-38-9827 395-32-8692 399-46-7269 396-40-9226 391-54-2936 387018-2752 387-34-2400 393-03-4045 393-03-3904 399-34-4491 397-38-7292
419 U.S. 870Appellees Brief — Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. Gibbons
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1982
No. 96-254, 94 Stat. 399, as amended by the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, Pub. L. … Sec- tion 102, 94 Stat. 399 (to be codified at 45 U.S.C. 1001).
455 U.S. 457Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hill v. Virginia (No. 06-1394)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
Com., 47 Va.App. 442, 450, 624 S.E.2d 666, 670 (2006), 1, 7, 8, 24, 24 47 Va.App. 442, 451, 624 S.E.2d 666, 671 (2006), 25 47 Va.App. 442, 452, 624 S.E.2d 666, 671 (2006), 11, 24 47 Va.App. 442, … Code sec. 3.1-399.
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 20, 2024
Acceptance Date: November 14, 2024; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3035.105, and 39 CFR 3041.310; Public Representative: Jennaca Upperman; Comments Due: November 22, 2024. 24 … [FR Doc. 2024-27126 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
89 FR 91807Postal Regulatory CommissionRespondents Brief — Herring v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975
E. 2d 164, 399 Til. 132 (1948) Singer v. United States, 380 U. S. 24 Smith v. United States, 360 U. S. 1 West v. United States, 399 F. 2d 467 (5th Cir., 1968), cert. denied 393 U. … United States, 399 F. 2d 467, 470 (5th Cir., 1968), cert. denied 393 U.
422 U.S. 853Transcript of Record — Brown Shoe Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1962
__ -.... sso 23 443 399 4333 ‘ 334433. 23 430 399 2506 rEtt+ +4 D. … VENDOR RETAIL PRICE MET PAIRS TOTAL NOs NOs PER PAIR SHIPPED NET COST 23 “~ £e ey eTOT j =a es, 6 16064 23 24 399 2 516 ; 6° 2120 ° = Sa >} rs 5799 23 30 399 $052 1212240 5075 e 1216035 .¢ 23 32
370 U.S. 294Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 3, 2002
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary 14 CFR Parts 121, 207, 208, 221, 250, 253, 256, 302, 380, 389, and 399 49 CFR Parts 27, 37, 40, 219, 376, 382, 653, and 654 [Docket No. … Issued in Washington, DC on September 24, 2002. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of Transportation. [FR Doc. 02-25189 Filed 10-2-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
67 FR 61996Transportation DepartmentOffice of the SecretaryOpposition Brief — California Federal Bank v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
United States, 399 F.5d 1541 (2005). … Opp. 24, 14-15.
546 U.S. 817Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 10, 2024
Tr. of Oral Arg. at 24:10-14. … Mem. at 21-24; Pls. Reply at 9-10.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Richard Schorovsky, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 26, 2024
Stitt, 139 S.Ct. 399 (2018), the Supreme Court 1 Shepard v. … Stitt, 586 U.S. __, 139 S.Ct. 399 (2018). In United States v.
Opposition Brief — Barbour v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 102-03 (1970). 24 CONCLUSION For nearly forty years, States have relied on the clear result of this Court’s decision in Apodaca: Jury verdicts in State criminal proceedings need
562 U.S. 1217Airworthiness Directives; Engine Alliance Turbofan Engines
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 8, 2018
We must receive comments on this AD by December 24, 2018. … (ii) EA Service Bulletin EAGP7-72-399, dated June 4, 2018.
83 FR 55816Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationAppellees Brief — Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1974
forfeiture”. 24 LPRA Sec. 2512 (a) (4). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970).
416 U.S. 663Reply Brief — William C. McGee, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 12, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020) ................................... 1, 2, 6 United States v. Stitt, 139 S. … See Gary Pet. pg. 24 (arguing that the holding of Gary is “likely” to impact jury trials).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — David Lesh, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 13, 2024
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970).................................. 2, 7, 24, 29 Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).......................................... 4, 24 Blanton v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — BBF Liquidating, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
Code of Civil Procedure, § § 22; 24 ceemeemiaee 22 -_ (al. Corp. Code, § 5012 en : me Bek cheat 13 Cal, Corp. Code, § 5400 nejcceneen-n6, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 24 _ Cal. Corp. … In view of the fact that Section 399 and Section 5400 were both enacty(!
405 U.S. 1065Reply Brief — Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) was relied upon as authority, which case preserved the “nature of the offense” test. Baldwin, 399 U.S. at 69, n.6. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 74 n.22 (1970).
489 U.S. 538Reply Brief — Pablo Santana Arellano, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 9, 2024
Brown, 399 S.E.2d 593, 594 (S.C. 1991). See United States v. Arellano, No. 23-10199, 2024 WL 1156535, at *1 (5th Cir. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994), Andersen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976), Lakeside v. Oregon, 435 U.S. 333 (1978), and Baldwin v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.