Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.26s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2023
Circuit vacated the EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule regulating nitrogen oxide (NOx) and sulfur dioxide (SO2). … Assoc.’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 891 F.3d 1041 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C … ARGUMENT Section 202(a\(1) of the Clean Air Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 7521(a)(1), directs the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to prescribe by regulation “standards applicable
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982).......11 STATUTES Clean Air Act, Pub. L. No. 91-604, 84 Stat. 1676 (1970), as amended by Act of Nov 15, 1990, Pub. L. … "In stressing that the Clean Air Act was the model for the citizen suit 17 once, Sea Middlesex, 453 U.S. at 17-18 n.27; Gwaltney, 484 U.S. at 62, the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — Vista Paint Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Accordingly, EL RAP’s members have a strong interest in resolving the important question, on which the circuits are split, of whether Section 307(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) may be interpreted … [short time] limitation on judicial review imposed by the Clean Air Act would afford precari- ously little time for many affected persons even if some adequate method of notice were afforded.
525 U.S. 816Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 30, 2021
Auto Innovators’ members rely on the regulatory certainty provided by the Clean Air Act to implement routine, model-wide updates to vehicles in production and in the field. … The Clean Air Act (“CAA”) gives EPA exclusive authority to regulate these updates.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Sierra Club, 463 U.S. 680, 684 (1983) (Clean Air Act). … Most recently, it was applied to this case arising under the Clean Water Act.
528 U.S. 167Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Section 307(e) provides that nothing in the Clean Air Act authorizes judicial review of EPA regulations or orders, except as provided in §307. 42 U.S.C. §7607(e). … The Clean Air Act expressly exempts enumerated regulations and other final agency action from the APA, 42 U.S.C. §7607(d)(1) (“provisions of section 553 through 557 and section 706 of title 5 shall
549 U.S. 561Amicus Curiae Brief — Soundboard Association, Petitioner v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 2, 2019
An agency “acts” when it implements, interprets, or prescribes law or policy. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. EPA, 801 F.2d 430, 435 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (citing Nat’l Automatic Laundry & Cleaning Council v. … The rule, promulgated after a period of notice and comment, “purport[ed] to give an authoritative interpretation of a statutory provision that [had] a direct effect on the day to day business of [the regulated
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
TREATING ALL STATE LAW CLAIMS RELATING TO ENERGY PRODUCTS AS THE FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENT OF EMISSIONS REGULATION UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT WOULD JEOPARDIZE A BODY OF LAW THAT HAS SERVED, RATHER THAN DISSERVED … Third, treating deception and productionbased claims as functionally equivalent, for preemption purposes, to regulation of emissions and other pollutants under the Clean Air Act would prove far too much
Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019
After a formal notice and comment period, EPA issued final rules codifying its interpretation of the Clean Air Act, see id. at 310-13, and the question While EPA recently issued an “Interpretive Statement … In any event, unlike the Clean Air Act provisions at issue in UARG, the relevant text of the CWA is far from ambiguous.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2025
Morss, Clean Air Act Handbook: A Practical Guide to Compliance § 5:38 (33d ed. 2023) .................................................... 26 Exec. Order 14037, 86 Fed. … Air Act preemption waiver for California’s Advanced Clean Cars I program.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Air Act. … This program is therefore a prime example of “cooperative federalism” under the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2024
Air Act Amendments of 1970, Pub. … The Clean Air Act’s venue provision makes clear that courts review disapprovals, not the rules in which they are contained.
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
See 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment Summary, EPA, https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/1990clean-air-act-amendment-summary (last visited Dec. 20, 2021).These constitutional considerations reinforce … Simply put, the text and structure of the Clean Air Act in general, and section 111 in particular, do not permit “system” to be read as the D.C. Circuit did.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
The Ninth Circuit Failed To Defer To EPA’s Reasonable Interpretation Of The Clean Water Act 1. … Protection Agency intended to exempt most silvicultural activities from the Clean Water Acts permit requirements.”
568 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 1, 2024
Air Act Amendments of 1970, Pub. … The Clean Air Act’s venue provision makes clear that courts review disapprovals, not the rules in which they are contained.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bowen v. Georgetown Univ. Hospital
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
5, 7, 15 Sy I UD I si nssdecessemapeneeiseenens 15 5 U.S.C. § 553(d) (1982) ...................... cea 16, 17 The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq … Air Act requirements at its Kammer Plant.”
488 U.S. 204Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
Congress does not preserve remedies it means to destroy.5 The Clean Air Act’s effect was to displace the federal common law 4 Congress thereby demonstrated that if it had intended the Clean Air Act to … Having held only that the Clean Air Act displaced federal common law, American Electric Power Co. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Carlota Copper Co. v. Friends of Pinto Creek (No. 07-1524)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Reg. 55524 (December 1976) (1976 EPA “interpretive ruling” endorsing the use of offsets to allow permitting of new air pollution sources in nonattaining areas under the Clean Air Act); Clean Air Act … § 7503(c) (2008) (allowing offsets under the Clean Air Act permit program); America’s Climate Security Act of 2007, S. 1291, 110” Cong. §§ 2401-2411 (2007) (featuring offsets to address greenhouse
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
First, Calpine agrees with the petitioners that the clear and straightforward language of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) provides the U.S. … Reilly, 893 F.2d 901, 909-10 (7" Cir. 1990) (“{Ijn passing the Clean Air Act Amendments, Congress intended to stimulate the advancement of pollution control technology.”); Husqvarna v.
549 U.S. 497
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.