Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.40s
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 16, 2025
Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. … Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or • Send an email to rule-comments
90 FR 58322Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jun 22, 2011
The proposed rule change was published in the Federal Register on May 12, 2011. 3 The Commission received one comment letter on the proposal. 4 Phlx submitted a comment response letter on … Comment Letter One commenter raised an objection to the proposal. 10 The commenter questioned the ability of a floor-based exchange to verify that there is not a customer order on the book at the
76 FR 36606Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 23, 2016
The commenter also noted that correcting mismatched records would be resource intensive and requested a grace period for compliance. … Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or • Send an email to rule-comments
81 FR 9043Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Oct 16, 2020
, or advance notice is consistent with the Act. … Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or • Send an email to rule-comments
85 FR 65891Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · May 19, 2021
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on April 13, 2021. 3 The Commission did not receive comments on the proposed rule change. … ICC also proposes to specify that the Risk Department may use discretion to update collateral asset haircuts during periods of extreme market stress, and specifically during periods when collateral assets
86 FR 27136Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 25, 2004
For purposes of calculating the 60-day abrogation period, the Commission considers the period to have commenced on February 11, 2004, the date the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1. 4 15 U.S.C. … the Act.
69 FR 8721Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Oct 29, 2012
Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. … rule-comments@sec.gov .
77 FR 65596Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 10, 1998
The Commission will publish a new notice if the effective date is delayed to review comments, or if changes are made based on comments received. … Hall, Privacy Act Officer (202) 942-4320, Office of Filings and Information Services, Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Operations, Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 6432
63 FR 37423Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jun 12, 2015
The Exchange also proposes to take this opportunity to clean up and stream line this subparagraph (a)(2) to Rule 24.9. … Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
80 FR 33574Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 27, 2012
Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. … Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's Internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or • Send an email to rule-comments
77 FR 44294Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Apr 29, 2026
Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed clarifying clean-up and corresponding numbering changes are consistent with the Act because they make the Exchange's Rules more clear and understandable … Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or • Send an email to rule-comments
91 FR 23128Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Mar 13, 2006
Commission received no comment letters regarding the proposal. … The Exchange now proposes to delete the language in ISE Rule 803(c)(1) as a purely non-substantive clean-up of the ISE Rules. 9 See Exchange Act Release No. 50211 (August 18, 2004), 69 FR
71 FR 12758Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Nov 1, 2002
• Finally, the ISE proposes two technical “clean up” changes to its rules. … Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
67 FR 66693Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jul 27, 2012
Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. … rule-comments@sec.gov .
77 FR 44302Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 6, 2007
Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. … rule-comments@sec.gov.
72 FR 5469Securities and Exchange CommissionFacilitating Shareholder Director Nominations
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 16, 2010
the public comment file at or following the close of the original comment period. … Although many commenters supported the proposed one-year holding period, 290 the majority of commenters suggested a holding period longer than the proposed one-year period, with many recommending
75 FR 56668Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Feb 10, 2004
On June 9, 2003, the proposed rule change, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, was published for comment in the Federal Register . 5 The Commission received no comments on the proposed rule … This is a technical amendment and is not subject to notice and comment. II.
69 FR 6354Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jun 17, 2011
Comment Letters Four commenters raised objections to the proposal. 10 One commenter expressed the concern that the QCC Order would prohibit potential price improvement because such order may trade … The Commission believes that the proposed rule change, which would permit a clean cross of the options leg of a subset of qualified contingent trades, is appropriate and consistent with the Act. 24
76 FR 35491Securities and Exchange CommissionModernization of Oil and Gas Reporting
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 14, 2009
Comment Date: Comments on the Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis should be received on or before February 13, 2009. … Four commenters supported the proposed January 1, 2010 compliance date of Securities Act filings and Exchange Act filings related to fiscal periods ending on or after December 31, 2009. 320 However
74 FR 2158Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Mar 10, 2015
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder 2 notice is hereby given that on February 20, 2015, The Options Clearing Corporation … Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
80 FR 12652Securities and Exchange Commission
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.