Documents

Oral argument — Breakironv.Horn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2010

Why wouldn't you want to go back and do the clean slate trial when you already have to go back anyway for the murder trial? … We don't know whether he heard the comment. It could have been a matter of he wasn't paying attention.

Oral argument — In Re Niaspan Antittrust Litigation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2022

And that's why comments like Kraft's comment that, oh, this would just cost $250,000 were kind of laughable. Right? … I act as an ASO. I also act as an insurer. I get notice of the class as no one's disputing or sending notice through a different database.

Oral argument — Chemours Co FCLL C v. US Prot Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2024

Seemingly, they may be referring to the Clean Water Act permit that North Carolina issued. But in their briefs, and I think here, too, they've disclaimed reliance on that for purposes of standing. … And if this is final agency action, then it's a substantive final agency action that has to go through notice and comment.

Oral argument — Williams v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2026

But let's assume that it's clean, pure as the driven snow. Does the fact that he has a 20-year-old DUI make him dangerous? I think it very well might. … And we know there's going to be 90 days for comment. What the final rule will look like after those comments, anyone's guess. I mean, but from your argument, it sounds like no one can use 925C.

Oral argument — Kirtz v. Trans Union LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2022

They're all part of the same Consumer Credit Protection Act. So Congress, when it wanted to create exceptions, knew how to do that during that time period. … Did it expose the United States states or government agencies to those criminal or that whole series of provisions, including period?

Oral argument — Tiene v. Law Office of J Scott Watson P C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

And they did halt collections for that period of time, that there was supposed to be a meeting. … It's just wipe the slate clean and start all over to say that you get issue preclusion effect based on that. Especially when the court said that I don't see any intentional misconduct.

Oral argument — Parejav.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2010

They cited one Seventh Circuit case, Cortez-Castillo, which also didn't itself cite any BIA precedents from that criminal period. … It's very hard, because the common law always said when you act illegally, you can't get anything out of it, but they come to the United States, act illegally, have the child, and now say, well, we ought

Oral argument — Nautilus Insurance Co. v. 200Christian Stret Partners LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2020

When you talk about the air conditioner, you're talking about a problem with the air conditioner, but they're not alleging any property damage resulting from that. … And I don't think there is an allegation of a plaintiff that has standing to for bodily injury that actually occurred during the policy period, even if there was. Got it.

Oral argument — The Estate of John R.H Thouron v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2014

And it could have been paid over a 10-year period. No doubt about that. So all of those were unanswered questions. … By analogy to this case, how to interpret 6166 in the final moments before November 6th was something that was up in the air. They weren't quite sure how to deal with it.

Oral argument — Langbord v. US Dept Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

commentators who said you have to apply 805. … I am reminded of my teenagers when they say we cleaned our room and their actions reflect the exact opposite.

Oral argument — Fahie v. People of VI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2016

We want to put this person up and make them as clean as possible. So there'll be an accessory after the fact. … Caddy has said, you pursued a fact FOIA was, uh, acting, uh, uh, on his own at the time the crime was committed.

Oral argument — United States v. Ottaviano

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2013

186 and that's in a context suppression where there's an absolute waiver rule it's not just forfeiture it's waiver here we're saying it's forfeiture that should apply the standard here should be plain air … that what matters is that justice is done actually there's more than that the supreme court's made clear um that justice must act well must also satisfy the appearance of justice and appearances matter

Oral argument — April Hankins v. Philadelphia Contributionship Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

Her reasonable interpretation based on being there, being next to the comments as they were being made, is this is what needed to be done. … In that case, for example, the adjuster says, why don't you get a scraper and scrape all this mold off just to help clean it up to the homeowner.

Oral argument — committievpricewaterhousecoopers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It's really, in one sense, when you think about it, don't you really go back to Judge Posner's comments in Senko? … And you heard my comment that I don't want to screw up responding and superior laws.

Oral argument — Greenberg v. Lehocky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2023

said that don't constitute severe and pervasive and you don't want lawyers saying that much less judges but in terms of your judicial ethics and all 46 46 states there is no severe pervasive requirement period … niffler said niffler wouldn't have said if that were the test niffler couldn't have said that there was a requirement to preserve an uninhibited marketplace of ideas in which professionals can freely air

Oral argument — Zachary Greenbergv.JerryM.Lehocky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2023

But in terms of your judicial ethics and all 46 states, there is no severe or pervasive requirement, period. … It does include CLE, which is where I really want to spend most of my time and make most of my comments.

Oral argument — Paulv.Hovensa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2013

For every discreet act, the clock begins at the act, and that's it. That's the rule. … It involved a plaintiff who was trying to litigate old and state claims that occurred outside of the 300-day time period.

Oral argument — Windt v. Qwest Comm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The judge made a fundamental mistake both as to the existence of the proceedings that he commented on because he was dead wrong about that in terms of judging. … Well, actually, it's an important question because, of course, Judge Brown, Judge Brown was aired on the side of caution and assumed that the case would improve the RICO for precisely that reason.

Oral argument — RBallv.Commissioner IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2013

And the failure to recognize it for a period of time doesn't make it not income. So what's wrong with that reasoning? … So Congress cleaned up 108 after Gitlet's and I think understood that it was taking care of Gitlet's because it was always understood as providing this narrow sort of loophole.

Oral argument — United States v. Edwards

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

run or have already run for considerable periods of time? … And therefore, there is this air of an unusual sequence of events in the listing of hearings.