Documents

Oral argument — AVENTIS PHARMA v. HOSPIRA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2012

If we assume that the references meet the but-for test, what's your reaction or what comments do you have with respect to intent? … So now moving on to – I want to address the inequitable comments, because there's some questions from – Well, can I ask about inequitable conduct then?

Oral argument — Brodowy v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2007

Because the GS system was still in effect for all the air traffic controllers. That's how they were paid. … I mean, in other words, if I come in and I say, I am entitled to be paid under the Magistrates' Special Benefits Act, because in a loose sense, I'm a magistrate, even though I'm a court of appeals judge

Oral argument — STERN v. SEQUAL TECH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012

What we are pointing out is that making and selling an invention or a product is an act of infringement. You don't have to actually use it. … The counterclaim deals with just a discrete period of time. It does, and we disagreed with whether the patent had been properly reinstated.

Oral argument — Parra v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2017

The arbitrator, I wanted to point out, in his decision, he specifically credits the testimony of the deputy chief who's acting as the acting chief, Huffman, that keeping her on administrative duties would … For that period of time, she was restricted to administrative duties.

Oral argument — ProMOS Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2020

One, patentee sets forth a definition or acts as his own lexicographer. Two, that there is a disclaimer. And they've conceded that there is no disclaimer. … He did on recross and redirect, he tried to clean up that testimony. But if you actually look at the entirety of that testimony, it will show that Mr.

Oral argument — STALLWORTH v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

But to the extent that they did, it was not, it was not air. This court has said over and over again that it's a substance of a regulation, a substance of a requirement. Mr. … Is it your comment that in the paragraph we've been discussing in Andino, there is italics, but not of the word certifies? The italicized portion is review of all the evidence.

Oral argument — Pina v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2008

Typically, our cases, you know, intolerable working condition cases show a pattern of improper conduct by the agency over a period of time. … But the charges were inappropriate conduct in how he acted on March 22nd, and the charge was threatening- That wasn't my question.

Oral argument — Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2019

What would preclude you from within that one-year period? Here's what you did. You filed a motion to expedite. It was denied. You then petitioned within the one-year period. … I always wanted the agency to have a way to clean up its act, and that's what we have. But it may be under some circumstances it just isn't available. I don't know.

Oral argument — Miller Mendel, Inc. v. City of Anna, Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

Paul versus, is it Bel-Air? I tried to write that down. Yes, Bel-Air, Texas. You don't cite it in any of your briefs before this court. … Paul versus Bel-Air. No, no, Your Honor. Perhaps I just spoke at St. Paul Insurance Company of Bel-Air, Texas versus AFIA Worldwide Insurance. Okay.

Oral argument — United States Tsubaki v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

The American International Chemical at the CIT said, well, we think it's dictum, period. … They were trying to kind of clean house. International trading has considered a similar email when nothing has been communicated prior to Customs to be noticed that a suspension was removed.

Oral argument — Waverley View Investors, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2019

So you're acting as though this property was worth $37 million. But what did Waverly purchase this property for? Waverly and its predecessor... … Yes, there's a pilot project where the Army is going to be testing a couple methods for cleaning this site up.

Oral argument — Klingenschmitt v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015

You've got to remember, Chaplain Klingenschmitt was also an Air Force Academy graduate. He was a major in the Air Force. He was a qualified missile officer. … There were 80 written comments or there were written comments and 80% of those written comments, which certainly didn't come from the entirety of the crew, contain negative comments regarding Chaplain

Oral argument — Nystrom v. Trex Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2006

I'd also like to comment on, this is not a precedent problem. This court is not going to be overwhelmed with cases like this. … If this court had given us an opportunity, there was a year and a half period when our initial decision came out, to the time when Phillips was decided.

Oral argument — OPM v. Moulton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2025

OPM's internal instructions, which OPM chose not to submit into the record, even after being ordered to do so by the acting clerk of the board. You say those are in the record? … We haven't changed our position, so we don't need notice and comment, is basically what you're saying. I mean, I think that's right.

Oral argument — OPM v. Moulton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2025

OPM's internal instructions, which OPM chose not to submit into the record, even after being ordered to do so by the acting clerk of the board. You say those are in the record? Oh, sorry. … We haven't changed our position, so we don't need notice and comment is basically what you're saying. I think that's right.

Oral argument — Voda v. Cordis Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2008

That's his only comment about Faring, it's engaging with a curve. … In our opening brief at page 36, we describe our clean construction as requiring a second straight portion and not excluding additional curb contact.

Oral argument — Endo Pharmaceuticals Solutions v. Custopharm Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

However, in the Shearing case, established that that recognition does not have to occur during the prior art period. … This court, I believe, has rejected on several occasions the idea that the recognition had to occur during the prior art period.

Oral argument — Weststar Revivor v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2007

And the last page was denominated an air start demolition, and the table of contents of it was called. … What about in note 7 also, this comment just before the nominal slab size is 15 by 12 and a half feet, it says remove the concrete slab to extent of existing slab edges.

Oral argument — Ball Aerosol v. Limited Brands

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2008

And if you look at Wright, you see a dome bottom that has a void and that traps air there and acts to insulate the air and trap heat. Right, but there's plenty of prior art dealing with scorching. … And you have both trapped air in the little gap underneath it and then you've got air blowing underneath your air conditioning system.

Oral argument — Buford v. Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

I think fundamentally, though, I don't think the admissions that you think you got are quite as clean as you're describing them. I feel like Chief Judge Gore explained one medium. … Because they didn't just propose, order him to take a direct examination based on that one comment.