Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.72s
Oral argument — United States v. Mohammad Chaudhri
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2024
The government started its closing with a comment about a mom needing to make her husband happy, and the government said that set the tone for the next 14 years. … She had to remove them, take the nails out of them, take them outside, clean them, reinstall them. She had to take area carpets outside and clean them.
49 min of audioOral argument — Deborah Getz v. The Boeing Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2011
This is an engine that has been within the Army Air Force service, mostly the Air Force, excuse me, mostly the Army, but it goes back to the 50s with the Air Force and the various iterations of this engine … And before I close, I'd like to make one comment about CUI, and that is there is connectivity.
40 min of audioOral argument — Kymberli Gardner v. CLC of Pascagoula, L.L.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017
There was testimony from the witnesses that it didn't matter if you were black or white, that he would make comments to you and act inappropriately toward you. … J.S. began acting inappropriately toward Ms. Watkins.
41 min of audioOral argument — In the Matter of the Application of the County Collector
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2011
But I don't know why they said I waived it, and they also said I waived the request for a sale on air. Well, I wasn't requesting, really, a sale on air. They asked me if that was an option available. … Well, I guess, again, in the ideal world, a reversal with directions that can't issue a tax deed to a cellular phone tower, period.
35 min of audioOral argument — Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma v. Zeldin
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2026
So the Pawnee Nation has TAS authority for certain Clean Water Act programs on its land. It got that authority in 2004. … And the reason is that if we're talking about, let's say, a Clean Water Act 303B program, that's the same program regardless of whether EPA is requiring Oklahoma to take some additional steps in administering
34 min of audioOral argument — Soni v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2023
Subject to clear air review. Is that also correct? The fact aspects, of course, are subject to clear air review, yes. Now, there are two problems with those documents. … And it makes no sense, by the way, to send out a consent to extend the limitations period in 2006 when the limitations period isn't going to expire, as counsel said, until November of 2008.
25 min of audioOral argument — Resort Center Associates v. Regan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2023
At some point, is there never any jurisdiction when the EPA just fails to act over an inordinate period of time? … It's supposed to coordinate with the people who committed the CERCLA violations to clean it up.
30 min of audioOral argument — City of Santa Monica v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2016
When was, when were operations ceased on that property, air operations? Well the Santa Monica Airport is still an operating airport today, Your Honor. … If, as here, a claimant asserts fee title to disputed property, notice of a government claim that creates even a cloud on that title may be sufficient to trigger the limitations period.
43 min of audioOral argument — Kalkman v. Nedved
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013
The initial problem, in our view, with the trial judge, and again, he's writing or thinking on a clean slate because there really was no Illinois opinion on point. … In our act here, they don't say that.
28 min of audioOral argument — Darlene Yazzie v. Katie Hobbs
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2020
The district court judge sort of loaded more onto the Voting Rights Act, Section 2, and is there. The language of the act is clear. The case law that we've cited in our brief is clear. … But that process requires, just like normal rulemaking, a period of time where they put the elections procedure manual out for comment.
41 min of audioOral argument — Republic of Argentina v. AWG Group Ltd
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2017
They weren't even a party to the claim, and they were purporting to make comments on Argentina's challenge. And she adopted that. She didn't say, well, OK, can you tell me more? … And that is, what's the status of the water supply and so forth in Buenos Aires? I mean, that seems to be a pretty important project.
31 min of audioOral argument — Western Watersheds Project v. David Bernhardt
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021
It's not in this case, the public comment period is the period that matters, not the protest period. … And so, the defect then was the shortened comment period, correct? It was a defect in the comment period for September 2018 because they added all these in at the very last minute.
67 min of audioOral argument — Yaw v. Delaware River Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2022
Could you comment on that? So that was the holding, I assume this is... District Court. What's that? District Court holding. Oh, the District Court's holding. … The public natural resources are to be conserved and maintained for the benefit of all the people, including future generations, who have the right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of
57 min of audioOral argument — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. ITC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014
But under both the Administrative Procedure Act, the Commission's rules, and Supreme Court precedent, cross-examination of a witness is a matter of right. So once Dr. … Both parties got it very late in the discovery period. Both parties supplemented. That's why the timing worked out the way it did. But what happened is this.
42 min of audioOral argument — Seibert v. Lee
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2015
Hyman spent most of his time on, the directed verdict argument and the no guts, no glory comment. … Yes, so that he could see, so he could get a good visualization, because you do get a visualization because air has gone into the abdomen and it's swollen up.
44 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018
And the one exception was Coalition for Clean Air, which was criticized in the Carr case. You're into your rebuttal time. I'm sorry, Your Honor. Reserve it. So if I could reserve... … It did not accept tort liability and his acts were not the Fire Department's for purposes of sovereign immunity. And so he was not acting in an official capacity at that time.
25 min of audioOral argument — Guadalupe Salazar v. McDonald's Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2018
So they're going to send an inspector around from time to time who's going to go to the bathroom, see if it's clean. And if it's not clean, well, then what's he going to do? … Because there's no common law right to a particular meal period or rest period. That's right. Any time period. That's right. And in your hypothetical, I agree.
76 min of audioOral argument — People v. Trejano
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 19, 2018
You have to also remember that this time period was broken up into time periods. … She has to clean that up. She says that takes some time. All this is happening in the first period.
28 min of audioOral argument — Alaa Musa v. CIR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2017
During that time of examination, the taxpayer put forth an effort to clean up his house and provide the IRS with the proper filing of his tax returns and showing of his expenses. … So it imposes on taxpayers the equitable responsibility to report transactions which have an impact on different taxable periods or different taxes in a consistent manner.
25 min of audioOral argument — Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Segal
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2004
If it stopped at saying may at its option sell such leased vehicle, period, you'd have no leg to stand on at all. … I thought, you know, what is your response to opposing counsel's comment that the – and I understood it this way as well, so this to me is an important question.
32 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.