Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.31s
Petitioners Reply Brief — Commissioner v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1977
Supp. 765_--____ 24 States, 399 F. 2d 757, certiorari denied, United States v. Boston Insurance Co., 269 i: gees A 24, 27 Ca Wicca ie 4 Great Commonwealth Life Insurance Co. United States v. … United States, 399 F. 2d 757, 760 (C.A. 7), certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1118; Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co. v.
433 U.S. 148Court rules · Court rule
USM Form 285 ........................................................................... 24 LR 83.7 WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL ........................................................... 24 A. … Bogue Federal Building and United States Courthouse 515 Ninth Street, Room 302 Rapid City, SD 57701 605-399-6000 605-399-6001 (fax) Divisional Office at Pierre: 225 S.
Jurisdictional Statement — Costarelli v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1975
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 7 ’ STEVEN COSTARELLI, Appellant vs. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 141. 2.
421 U.S. 193Federal Register · Rule · Nov 20, 2008
EPA , 399 F.3d 486 (2d Cir. 2005). … Waterkeeper , 399 F.3d at 524.
73 FR 70418Environmental Protection AgencyAppellants Brief — Chicago, M. & St. PR Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1905
Maryland, 10 How., 376, 392, 393, 394; 1 Thomp. on 8 Corp., sec. 399, 400. This is the true rule, even if the act should refer to the merger as a consolidation.“ Central R. R. Co. vs. Ga., 92 U. … Corp., sec. 365-379, 380-387, 396, 399, and cases cited, among them, Zimmer vs. State, 30 Ark., 677; Thomlinson vs. Branch, 15 Wall., 460; and Indianapolis, etc., R. Co. vs. Jones, 29 Ind., 465.
198 U.S. 385Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Delano Medina, Petitioner v. Jennifer Murphy, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 20, 2024
Keating, 399 F.3d 1203, 1209 (10th Cir. 2005). A prisoner may challenge the execution of his sentence in a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Brace v. … United States, 634 F.3d 1167, 1169 (10th Cir. 2011); Boutwell, 399 F.3d at 1210 n.2.
Petitioners Brief — Serfass v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1975
Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 289, 290, 26 L. Ed. 2d 608, 90 S. … Sisson, 399 US. 267, (1970).
420 U.S. 377Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Yang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
a UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Pao YANG; YING YANG; Jammy | No. 94-70439 ——— | on oe A72-399-329 ' escaaitaai A72-399-330 v. - = AT72-399-331 IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION … A72-399-332 SERVICE, A72-399-333 Respondent.
519 U.S. 824Amicus Curiae Brief — Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
See, also, In re Drabick, 245 Cal.Rptr. 840 (Cal.Ct.App.), cert.den. 109 S.Ct. 399 (1988). … /d. at 24-25. 22 not in derogation of, the constitutional nght to refuse treat- ment.
497 U.S. 261Amicus Curiae Brief — Davis v. Washington
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970)... ee 9,10 Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973) .....::ccssc0000 27 Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004).......... passim Delaney v. … REE SERRE SI ae ear ny aN a 24 11 MISCELLANEOUS Amar, Confrontation Clause First Principles: A Reply to Professor Friedman, 86 Geo.
547 U.S. 813Brief for Petitioner — Young v. Ragen
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1949
O’Grady, 312 U. 8, 399, 331. (1941). : The outlinés of the picture presented are clear. … Wilson, 399 Il. 437, 448, 450 (1948).
337 U.S. 235Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lane v. Enoch
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 84 n.4 (1970) and Wardius v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 82, 90 S.Ct. 1893, 1896, 26 L.Ed.2d 446 (1970).
475 U.S. 1053Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Deshawn Legrier, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 30, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir.), rehearing en banc granted, 2020 WL 6689728 (4th Cir. 2020) …………….……………………….. 6, 9-10 United States v. … See Medley, 972 F.3d 399.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Scheiner, 107 DG ya 9, 12, 15, 24 Arizona Governing Comm. v. Norris, 463 U.S. (a ———————————— 7,11, 15, 19 Armco Inc. v. Hardesty, 467 U.S. 638 (1984)........ 24 Ashland Oil, Inc. v. … Choper, Judicial Review in the National Political Process 174-175 (1980). 24 d.
496 U.S. 18Respondents Brief — United States v. Hale
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975
Bere r re ey ee 24, 26 United States v. Ramirez, 441 F.2d 950 (5S Cir. uu, Eee 24, 26 (vii) Page United States v. Semensohn, 421 F.2d 1206 (2 Cir. … Only the timing was accelerated. 399 U.S. at 84-85.
422 U.S. 171Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 9, 2016
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 24 CFR Parts 3280 and 3282 [Docket No. … List of Subjects 24 CFR Part 3280 Housing standards, Incorporation by reference, Manufactured homes. 24 CFR Part 3282 Administrative practice and procedure, Consumer protection, Intergovernmental
81 FR 6806Housing and Urban Development DepartmentPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Wood v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1966
Magnolia Liquor Co., 355 US. 24, at 25. … Magnolia Liquor Co., 355 US. 24.
385 U.S. 978Brief Amicus Curiae — Loving v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1967
Anderson v Martin, 375 US 399 ...............0.00c0c5e 7 Atlanta Motel v.United States, 379 US 241 .......... ueens At - Bailey v. … Gomillion v Lightfoot, 364 US 399. ’ 20. Anderson y Martin, 375 US 399. 21. Edwards v California, 314 US 160; United States v Guest, - — US. —, 16 L ed 2d 239. ._ 22.
388 U.S. 1Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Prudence-Bonds Corp. v. Silbiger
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1950
Supp. 399, 415, aff'd 159 F. 2d 340). … Supp. 399, 406 (D. Del.). In Cromwell v.
340 U.S. 831Supplemental Brief — Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Mayor of College Park
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1923
| | APR 24 1923 } ‘ Mi Pp STANSBURY CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1922. No. 464. GEORGIA RAILWAY & POWER CO. ET AL... … S., 399. hon, Oi 4 They operate not only under the consent franchise of the municipality, but also under franchises from the State (Ree.
262 U.S. 441
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.