Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Shontovia Debose

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2014

There were two counts of bank fraud, counts 34 and 35, and approximately 10 overt acts that occurred during the December 7th and December 9th time period in which Ms. Mercy Proffer, that Mr. … I appreciate the court's comment on that.

Oral argument — Theresa Saunders v. DC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2015

IBM submitted invoices that included employees working 24 hours a day, every day for an eight-month period. Right, which could be a mistake or it could be a fraud, right? … They needed one more clean audit to remove control board oversight. This goes to the second theory, right? You have two theories.

Oral argument — People v. Fretch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

Can you comment on the alleged error by the court in allowing the other crimes evidence, the other acts evidence? Sure, sure. There was two. … Well, he could have just used the probationary period as opposed to the incarceration period. That's true, but he was giving credit for the jail period, so defendant wasn't going to serve the jail.

Oral argument — Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2018

He's talking about his prior employment before the relevant period at a company called ICC and says, let's talk about that period. Did you have any experience with a sequential vacuum bake? … It's well known that you need to clean it, but not the detail of how they achieved it.

Oral argument — Elena Fortaner v. The Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2012

And there are two comments, apparently. This is in the report. There are two comments. The first officer asks in a questioning voice, engine failure? They don't know. … It wouldn't have sounded because the plane, due to whatever was going on there, the plane thought it was in the air.

Oral argument — Quy Truong v. Garden Square Parking Ass'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2020

She wasn't acting as the individual. I included in my, uh, it's in your reply briefs and appendix of this. Of course, yes, I know the court read everything. … Um, in the court's most recent order, the court directed us to focus on the very narrow issue of whether the district court aired and including the attorneys fees as part of the bond amount.

Oral argument — Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2017

It doesn't say when the bank has acted or in the past acted. It says when the bank is acting as the custodian or the agent. … But if we're looking for a clean answer, I mean, I think both sides are giving you a clean answer.

Oral argument — City of Burien v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2019

And the response to that comment says nothing about future projects at the airport. So I guess that is the cumulative impacts question sort of in a nutshell. … understand it, is that based on the timing of the second document, which does identify specific projects, the FAA must have been aware that those projects were pretty close to being proposed during the period

Oral argument — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014

But under both the Administrative Procedure Act, the Commission's rules, and Supreme Court precedent, cross-examination of a witness is a matter of right. So once Dr. … Both parties got it very late in the discovery period. Both parties supplemented. That's why the timing worked out the way it did. But what happened is this.

Oral argument — Aids Hlthcre Fndtn v. Leavitt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2007

Aids Hlthcre Fndtn was one of the original recipients of funding under what's known as the Ryan White Care Act, under what's called Title III of the act. The act is broken into a number of titles. … We received monies from Los Angeles County under another title of the Ryan White Care Act. So we received monies under this act from a lot of different places.

Oral argument — Dotty's Cafe v. Illinois Gaming Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2019

Well, would you say that the legislature took the 50% out of the air? Well, no, Your Honor. … And again, it goes back to my initial comment, where we believe that we are operating as a de facto partnership, where we serve an equal role.

Oral argument — United States v. Yi-Chi Shih

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2023

But that through the process, and especially here on the facts here, there was an extensive period of testing simulation that happened before manufacture, that established that these things would perform … The Clean Air Act has a lot of enabling regulations that also can cause things to be criminal. But again, it does go, at least to that extent, it does go to the notice question.

Oral argument — People v. Lenz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2019

And when somebody is speaking and acting in a bizarre way, that does suggest impairment, does it not? It does, except that the voicemail was left 10 days after the incident. … Why wasn't there some precaution to make sure that the container stayed dry and clean? I don't believe that there's any testimony that it was not dry and clean.

Oral argument — United States v. Yuris Bonilla-Guizar

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2013

There was a woman who came in and cleaned every day. So there were other people who were both living in the house and participating in the offense. The cleaning lady, a co-participant in the crime? … The cleaning lady. The woman who cooked and fed. She's not a participant. She's not a participant. Forget that. The co-defendant.

Oral argument — Calvin Horne v. Electric Eel Manufacturing Com

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2020

So they not only spoliated the machine, but they spoliated their own evidence of when it was inspected, when it was cleaned. … We clean it, we get it ready, and it's rented again after. I understand. What about the evidence concerning Mr. Horne's wife returning?

Oral argument — Dewey Edwards v. DoorDash, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

It's governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, and the Federal Arbitration Act requires that it be enforced as written, and that's exactly what the court did. So Reyna is on point. … I'm hung up on whether it's interlocutory and it's not really a clean vehicle. Well, I think it is a clean vehicle.

Oral argument — Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

But that is an issue under Sections 102 and 103 of the Patent Act. Mr. … So we just know off the bat you're not literally claiming just a principle in the air.

Oral argument — United States v. Perkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024

He, you know, if this court reverses the district court's comment. … Then lawyer says within the time period for rule 35, you can correct this.

Oral argument — United States v. Alarcon Wiggins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016

We're on plain air here, and there's an unpublished opinion. It's Larrier. And for plain air, there can't be any dispute among jurists of reason. And Larrier says this. … He says the court's comments, when read in context, do not reflect obvious improper participation. So you're on the plain air idea that you really need to show obvious improper participation.

Oral argument — CTS Corp. v. Waldburger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2014

CERCLA is a broad cleanup statute focused on, you know, without fault, without liability, cleaning up land. … Congress wanted, again, polluters to be on the hook as long as it took to clean up.