Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.42s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Alarcon Wiggins

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016

    We're on plain air here, and there's an unpublished opinion. It's Larrier. And for plain air, there can't be any dispute among jurists of reason. And Larrier says this. … He says the court's comments, when read in context, do not reflect obvious improper participation. So you're on the plain air idea that you really need to show obvious improper participation.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Woith v. City of Bloomington Fire Pension Fund

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2014

    The language of the statute is caused by an act of duty or the cumulative effects of an act of duty. … If there is evidence of a preexisting condition that is exacerbated by an act, by an injury in an act of duty or cumulative effects of an act of duty, that's pensionable. Okay.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Moncelle v. C.A.P. Air Freight, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2010

    Air Cap, one of the defendants, owned the truck. Cap Air Freight operated the truck. Defendant Matthew Rose drove the truck. … And in the committee comments, it says non-final judgments. Air Cap says, well, the Gray case takes us home.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brown v. Wenderowicz

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2011

    Well, we have the time periods, the sunset and twilight. Let me talk about that time period. That time period was not in the record before the state court, was it? No. Okay. … And we're not here with a clean slate. We don't have a clean slate. We can't look at this in a clean slate. We have to look at what the State Court found. And was it objectively unreasonable?

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Irwin Industrial Tool v. Department of Revenue

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2010

    And over this two-year period, only 25 nights, so on average about once a month. … And then we would have to check on that periodically.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tuftoy v. Rosenwinkel

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2011

    And the legislative history of this act, and I might add the preamble to the act, is explicit. The idea is to protect farmland. It's to protect farmers. … In simple terms, clean it up, break the cycle of active fly breeding by cleaning up your operation. If you put it in the simplest terms. But your own expert said that you could never eliminate them.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — George Kiebala v. Derek Boris

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

    After a period of time has elapsed, it goes down in the rankings, and it's not so easily identifiable. … But the post can even be updated when people comment on the post below it.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State of Texas v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2024

    EPA, there was the statutory right under the Clean Air Act to challenge a denial of a petition for rulemaking. And that kind of procedural right, a petition for a rule making is important. … the statute of limitations period.

    74 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

    The question, the FDA Modernization Act 2.0. … But was that comment to be taken that you should have follow up, that you should further supplement your application in that regard?

    59 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Woods View II LLC v. Kitsap County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2012

    In fact, the county is entitled to act as a provider of comments and opinions to another entity such as the Department of Health. This court has so held that it applies to local governments. … It is not a violation of due process for someone to send a comment.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Karingten v. DVA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2025

    She felt she wanted to do that, not that she was going to act on that. … Did she work remotely during that period? Did he work remotely during that period? That I don't know. That's not in the record.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kivalina v. Teck

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

    Yes, because the borough has been aware of these thousands of violations by the mine for many, many years and has taken absolutely zero enforcement action when they could under the Clean Water Act. … I mean, they, they, any citizen, any governmental authority has the opportunity under the Clean Water Act to bring the citizen enforcement suit that the Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee has.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Betty Smith v. Michael Bokor

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2019

    There's potentially, maybe even a Lanham Act complaint I'd have to read to take a look at that. … And so, you know, I think that it came up on the clear air standard, and the clear air standard is one that says a factual finding should be reversed if there isn't substantial evidence on the record to

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rodell Sanders v. Illinois Union Insurance Co.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 27, 2018

    during the policy period. … Each trial the slate is wiped clean. So we've raised that again here.

    72 min of audio
  • Oral argument — The Village of Lisle v. French

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2023

    What we have here is a prosecution of a village ordinance, period. It's not a hybrid. It's not, Your Honor, a state statute. … As I started to mention earlier, the trial court judge in his ultimate ruling, I'm compelled to comment on the court's conduct of the ruling.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Conley

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2012

    And they said this is not a fundamental right for purposes of the Plain Air Rule. … But it is interesting that that same comment is not in 11.66. The committee did not include the same committee comment that was in 3.06 that applies to dependent statements here.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — William Hunt v. County of Orange

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2011

    Wasn't he supposed to clean up the reserves? Clean up. … This court faced it as far back as Fazio, in fact, comments in the Fazio decision. If we were to carve an exception for whistleblowing speech, so to speak, think about the ramifications.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Panjiva, Inc. v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019

    There was a ballooning with the development of air traffic, air cargo, in the late 70s, 80s, early 90s, and that became much more of an issue. Of course, it's public availability. … And this actual technical act — Right. But the last thing I would say is this particular technical act is not just commas and periods.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2025

    the Navy and the Air Force were subject to statutory combat restrictions, but those were repealed. … But couldn't the – again, I guess I'm trying to focus on the difference between acts of Congress and acts of the executive.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Donell v. Kowell

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2007

    the confines of the Securities Act. … But it seems to me you're coming in fairly clean.

    38 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.