Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.56s
Oral argument — People v. Williams
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2020
So at that point, do we have to look to whether or not the just to the, the air in the comment, or do we have to look at whether what they said about the hearsay argument is was incorrect in order to, … is doing one enough to find out that it was not, that it was air for them to make that comment, that it was not invited, or then do we have to go on and also consider the truthfulness of whether or not
44 min of audioOral argument — Healthy Gulf v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2024
period before the agency. … We didn't raise it in the comment period so as a NEPA issue NEPA excuses things that are justifiably omitted but more importantly as we know from public citizen is something that is so obviously you know
37 min of audioOral argument — Kivalina v. Teck
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003
Yes, because the borough has been aware of these thousands of violations by the mine for many, many years and has taken absolutely zero enforcement action when they could under the Clean Water Act. … I mean, they, they, any citizen, any governmental authority has the opportunity under the Clean Water Act to bring the citizen enforcement suit that the Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee has.
34 min of audioOral argument — Maile Hardcastle v. Mary Hardcastle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023
So we often talk about you know, a denial for a period of time is a harm, right? … Perhaps not as clean as as you might read.
43 min of audioOral argument — Parsons Evergreene, LLC v. Secretary of the Air Force
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2020
Extended the period of performance 126 days that accounted for 126 days associated with structural brick discussion. … The government tries to distinguish a contract disputes act or CDA case we cited, U.S. versus General Electric, 727F, second 1567, by arguing that the Air Force, notice they didn't say AFSVA, did not receive
45 min of audioOral argument — Monica Guessous v. Fairview Property Investments
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2015
This excessive surveillance, the act that occurs within the 300-day period doesn't have to be egregious. It doesn't have to be terrible. … I'm going to the 300-day period.
46 min of audioOral argument — ANSTINE v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011
And so in order to have a claim here, you've got to have a claim that the Air Force acted improperly, which is what caused his resignation. … If the Air Force acted improperly in demoting him to the technical sergeant, and that brought him to the end of the period, and he chose to voluntarily retire, that seems to me still involuntary.
25 min of audioOral argument — People v. Hasselbring
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2014
as defined under the Controlled Substance Act. … May I just make one last comment here? Because I think it's real important.
44 min of audioOral argument — Friends of Animals v. United States Bureau of Land Management
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2025
And now they're getting ready to act again and you say, but wait, there was a bad winter during that year and a half when we had notice and comment and things have changed and a number of horses have passed … Like, you have a time period in which you're acting on currently available information, but then the removal of the excess could come way later.
52 min of audioOral argument — New York State Public Service Commission v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024
And they asked for supplemental comments on that. And my understanding is that those supplemental comments were just filed... The due date was January 19th of this year. … So, for example, it was noted there was a comment period for the current regulations, and my client has participated in that. I'm talking about the statute. I understand, Your Honor.
36 min of audioOral argument — The Village of Lisle v. French
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2023
What we have here is a prosecution of a village ordinance, period. It's not a hybrid. It's not, Your Honor, a state statute. … As I started to mention earlier, the trial court judge in his ultimate ruling, I'm compelled to comment on the court's conduct of the ruling.
38 min of audioOral argument — In re: Deepwater Horizon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015
It was not acted on within the applicable time period of the six-month rule. … period at all.
49 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kemp & Associates
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2018
Those orders brought the Sherman Act prosecution of a per se unlawful customer allocation agreement in the air location services industry to a complete halt. Could I ask just a factual question? … And this Court clearly held that receiving the payment on a bid-rigged contract within the limitations period is sufficient to be an act in furtherance of a conspiracy that brings a conspiracy within the
37 min of audioOral argument — Quy Truong v. Garden Square Parking Ass'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2020
She wasn't acting as the individual. I included in my, uh, it's in your reply briefs and appendix of this. Of course, yes, I know the court read everything. … Um, in the court's most recent order, the court directed us to focus on the very narrow issue of whether the district court aired and including the attorneys fees as part of the bond amount.
21 min of audioOral argument — Irwin Industrial Tool v. Department of Revenue
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2010
And over this two-year period, only 25 nights, so on average about once a month. … And then we would have to check on that periodically.
45 min of audioOral argument — Singh v. Southwest Airlines Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003
At best, she presented evidence that Southwest did occasionally clean up spills in front of their ticket counter, but there was no evidence that Southwest cleaned up spills beyond the 11-foot leased space … It's not failure to act. It is a required act on the part of the party seeking a jury trial. It is an express demand requirement.
38 min of audioOral argument — Restaurant Law Center v. LABR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2024
The Fair Labor Standards Act authorizes employers to take a tip credit for tipped employees. … It really meant dual, like you're cutting meat in the back or you're doing maintenance work on the air conditioning units and things.
43 min of audioOral argument — James v. Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2025
I would argue, no, because if he's not brought to the clinic, it's not The wound care clinic is a sterile environment where they can clean wounds, they can clean, again, bodily orifices. … And yes, deliberate indifference is more than negligence, but it is less than acts or omissions done for the very purpose of causing harm or with knowledge that harm will occur.
61 min of audioOral argument — Jenny Flores v. William Barr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019
That comment period has closed. … If you look up the word ---- How about clean? Is clean in there anywhere? Sanitary sounds like it has some relations to cleanliness.
64 min of audioOral argument — B. P. v. Todd Blanche
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026
But for people You know, I did see that in your brief, but wasn't the situation up in the air as to what you do? … And so I do urge the Court to find that decision persuasive because it certainly does offer a clean understanding of what those statutes mean and how to apply those Supreme Court precedents.
22 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.