Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

2.56s

  • Oral argument — People v. Williams

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2020

    So at that point, do we have to look to whether or not the just to the, the air in the comment, or do we have to look at whether what they said about the hearsay argument is was incorrect in order to, … is doing one enough to find out that it was not, that it was air for them to make that comment, that it was not invited, or then do we have to go on and also consider the truthfulness of whether or not

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Healthy Gulf v. FERC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2024

    period before the agency. … We didn't raise it in the comment period so as a NEPA issue NEPA excuses things that are justifiably omitted but more importantly as we know from public citizen is something that is so obviously you know

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kivalina v. Teck

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

    Yes, because the borough has been aware of these thousands of violations by the mine for many, many years and has taken absolutely zero enforcement action when they could under the Clean Water Act. … I mean, they, they, any citizen, any governmental authority has the opportunity under the Clean Water Act to bring the citizen enforcement suit that the Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee has.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Maile Hardcastle v. Mary Hardcastle

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023

    So we often talk about you know, a denial for a period of time is a harm, right? … Perhaps not as clean as as you might read.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Parsons Evergreene, LLC v. Secretary of the Air Force

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2020

    Extended the period of performance 126 days that accounted for 126 days associated with structural brick discussion. … The government tries to distinguish a contract disputes act or CDA case we cited, U.S. versus General Electric, 727F, second 1567, by arguing that the Air Force, notice they didn't say AFSVA, did not receive

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Monica Guessous v. Fairview Property Investments

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2015

    This excessive surveillance, the act that occurs within the 300-day period doesn't have to be egregious. It doesn't have to be terrible. … I'm going to the 300-day period.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — ANSTINE v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011

    And so in order to have a claim here, you've got to have a claim that the Air Force acted improperly, which is what caused his resignation. … If the Air Force acted improperly in demoting him to the technical sergeant, and that brought him to the end of the period, and he chose to voluntarily retire, that seems to me still involuntary.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Hasselbring

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2014

    as defined under the Controlled Substance Act. … May I just make one last comment here? Because I think it's real important.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Friends of Animals v. United States Bureau of Land Management

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2025

    And now they're getting ready to act again and you say, but wait, there was a bad winter during that year and a half when we had notice and comment and things have changed and a number of horses have passed … Like, you have a time period in which you're acting on currently available information, but then the removal of the excess could come way later.

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — New York State Public Service Commission v. FERC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024

    And they asked for supplemental comments on that. And my understanding is that those supplemental comments were just filed... The due date was January 19th of this year. … So, for example, it was noted there was a comment period for the current regulations, and my client has participated in that. I'm talking about the statute. I understand, Your Honor.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — The Village of Lisle v. French

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2023

    What we have here is a prosecution of a village ordinance, period. It's not a hybrid. It's not, Your Honor, a state statute. … As I started to mention earlier, the trial court judge in his ultimate ruling, I'm compelled to comment on the court's conduct of the ruling.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re: Deepwater Horizon

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015

    It was not acted on within the applicable time period of the six-month rule. … period at all.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Kemp & Associates

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2018

    Those orders brought the Sherman Act prosecution of a per se unlawful customer allocation agreement in the air location services industry to a complete halt. Could I ask just a factual question? … And this Court clearly held that receiving the payment on a bid-rigged contract within the limitations period is sufficient to be an act in furtherance of a conspiracy that brings a conspiracy within the

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Quy Truong v. Garden Square Parking Ass'n

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2020

    She wasn't acting as the individual. I included in my, uh, it's in your reply briefs and appendix of this. Of course, yes, I know the court read everything. … Um, in the court's most recent order, the court directed us to focus on the very narrow issue of whether the district court aired and including the attorneys fees as part of the bond amount.

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Irwin Industrial Tool v. Department of Revenue

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2010

    And over this two-year period, only 25 nights, so on average about once a month. … And then we would have to check on that periodically.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Singh v. Southwest Airlines Co.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

    At best, she presented evidence that Southwest did occasionally clean up spills in front of their ticket counter, but there was no evidence that Southwest cleaned up spills beyond the 11-foot leased space … It's not failure to act. It is a required act on the part of the party seeking a jury trial. It is an express demand requirement.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Restaurant Law Center v. LABR

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2024

    The Fair Labor Standards Act authorizes employers to take a tip credit for tipped employees. … It really meant dual, like you're cutting meat in the back or you're doing maintenance work on the air conditioning units and things.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — James v. Smith

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2025

    I would argue, no, because if he's not brought to the clinic, it's not The wound care clinic is a sterile environment where they can clean wounds, they can clean, again, bodily orifices. … And yes, deliberate indifference is more than negligence, but it is less than acts or omissions done for the very purpose of causing harm or with knowledge that harm will occur.

    61 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jenny Flores v. William Barr

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

    That comment period has closed. … If you look up the word ---- How about clean? Is clean in there anywhere? Sanitary sounds like it has some relations to cleanliness.

    64 min of audio
  • Oral argument — B. P. v. Todd Blanche

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026

    But for people You know, I did see that in your brief, but wasn't the situation up in the air as to what you do? … And so I do urge the Court to find that decision persuasive because it certainly does offer a clean understanding of what those statutes mean and how to apply those Supreme Court precedents.

    22 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.