Documents

Oral argument — City of Peoria v. The Firefighters' Pension Fund of the City of Peoria

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

The ultimate condition would be the period of time. Right. And they do, so the pension board does switch gears. … As this Court is also aware, in granting a disability pension, the act or acts, in this case cumulative effects, need not be the sole or primary cause.

Oral argument — In Interest of A.S. and A.S.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2011

The Juvenile Court Act is very clear. 705 ILCS 405-1-5 states that proceedings are not intended to be adversary in character. … Does it mean sniping at each other and making derisive comments to the court or to opposing parties?

Oral argument — Wisnasky-Bettorf v. Pierce

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 19, 2010

And if a resolution is not required under the public act, why did they file a resolution? … That language remains in the act the way it's listed today.

Oral argument — In re J.D.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2018

So it's important because the parentage act, the way it's set up, there's a specific provision that relates to disestablishing parentage, and that sets forth a limitation period. … The Parentage Act, the purpose and policy in both the 1984 Act and the 2015 Act is to secure the support of parentage for children.

Oral argument — Glass v. Department of Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

The requirements did change periodically throughout and from department to department. There were different requirements imposed in general across the board. … What was told to them on paper was that the executive order required submitting to the vaccine or to periodic testing or to having their exemption approved.

Oral argument — Garest v. Booth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013

You anticipated me to ask you to comment on the special interrogatory because it impacts your argument. … Garris' wrist injury was chronic, and he expressly defined chronic as he was using it as exceeding, extending beyond a three- to six-month period of time. injury.

Oral argument — In re J.R.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2017

Is it the Juvenile Court Act or the Adoption Act that actually allows a parent whose parental rights have been terminated to come in later and subsequently challenge that? … he could have nearly two years ago has truly caused harm to Jamari I want to state for the panel that the case was well argued well briefed we're going to take it under advisement we appreciate your comments

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Yusem

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2018

She bargained to share their income equally during that six-year period. … Your Honor, for those reasons, we believe that the court should reverse the trial court's decision with regard to maintenance, and I'll save my comments for later. All right. Thank you.

Oral argument — Secretary of State v. Illinois Labor Relations Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2012

They had a single witness who testified basically just with a series of conclusory comments which just parroted the statute, saying that these managers, they supervise, they direct. … And they were, for significant periods of time, the top-ranked officer at the jails. However, the court said that is not, you can't evade meeting each of the elements of the act.

Oral argument — People v. DuPree

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2017

I don't think that time period matters insofar as we're talking about his motive. … But the trial court in ruling specifically made the comment that his testimony changed or his testimony is what it is because he got a sweetheart deal to flip. And that was during cross-examination.

Oral argument — S.I. Securities v. Powless

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010

Now, we're beyond the two-year period at this particular point. So what the burden is on the movement is that they have to show fraud to reopen the case. … His comments were he felt that the county should be a party to that aspect of it. I vigorously disagree because the county is not the one. The county is paid.

Oral argument — Shatku v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2013

Webster's defines voluntary as acting or able to act of one's own free will, not constrained or compulsive. Also defines it as intentional. In this matter, to give a brief chronology of facts, Ms. … A notice of appeal was timely filed within the 30-day statutory period after the March 6, 2012 order was entered.

Oral argument — In re Guardianship of C. D. M.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2019

You'll have a chance to make further comment. Come up, Ms. Stone. I think that because Mr. Hanson argued this case, the full citation is Department of Public Aid, Ex Rel, Skelton v. … We have a definition of the role of the guardian ad litem under the Marriage and Dissolution Act. Is there any such definition in the Parentage Act?

Oral argument — Dillard v. Dillard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2015

That's the second sense, period. … The section 4.09 of the Illinois Trust and Trustees Act consists of two sentences. The second sentence was adopted in a public act in 1996.

Oral argument — Carrera v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2018

I'm sorry, I got off my standard of view comment. … And they make so much money every year that any amount of punitive damages for violation of the Consumer Fraud Act doesn't matter.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Lichtenauer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2010

It was speculative at best at that period of time. … And I think it's interesting, I had a different view, that specifically the trial court judge didn't comment on whether or not that was an appropriate or inappropriate strategy.

Oral argument — Labuz v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2012

The appellate court, on the same basis, also commenting that it was a close case. … The traditional way of interpreting it during my 35 years of practice is it's time not worked, period.

Oral argument — McCombs v. Paulsen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2013

Subject matter jurisdiction, if lacking, robs the court of all power to act, from the point that jurisdiction stops existing. There are a couple of dates that are important. … My only kind of an aside comment is that a respondent in discovery, as a respondent in discovery, has no standing to request any type of plea. He's not a partner.

Oral argument — Gibbons v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2013

Grimm doesn't even comment in his report. His report is simply, I believe it's three pages, single-spaced, and Dr. Gornett saw Mr. … So I think that's important that his testimony stayed consistent throughout that, throughout the time period, throughout the hearing. Okay. It's my wife.

Oral argument — Fiala v. Bickford Senior Living Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2015

With respect to this conspiracy case, by the way, there is no unlawful act or lawful act by unlawful means even alleged here. … Just a few comments in rebuttal. One of the last things counsel tried to make a point of was that there was no actual touching by Dr. Naveed of the plaintiff in this case.